scispace - formally typeset
G

Gerald Gartlehner

Researcher at Research Triangle Park

Publications -  322
Citations -  19130

Gerald Gartlehner is an academic researcher from Research Triangle Park. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Randomized controlled trial. The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 295 publications receiving 15320 citations. Previous affiliations of Gerald Gartlehner include Cochrane Collaboration & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.

TL;DR: To better delineate periods of peak prevalence and incidence for perinatal depression and identify high risk subpopulations, studies with larger and more representative samples are needed.
DatasetDOI

Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes.

TL;DR: Although many screening instruments have been developed or modified to detect major and minor depression in pregnant and newly delivered women, the evidence on their screening accuracy relative to a reference standard has yet to be systematically reviewed and assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.

TL;DR: A rapid review on the effectiveness of quarantine during severe coronavirus outbreaks found that quarantine is important in reducing incidence and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].

TL;DR: This article is the first of a series providing guidance for the use of the GRADE system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternative management options.
Journal ArticleDOI

[GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness].

TL;DR: Decisions regarding indirectness of patients and interventions depend on an understanding of whether biological or social factors are sufficiently different that one might expect substantial differences in the magnitude of effect.