G
Gail T. Fairhurst
Researcher at University of Cincinnati
Publications - 75
Citations - 6541
Gail T. Fairhurst is an academic researcher from University of Cincinnati. The author has contributed to research in topics: Leadership & Leadership style. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 74 publications receiving 5915 citations. Previous affiliations of Gail T. Fairhurst include Texas Tech University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach†
TL;DR: In this paper, a constitutive approach to the study of organizational contradictions, dialectics, paradoxes, and tensions is presented, highlighting five constitutive dimensions (i.e., discourse, developmental actions, socio-historical conditions, presence in multiples, and praxis).
Journal ArticleDOI
Organizations as Discursive Constructions
TL;DR: This article examined the relationship between discourse and organization and argued that three orientations are necessary and should operate simultaneously to reveal a complex view of the organization-discourse relationship, and used these interpretations and different notions about discourse to explore the research traditions on organizational language and social interaction.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide
Gail T. Fairhurst,David Grant +1 more
TL;DR: A growing body of literature now exists concerning the social construction of leadership as discussed by the authors, which draws on a variety of definitions of social constructionism, multiple constructs, and an array of perspectives, approaches, and methods.
Book
The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership
Gail T. Fairhurst,Robert A. Sarr +1 more
TL;DR: This book discusses Framing: Seizing Leadership Moments in Everyday Conversations, as well as tools for Framing, and establishing Credibility: What You Frame, How You frame, and How Others Frame You.
Book
Discursive Leadership: In Conversation with Leadership Psychology
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss two traditions: sequence and temporal form and membership categorization, and discuss self-identities, interpretive repertoires, and narrative logic.