scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Georg Still

Other affiliations: University of Trier
Bio: Georg Still is an academic researcher from University of Twente. The author has contributed to research in topics: Optimization problem & Semi-infinite programming. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 78 publications receiving 1586 citations. Previous affiliations of Georg Still include University of Trier.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Semi-infinite programming (SIP) as discussed by the authors is an optimization problem in which finitely many variables appear in infinitely many constraints, and it naturally arises in an abundant number of applications in different fields of mathematics, economics and engineering.

213 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Georg Still1
TL;DR: It will be shown how this rate depends on whether the minimizer is strict of order one or two and onWhether the discretization includes boundary points of the index set in a specific way, for ordinary and generalized semi-infinite problems.
Abstract: The discretization approach for solving semi-infinite optimization problems is considered. We are interested in the convergence rate of the error between the solution of the semi-infinite problem and the solution of the discretized program depending on the discretization mesh-size. It will be shown how this rate depends on whether the minimizer is strict of order one or two and on whether the discretization includes boundary points of the index set in a specific way. This is done for ordinary and for generalized semi-infinite problems.

112 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work studies the so-called K KT-approach for solving bilevel problems, where the lower level minimality condition is replaced by the KKT- or the FJ-condition, which leads to a special structured mathematical program with complementarity constraints.
Abstract: Bilevel programs (BL) form a special class of optimization problems. They appear in many models in economics, game theory and mathematical physics. BL programs show a more complicated structure than standard finite problems. We study the so-called KKT-approach for solving bilevel problems, where the lower level minimality condition is replaced by the KKT- or the FJ-condition. This leads to a special structured mathematical program with complementarity constraints. We analyze the KKT-approach from a generic viewpoint and reveal the advantages and possible drawbacks of this approach for solving BL problems numerically.

108 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new numerical solution method based on a reformulation of the semi-infinite problem as a Stackelberg game and the use of regularized nonlinear complementarity problem functions to solve lower level optimization problems with convex lower level problems is introduced.
Abstract: We introduce a new numerical solution method for semi-infinite optimization problems with convex lower level problems. The method is based on a reformulation of the semi-infinite problem as a Stackelberg game and the use of regularized nonlinear complementarity problem functions. This approach leads to central path conditions for the lower level problems, where for a given path parameter a smooth nonlinear finite optimization problem has to be solved. The solution of the semi-infinite optimization problem then amounts to driving the path parameter to zero.We show convergence properties of the method and give a number of numerical examples from design centering and from robust optimization, where actually so-called generalized semi-infinite optimization problems are solved. The presented method is easy to implement, and in our examples it works well for dimensions of the semi-infinite index set at least up to 150.

97 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown by a structural analysis that for (GSIP)-problems the regularity assumptions for the reduction approach can be expected to hold generically at a solution but for general (BL-problems not.

91 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: “Multivalued Analysis” is the theory of set-valued maps (called multifonctions) and has important applications in many different areas and there is no doubt that a modern treatise on “Nonlinear functional analysis” can not afford the luxury of ignoring multivalued analysis.
Abstract: “Multivalued Analysis” is the theory of set-valued maps (called multifonctions) and has important applications in many different areas. Multivalued analysis is a remarkable mixture of many different parts of mathematics such as point-set topology, measure theory and nonlinear functional analysis. It is also closely related to “Nonsmooth Analysis” (Chapter 5) and in fact one of the main motivations behind the development of the theory, was in order to provide necessary analytical tools for the study of problems in nonsmooth analysis. It is not a coincidence that the development of the two fields coincide chronologically and follow parallel paths. Today multivalued analysis is a mature mathematical field with its own methods, techniques and applications that range from social and economic sciences to biological sciences and engineering. There is no doubt that a modern treatise on “Nonlinear Functional Analysis” can not afford the luxury of ignoring multivalued analysis. The omission of the theory of multifunctions will drastically limit the possible applications.

996 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper considers an alternative ‘randomized’ or ‘scenario’ approach for dealing with uncertainty in optimization, based on constraint sampling, and studies the constrained optimization problem resulting by taking into account only a finite set of N constraints, chosen at random among the possible constraint instances of the uncertain problem.
Abstract: Many engineering problems can be cast as optimization problems subject to convex constraints that are parameterized by an uncertainty or ‘instance’ parameter. Two main approaches are generally available to tackle constrained optimization problems in presence of uncertainty: robust optimization and chance-constrained optimization. Robust optimization is a deterministic paradigm where one seeks a solution which simultaneously satisfies all possible constraint instances. In chance-constrained optimization a probability distribution is instead assumed on the uncertain parameters, and the constraints are enforced up to a pre-specified level of probability. Unfortunately however, both approaches lead to computationally intractable problem formulations. In this paper, we consider an alternative ‘randomized’ or ‘scenario’ approach for dealing with uncertainty in optimization, based on constraint sampling. In particular, we study the constrained optimization problem resulting by taking into account only a finite set of N constraints, chosen at random among the possible constraint instances of the uncertain problem. We show that the resulting randomized solution fails to satisfy only a small portion of the original constraints, provided that a sufficient number of samples is drawn. Our key result is to provide an efficient and explicit bound on the measure (probability or volume) of the original constraints that are possibly violated by the randomized solution. This volume rapidly decreases to zero as N is increased.

734 citations