A single chip protocol converter integrated circuit (IC) capable of receiving packets generating according to a first protocol type and processing said packets to implement protocol conversion and generating converted packets of a second protocol type for output thereof, the process of protocol conversion being performed entirely within the single integrated circuit chip. The single chip protocol converter can be further implemented as a macro core in a system-on-chip (SoC) implementation, wherein the process of protocol conversion is contained within a SoC protocol conversion macro core without requiring the processing resources of a host system. Packet conversion may additionally entail converting packets generated according to a first protocol version level and processing the said packets to implement protocol conversion for generating converted packets according to a second protocol version level, but within the same protocol family type. The single chip protocol converter integrated circuit and SoC protocol conversion macro implementation include multiprocessing capability including processor devices that are configurable to adapt and modify the operating functionality of the chip.

Single chip protocol converter

A system and method are described for secure data transfer over a network. According to an exemplary embodiment a system for secure data transfer over a network includes memory and a memory controller configured to transfer data received from the network to the memory. The system includes a processor, having logic configured to retrieve a portion of the data from the memory using the memory controller. The processor also includes logic configured to perform security operations on the retrieved portion of the data, and logic configured to store the operated-on portion of the data in the memory using the memory controller. The memory controller is further configured to transfer the operated-on portion of the data from the memory to the network.

Secure data transfer over a network

A system including a storage processing device with an input/output module. The input/output module has port processors to receive and transmit network traffic. The input/output module also has a switch connecting the port processors. Each port processor categorizes the network traffic as fast path network traffic or control path network traffic. The switch routes fast path network traffic from an ingress port processor to a specified egress port processor. The storage processing device also includes a control module to process the control path network traffic received from the ingress port processor. The control module routes processed control path network traffic to the switch for routing to a defined egress port processor. The control module is connected to the input/output module. The input/output module and the control module are configured to interactively support data virtualization, data migration, data journaling, and snapshotting. The distributed control and fast path processors achieve scaling of storage network software. The storage processors provide line-speed processing of storage data using a rich set of storage-optimized hardware acceleration engines. The multi-protocol switching fabric provides a low-latency, protocol-neutral interconnect that integrally links all components with any-to-any non-blocking throughput.

Apparatus and method for storage processing through scalable port processors

A network processor includes a system-onchip (SoC) macro core and functions as a single chip protocol converter that receives packets generating according to a first protocol type and processes the packets to implement protocol conversion and generates converted packets of a second protocol type for output thereof, the process of protocol conversion being performed entirely within the SoC macro core. The process of protocol conversion contained within the SoC macro core does not require the processing resources of a host system. The system-on chip macro core includes a bridge device for coupling a local bus in the protocol converting multiprocessor SoC macro core local bus to peripheral interfaces coupled to a system bus.

Network processor system on chip with bridge coupling protocol converting multiprocessor macro core local bus to peripheral interfaces coupled system bus

Network processors (NPs) typically contain multiple concurrent processing cores. State-of-the-art programming techniques for NPs are invariably low-level, requiring programmers to partition code into concurrent tasks early in the design process. This results in programs that are hard to maintain and hard to port to alternative architectures. This paper presents a new approach in which a high-level program is separated from its partitioning into concurrent tasks. Designers write their programs in a high-level, domain-specific, architecturally-neutral language, but also provide a separate Architecture Mapping Script (AMS). An AMS specifies semantics-preserving transformations that are applied to the program to re-arrange it into a set of tasks appropriate for execution on a particular target architecture. We (i) describe three such transformations: pipeline introduction, pipeline elimination and queue multiplexing; and (ii) specify when each can be safely applied.

As a case study we describe an IP packet-forwarder and present an AMS script that partitions it into a form capable of running at 3Gb/s on an Intel IXP2400 Network Processor.

/pdf/task-partitioning-for-multi-core-network-processors-4k7bi6wqnn.pdf

Task partitioning for multi-core network processors

Deep packet processing is migrating to the edges of service provider networks to simplify and speed up core functions. On the other hand, the cores of such networks are migrating to the switching of high-speed traffic aggregates. As a result, more services will have to be performed at the edges, on behalf of both the core and the end users. Associated network equipment will therefore require high flexibility to support evolving high-level services as well as extraordinary performance to deal with the high packet rates. Whereas, in the past, network equipment was based either on general-purpose processors (GPPs) or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), favoring flexibility over speed or vice versa, the network processor approach achieves both flexibility and performance. The key advantage of network processors is that hardware-level performance is complemented by flexible software architecture. This paper provides an overview of the IBM PowerNPTM NP4GS3 network processor and how it addresses these issues. Its hardware and software design characteristics and its comprehensive base operating software make it well suited for a wide range of networking applications.

/pdf/ibm-powernp-network-processor-hardware-software-and-4330d7aque.pdf

G. T. Davis

Papers

IBM PowerNP network processor: Hardware, software, and applications