scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Gillian L. Dalgliesh

Bio: Gillian L. Dalgliesh is an academic researcher from Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mutation & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 15 publications receiving 6428 citations. Previous affiliations of Gillian L. Dalgliesh include University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center & University of Glasgow.
Topics: Mutation, Cancer, Gene, Histone H3, Carcinogenesis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
08 Mar 2007-Nature
TL;DR: More than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers reveal the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.
Abstract: Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be 'passengers' that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for 'driver' mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.

2,732 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
27 Jan 2011-Nature
TL;DR: The protein coding exome is sequenced in a series of primary ccRCC and the identification of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex gene PBRM1 is reported as a second majorccRCC cancer gene, with truncating mutations in 41% (92/227) of cases.
Abstract: The genetics of renal cancer is dominated by inactivation of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the commonest histological subtype. A recent large-scale screen of ∼3,500 genes by PCR-based exon re-sequencing identified several new cancer genes in ccRCC including UTX (also known as KDM6A), JARID1C (also known as KDM5C) and SETD2 (ref. 2). These genes encode enzymes that demethylate (UTX, JARID1C) or methylate (SETD2) key lysine residues of histone H3. Modification of the methylation state of these lysine residues of histone H3 regulates chromatin structure and is implicated in transcriptional control. However, together these mutations are present in fewer than 15% of ccRCC, suggesting the existence of additional, currently unidentified cancer genes. Here, we have sequenced the protein coding exome in a series of primary ccRCC and report the identification of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex gene PBRM1 (ref. 4) as a second major ccRCC cancer gene, with truncating mutations in 41% (92/227) of cases. These data further elucidate the somatic genetic architecture of ccRCC and emphasize the marked contribution of aberrant chromatin biology.

1,186 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
21 Jan 2010-Nature
TL;DR: The identification of inactivating mutations in two genes encoding enzymes involved in histone modification and NF2 mutations were found in non-VHL mutated ccRCC, and several other probable cancer genes were identified, indicating that substantial genetic heterogeneity exists in a cancer type dominated by mutations in a single gene.
Abstract: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of adult kidney cancer, characterized by the presence of inactivating mutations in the VHL gene in most cases, and by infrequent somatic mutations in known cancer genes. To determine further the genetics of ccRCC, we have sequenced 101 cases through 3,544 protein-coding genes. Here we report the identification of inactivating mutations in two genes encoding enzymes involved in histone modification-SETD2, a histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase, and JARID1C (also known as KDM5C), a histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase-as well as mutations in the histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase, UTX (KMD6A), that we recently reported. The results highlight the role of mutations in components of the chromatin modification machinery in human cancer. Furthermore, NF2 mutations were found in non-VHL mutated ccRCC, and several other probable cancer genes were identified. These results indicate that substantial genetic heterogeneity exists in a cancer type dominated by mutations in a single gene, and that systematic screens will be key to fully determining the somatic genetic architecture of cancer.

1,115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: UTX reintroduction into cancer cells with inactivating UTX mutations resulted in slowing of proliferation and marked transcriptional changes, identifying UTX as a new human cancer gene.
Abstract: Somatically acquired epigenetic changes are present in many cancers. Epigenetic regulation is maintained via post-translational modifications of core histones. Here, we describe inactivating somatic mutations in the histone lysine demethylase gene UTX, pointing to histone H3 lysine methylation deregulation in multiple tumor types. UTX reintroduction into cancer cells with inactivating UTX mutations resulted in slowing of proliferation and marked transcriptional changes. These data identify UTX as a new human cancer gene.

749 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Feb 2010-Nature
TL;DR: Structural signatures are derived that distinguish between homozygous deletions over recessive cancer genes and fragile sites and illustrate how structural signatures can be used to distinguish between the influences of mutation and selection in cancer genomes.
Abstract: The cancer genome is moulded by the dual processes of somatic mutation and selection. Homozygous deletions in cancer genomes occur over recessive cancer genes, where they can confer selective growth advantage, and over fragile sites, where they are thought to reflect an increased local rate of DNA breakage. However, most homozygous deletions in cancer genomes are unexplained. Here we identified 2,428 somatic homozygous deletions in 746 cancer cell lines. These overlie 11% of protein-coding genes that, therefore, are not mandatory for survival of human cells. We derived structural signatures that distinguish between homozygous deletions over recessive cancer genes and fragile sites. Application to clusters of unexplained homozygous deletions suggests that many are in regions of inherent fragility, whereas a small subset overlies recessive cancer genes. The results illustrate how structural signatures can be used to distinguish between the influences of mutation and selection in cancer genomes. The extensive copy number, genotyping, sequence and expression data available for this large series of publicly available cancer cell lines renders them informative reagents for future studies of cancer biology and drug discovery.

