scispace - formally typeset
G

Gavin Jack

Researcher at Monash University

Publications -  66
Citations -  2310

Gavin Jack is an academic researcher from Monash University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tourism & Identity (social science). The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 62 publications receiving 2000 citations. Previous affiliations of Gavin Jack include University of Stirling & Saint Petersburg State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Critical Turns in the Evolution of Diversity Management

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify four overlapping turns in the history of diversity management: demographic, political, economic and critical, and argue that diversity management can perpetuate rather than combat inequalities in the workplace; diminish the legacy of discrimination against historically repressed minorities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Critique and International Management: an Uneasy Relationship?

TL;DR: The eight contributions in this special topic forum attempt to open up metatheoretical conversations with international management as mentioned in this paper, which requires a reflexive reexamination of what we already know and a commitment to bring others' voices into an ongoing rewriting of the field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business

TL;DR: In this article, a reconfiguration of international business research by subjecting it to a postcolonial critique is proposed, where the authors see business research as exhibiting continuities with the colonial project in the way it appropriates the Other, which can marginalize discussion of important ontological, epistemological and political issues inherent in any research process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Manifesto for a post-colonial international business and management studies: A provocation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors make a call to scholars in international management and business studies to embrace post-colonial theory and to allow it to provide an interrogation of the ontological, epistemological, methodological and institutional resources currently dominating the field.