scispace - formally typeset
G

Giangiacomo Bravo

Researcher at Linnaeus University

Publications -  88
Citations -  2022

Giangiacomo Bravo is an academic researcher from Linnaeus University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Commons & Population. The author has an hindex of 20, co-authored 83 publications receiving 1474 citations. Previous affiliations of Giangiacomo Bravo include Anglia Ruskin University & University of Brescia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator

TL;DR: In this paper, consumption-based measures offer an insightful perspective on the debate on the relationship between economic growth and the environment, and they have been shown to be useful in the context of economic forecasting.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals

TL;DR: It is found that publishing reports did not significantly compromise referees’ willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times, and suggest that open peer review does not compromise the process, at least when referees are able to protect their anonymity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Human Sustainable Development Index: New calculations and a first critical analysis

TL;DR: The Human Sustainable Development Index (HSDI) as discussed by the authors has been proposed as a way to amend the United Nations Human Development Index by adding an environmental dimension, but despite some attention in the media, the HSDI remained largely ignored by the scientific community.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.

TL;DR: The authors found that during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an unusually high submission rate of scholarly articles, which may have penalized the scientific productivity of women.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate that offering material rewards to referees tends to decrease the quality and efficiency of the reviewing process, and support the idea that journal editors and responsible of research funding agencies should be extremely careful in offering material incentives on reviewing, since these might undermine moral motives which guide referees' behavior.