683 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development.
Abstract: Background Intratumor heterogeneity may foster tumor evolution and adaptation and hinder personalized-medicine strategies that depend on results from single tumor-biopsy samples. Methods To examine intratumor heterogeneity, we performed exome sequencing, chromosome aberration analysis, and ploidy profiling on multiple spatially separated samples obtained from primary renal carcinomas and associated metastatic sites. We characterized the consequences of intratumor heterogeneity using immunohistochemical analysis, mutation functional analysis, and profiling of messenger RNA expression. Results Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed branched evolutionary tumor growth, with 63 to 69% of all somatic mutations not detectable across every tumor region. Intratumor heterogeneity was observed for a mutation within an autoinhibitory domain of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase, correlating with S6 and 4EBP phosphorylation in vivo and constitutive activation of mTOR kinase activity in vitro. Mutational intratumor heterogeneity was seen for multiple tumor-suppressor genes converging on loss of function; SETD2, PTEN, and KDM5C underwent multiple distinct and spatially separated inactivating mutations within a single tumor, suggesting convergent phenotypic evolution. Gene-expression signatures of good and poor prognosis were detected in different regions of the same tumor. Allelic composition and ploidy profiling analysis revealed extensive intratumor heterogeneity, with 26 of 30 tumor samples from four tumors harboring divergent allelic-imbalance profiles and with ploidy heterogeneity in two of four tumors. Conclusions Intratumor heterogeneity can lead to underestimation of the tumor genomics landscape portrayed from single tumor-biopsy samples and may present major challenges to personalized-medicine and biomarker development. Intratumor heterogeneity, associated with heterogeneous protein function, may foster tumor adaptation and therapeutic failure through Darwinian selection. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others.)

6,672 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Mar 2013-Science
TL;DR: This work has revealed the genomic landscapes of common forms of human cancer, which consists of a small number of “mountains” (genes altered in a high percentage of tumors) and a much larger number of "hills" (Genes altered infrequently).
Abstract: Over the past decade, comprehensive sequencing efforts have revealed the genomic landscapes of common forms of human cancer. For most cancer types, this landscape consists of a small number of “mountains” (genes altered in a high percentage of tumors) and a much larger number of “hills” (genes altered infrequently). To date, these studies have revealed ~140 genes that, when altered by intragenic mutations, can promote or “drive” tumorigenesis. A typical tumor contains two to eight of these “driver gene” mutations; the remaining mutations are passengers that confer no selective growth advantage. Driver genes can be classified into 12 signaling pathways that regulate three core cellular processes: cell fate, cell survival, and genome maintenance. A better understanding of these pathways is one of the most pressing needs in basic cancer research. Even now, however, our knowledge of cancer genomes is sufficient to guide the development of more effective approaches for reducing cancer morbidity and mortality.

6,441 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
21 Jun 2012-Nature
TL;DR: The results provide a novel molecular stratification of the breast cancer population, derived from the impact of somatic CNAs on the transcriptome, and identify novel subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes, which reproduced in the validation cohort.
Abstract: The elucidation of breast cancer subgroups and their molecular drivers requires integrated views of the genome and transcriptome from representative numbers of patients. We present an integrated analysis of copy number and gene expression in a discovery and validation set of 997 and 995 primary breast tumours, respectively, with long-term clinical follow-up. Inherited variants (copy number variants and single nucleotide polymorphisms) and acquired somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) were associated with expression in 40% of genes, with the landscape dominated by cisand trans-acting CNAs. By delineating expression outlier genes driven in cis by CNAs, we identified putative cancer genes, including deletions in PPP2R2A, MTAP and MAP2K4. Unsupervised analysis of paired DNA–RNA profiles revealed novel subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes, which reproduced in the validation cohort. These include a high-risk, oestrogen-receptor-positive 11q13/14 cis-acting subgroup and a favourable prognosis subgroup devoid of CNAs. Trans-acting aberration hotspots were found to modulate subgroup-specific gene networks, including a TCR deletion-mediated adaptive immune response in the ‘CNA-devoid’ subgroup and a basal-specific chromosome 5 deletion-associated mitotic network. Our results provide a novel molecular stratification of the breast cancer population, derived from the impact of somatic CNAs on the transcriptome.

