scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Giovanni Sartori

Other affiliations: University of Florence
Bio: Giovanni Sartori is an academic researcher from Columbia University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Ideology & Trusted third party. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 76 publications receiving 11047 citations. Previous affiliations of Giovanni Sartori include University of Florence.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: In this article, Eijk et al. discuss the filosofia politica, i.e., lo studio dei concetti, dei fondamenti e dei modelli dell'attività politica.
Abstract: Elementi Di Teoria Politica [Free] Elementi Di Teoria Politica [EPUB] [PDF] La filosofia politica è lo studio dei concetti, dei fondamenti e dei modelli dell'attività politica. Essa può occuparsi della costruzione di teorie normative di ... zo, 26 mei 2019 21:43:00 GMT Elitismo Wikipedia L’organizzazione del potere nel pensiero di Gaetano Mosca 177 L’organizzazione del potere nel pensiero di Gaetano Mosca claudio martinelli 1. Introduzione In tutte le società regolarmente costituite, nelle L’antropologia cristiana e la teoria del genere Willem ... L’antropologia cristiana e la teoria del genere Willem Jacobus Card. Eijk, Arcivescovo di Utrecht Incontro delle Commissioni dottrinali europee (Esztergom, 14 ... IL CASO SOCRATE homolaicus.com IL CASO SOCRATE. I II. Il problema della datazione. Quando si parla del "caso Socrate" bisognerebbe anzitutto collocarlo storicamente, il che non è molto semplice. SINTESI DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA ANTICA argomentare corso di filosofia per problemi 2012 sintesi di storia della filosofia antica a cura di paolo vidali edizione digitale selezione di brani da c.sini, i filosofi e le ...

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For instance, Daalder as mentioned in this paper argues that political science should not follow the American molding of present-day political science, arguing that it is a discipline largely dominated by juridical or historical approaches (e.g., of Gaetano Mosca).
Abstract: Political science, as we currently understand the label, was born, in Western Europe, in the early Fifties. One may say that it was “reborn”; but that would be inaccurate, for in the nineteenth century and until World War Two the label indicated a captive discipline largely dominated by juridical or historical approaches (as in the case, e.g., of Gaetano Mosca). So political science had a new start and became a field of inquiry in its own right about half a century ago. I was, at the time, one of its founders (with Stein Rokkan, Juan Linz, Mattei Dogan, Hans Daalder, Erik Allardt, S. N. Eisenstadt, and others. See: Comparative European Politics: The Story of a Profession, edited by H. Daalder, 1997). I am thus one of the witnesses of what the “young turks” of the time had in mind, of how we conceived and promoted political science. I am now an “ancient sage” and it now pleases me to reflect, some fifty years later, on where political science has gone and on whether it has taken the right course, the course that I had wished for and expected. Thus to ask today, in the middle of Mitteleuropa, where political science has been heading is also to ask whether the new beginnings of the discipline in Eastern Europe should or should not follow the path entered by our “big brother,” I mean, by American-type political science. I too have been somewhat swallowed by our big brother (to be sure, a benevolent and well meaning one) in the sense that I have been teaching in the United States for some thirty years. Let me add that I have largely benefited from my American exposure. Yet I have always resisted and still resist the American influence. And I take this occasion to say why I am unhappy about the American molding of present day political science.

49 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the party effects of electoral systems are investigated in the context of comparative and theoretical perspective, and the parties, elections, and differences between them are compared in a comparative and theoretical perspective.
Abstract: (1999). The party‐effects of electoral systems. Israel Affairs: Vol. 6, Parties, Elections and Cleavages: Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective, pp. 13-28.

43 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a learning from error exercise under the assumption that unless we take stock of our past mistakes we are bound to repeat them and the notion of totalitarianism appears to serve this purpose well.
Abstract: This article is conceived as a learning from error exercise under the assumption that unless we take stock of our past mistakes we are bound to repeat them. The notion of totalitarianism appears to serve this purpose well. It is shown, (i) that totalitarianism was dismissed prematurely for wrong reasons, (ii) that its successor concepts have been wrongly conceived as `models', and (iii) that model mania had developed to a point of harming our understanding. The exercise is retrospective in order to be prospective. Thus, totalitarianism is revisited to illustrate the analytic handling of typological constructs and to buttress the general point that political science has backed itself into a number of blind alleys.

43 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
15 Feb 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, a text that emphasizes the importance of case studies in social science scholarship and shows how to make case study practices more rigorous is presented, with a focus on case studies.
Abstract: A text that emphasizes the importance of case studies in social science scholarship and shows how to make case study practices more rigorous.

6,260 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Paul Pierson1
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conceptualized path dependence as a social process grounded in a dynamic of increasing returns, and demonstrated that increasing returns processes are likely to be prevalent and that good analytical foundations exist for exploring their causes and consequences.
Abstract: It is increasingly common for social scientists to describe political processes as “path dependent.” The concept, however, is often employed without careful elaboration. This article conceptualizes path dependence as a social process grounded in a dynamic of “increasing returns.” Reviewing recent literature in economics and suggesting extensions to the world of politics, the article demonstrates that increasing returns processes are likely to be prevalent, and that good analytical foundations exist for exploring their causes and consequences. The investigation of increasing returns can provide a more rigorous framework for developing some of the key claims of recent scholarship in historical institutionalism: Specific patterns of timing and sequence matter; a wide range of social outcomes may be possible; large consequences may result from relatively small or contingent events; particular courses of action, once introduced, can be almost impossible to reverse; and consequently, political development is punctuated by critical moments or junctures that shape the basic contours of social life.

5,652 citations

Book
01 Oct 1999
TL;DR: Wendt as discussed by the authors describes four factors which can drive structural change from one culture to another - interdependence, common fate, homogenization, and self-restraint - and examines the effects of capitalism and democracy in the emergence of a Kantian culture in the West.
Abstract: Drawing upon philosophy and social theory, Social Theory of International Politics develops a theory of the international system as a social construction. Alexander Wendt clarifies the central claims of the constructivist approach, presenting a structural and idealist worldview which contrasts with the individualism and materialism which underpins much mainstream international relations theory. He builds a cultural theory of international politics, which takes whether states view each other as enemies, rivals or friends as a fundamental determinant. Wendt characterises these roles as 'cultures of anarchy', described as Hobbesian, Lockean and Kantian respectively. These cultures are shared ideas which help shape state interests and capabilities, and generate tendencies in the international system. The book describes four factors which can drive structural change from one culture to another - interdependence, common fate, homogenization, and self-restraint - and examines the effects of capitalism and democracy in the emergence of a Kantian culture in the West.

4,573 citations

MonographDOI
TL;DR: Hallin and Mancini as discussed by the authors proposed a framework for comparative analysis of the relation between the media and the political system, based on a survey of media institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies.
Abstract: This book proposes a framework for comparative analysis of the relation between the media and the political system Building on a survey of media institutions in eighteen West European and North American democracies, Hallin and Mancini identify the principal dimensions of variation in media systems and the political variables that have shaped their evolution They go on to identify three major models of media system development, the Polarized Pluralist, Democratic Corporatist, and Liberal models; to explain why the media have played a different role in politics in each of these systems; and to explore the force of change that are currently transforming them It provides a key theoretical statement about the relation between media and political systems, a key statement about the methodology of comparative analysis in political communication, and a clear overview of the variety of media institutions that have developed in the West, understood within their political and historical context

4,541 citations

Book
01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: In this paper, Veto players analysis of European Union Institutions is presented, focusing on the role of individual veto players and collective players in the analysis of the institutions of the European Union.
Abstract: List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Preface and Acknowledgments xiii Introduction 1 PART I: VETO PLAYERS THEORY 17 One: Individual Veto Players 19 Two: Collective Veto Players 38 PART II: VETO PLAYERS AND INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 65 Three: Regimes: Nondemocratic, Presidential, and Parliamentary 67 Four: Governments and Parliaments 91 Five: Referendums 116 Six: Federalism, Bicameralism, and Qualified Majorities 136 PART III: POLICY EFFECTS OF VETO PLAYERS 161 Seven: Legislation 165 Eight: Macroeconomic Policies 187 PART IV: SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF VETO PLAYERS 207 Nine: Government Stability 209 Ten: Judiciary and Bureaucracies 222 Eleven: Veto Players Analysis of European Union Institutions 248 Conclusion 283 Bibliography 291 Index 309

2,983 citations