4,722 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The known histone modifications are described, where they are found genomically and discussed and some of their functional consequences are discussed, concentrating mostly on transcription where the majority of characterisation has taken place.
Abstract: Chromatin is not an inert structure, but rather an instructive DNA scaffold that can respond to external cues to regulate the many uses of DNA. A principle component of chromatin that plays a key role in this regulation is the modification of histones. There is an ever-growing list of these modifications and the complexity of their action is only just beginning to be understood. However, it is clear that histone modifications play fundamental roles in most biological processes that are involved in the manipulation and expression of DNA. Here, we describe the known histone modifications, define where they are found genomically and discuss some of their functional consequences, concentrating mostly on transcription where the majority of characterisation has taken place.

4,536 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Michael S. Lawrence1, Petar Stojanov1, Petar Stojanov2, Paz Polak3, Paz Polak1, Paz Polak2, Gregory V. Kryukov2, Gregory V. Kryukov3, Gregory V. Kryukov1, Kristian Cibulskis1, Andrey Sivachenko1, Scott L. Carter1, Chip Stewart1, Craig H. Mermel1, Craig H. Mermel2, Steven A. Roberts4, Adam Kiezun1, Peter S. Hammerman2, Peter S. Hammerman1, Aaron McKenna1, Aaron McKenna5, Yotam Drier, Lihua Zou1, Alex H. Ramos1, Trevor J. Pugh2, Trevor J. Pugh1, Nicolas Stransky1, Elena Helman6, Elena Helman1, Jaegil Kim1, Carrie Sougnez1, Lauren Ambrogio1, Elizabeth Nickerson1, Erica Shefler1, Maria L. Cortes1, Daniel Auclair1, Gordon Saksena1, Douglas Voet1, Michael S. Noble1, Daniel DiCara1, Pei Lin1, Lee Lichtenstein1, David I. Heiman1, Timothy Fennell1, Marcin Imielinski1, Marcin Imielinski2, Bryan Hernandez1, Eran Hodis2, Eran Hodis1, Sylvan C. Baca2, Sylvan C. Baca1, Austin M. Dulak1, Austin M. Dulak2, Jens G. Lohr1, Jens G. Lohr2, Dan A. Landau1, Dan A. Landau7, Dan A. Landau2, Catherine J. Wu2, Jorge Melendez-Zajgla, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda, Amnon Koren2, Amnon Koren1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Steven A. McCarroll1, Jaume Mora8, Ryan S. Lee9, Ryan S. Lee2, Brian D. Crompton9, Brian D. Crompton2, Robert C. Onofrio1, Melissa Parkin1, Wendy Winckler1, Kristin G. Ardlie1, Stacey Gabriel1, Charles W. M. Roberts2, Charles W. M. Roberts9, Jaclyn A. Biegel10, Kimberly Stegmaier2, Kimberly Stegmaier1, Kimberly Stegmaier9, Adam J. Bass1, Adam J. Bass2, Levi A. Garraway1, Levi A. Garraway2, Matthew Meyerson2, Matthew Meyerson1, Todd R. Golub, Dmitry A. Gordenin4, Shamil R. Sunyaev3, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, Shamil R. Sunyaev1, Eric S. Lander6, Eric S. Lander2, Eric S. Lander1, Gad Getz1, Gad Getz2 
11 Jul 2013-Nature
TL;DR: A fundamental problem with cancer genome studies is described: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds and the list includes many implausible genes, suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events.
Abstract: Major international projects are underway that are aimed at creating a comprehensive catalogue of all the genes responsible for the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies involve the sequencing of matched tumour-normal samples followed by mathematical analysis to identify those genes in which mutations occur more frequently than expected by random chance. Here we describe a fundamental problem with cancer genome studies: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds. The list includes many implausible genes (such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the muscle protein titin), suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events. We show that this problem stems largely from mutational heterogeneity and provide a novel analytical methodology, MutSigCV, for resolving the problem. We apply MutSigCV to exome sequences from 3,083 tumour-normal pairs and discover extraordinary variation in mutation frequency and spectrum within cancer types, which sheds light on mutational processes and disease aetiology, and in mutation frequency across the genome, which is strongly correlated with DNA replication timing and also with transcriptional activity. By incorporating mutational heterogeneity into the analyses, MutSigCV is able to eliminate most of the apparent artefactual findings and enable the identification of genes truly associated with cancer.

4,411 citations