scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Giuseppe Mancia published in 2007"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension : The Task Force for the management of Arterspertension of the European Society ofhypertension (ESH) and of theEuropean Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Abstract: 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension : The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

9,932 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Authors/Task Force Members: Giuseppe Mancia, co-Chairperson (Italy), Guy De Backer, Co-Chair person (Belgium), Anna Dominiczak (UK), Renata Cifkova (Czech Republic), Robert Fagard (Belgian), Giuseppi Germano (Italy) and Guido Grassi (Italy).
Abstract: Authors/Task Force Members: Giuseppe Mancia, Co-Chairperson (Italy), Guy De Backer, Co-Chairperson (Belgium), Anna Dominiczak (UK), Renata Cifkova (Czech Republic), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Giuseppe Germano (Italy), Guido Grassi (Italy), Anthony M. Heagerty (UK), Sverre E. Kjeldsen (Norway), Stephane Laurent (France), Krzysztof Narkiewicz (Poland), Luis Ruilope (Spain), Andrzej Rynkiewicz (Poland), Roland E. Schmieder (Germany), Harry A.J. Struijker Boudier (Netherlands), Alberto Zanchetti (Italy)

1,992 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society Of Cardiology (ESC) as mentioned in this paper decided not to produce their own guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension but to endorse the guidelines on hypertension issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Society of hypertension (ISH)1,2 with some adaptation to reflect the situation in Europe.
Abstract: For several years the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) decided not to produce their own guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension but to endorse the guidelines on hypertension issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Society of Hypertension (ISH)1,2 with some adaptation to reflect the situation in Europe. However, in 2003 the decision was taken to publish ESH/ESC specific guidelines3 based on the fact that, because the WHO/ISH Guidelines address countries widely varying in the extent of their health care and availability of economic resource, they contain diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations that may be not totally appropriate for European countries. In Europe care provisions may often allow a more in-depth diagnostic assessment of cardiovascular risk and organ damage of hypertensive individuals as well as a wider choice of antihypertensive treatment. The 2003 ESH/ESC Guidelines3 were well received by the clinical world and have been the most widely quoted paper in the medical literature in the last two years.4 However, since 2003 considerable additional evidence on important issues related to diagnostic and treatment approaches to hypertension has become available and therefore updating of the previous guidelines has been found advisable. In preparing the new guidelines the Committee established by the ESH and ESC has agreed to adhere to the principles informing the 2003 Guidelines, namely 1) to try to offer the best available and most balanced recommendation to all health care providers involved in the management of hypertension, 2) to address this aim again by an extensive and critical review of the data accompanied by a series of boxes where specific recommendations are given, as well as by a concise set of practice recommendations to be published soon thereafter as already done in 2003; …

1,760 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Because arterial stiffening and central hemodynamics are markers and manifestations of organ damage, the pertinent key question is whether the balance of evidence on their importance and issues related to clinical practice allows for implementation in patient management.
Abstract: The 2003 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension1 included 2 important novel recommendations: assessment of the total cardiovascular risk should be taken into account in the management of the hypertensive patient, and quantification of risk should include subclinical target organ damage. These guidelines acknowledged that central (aortic) blood pressure (BP), which is the pressure exerted on the heart and brain, may be different from the pressure that is measured at the arm. They also recognized that central pressure may be predictive of outcome in specific populations2 and differently affected by antihypertensive drugs. However, although these guidelines accepted that central augmentation index and pulse wave velocity may be important as measures of subclinical organ damage, they also stressed the need for prospective trials to establish their predictive values given that such studies were lacking at that time (2003). After publication of these guidelines, additional data have strengthened the pathophysiological importance of central BP. Clinical studies have indicated that central BP may have predictive value independent of the corresponding peripheral (brachial) BP. More importantly, recent large-scale trials have shown that central hemodynamics may provide a worthwhile treatment target. In addition, central hemodynamics can now be reliably assessed noninvasively with a number of devices. Accordingly, because arterial stiffening and central hemodynamics are markers and manifestations of organ damage, the pertinent key question is whether the balance of evidence on their importance and issues related to clinical practice allows for implementation in patient management. Central (aortic and carotid) pressures are pathophysiologically more relevant than peripheral pressures for the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease.3,4 It is aortic systolic pressure that the left ventricle encounters during systole (afterload), and the aortic pressure during diastole is a determinant of coronary perfusion. Furthermore, the distending pressure in the …

602 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The behaviour of the sympathetic nervous system in the metabolic syndrome as well as the mechanisms potentially responsible for this neurogenic abnormality are examined.
Abstract: Studies performed in the past two decades have unequivocally shown that several of the components of the metabolic syndrome are associated with indirect and direct markers of adrenergic overdrive. This is the case for hypertension and obesity, in which resting tachycardia, elevated plasma norepinephrine values, increased sympathetic nerve traffic, as well as augmented levels of total and regional norepinephrine spillover have been reported. This is also the case for insulin resistance, i.e. a metabolic condition frequently complicating the various components of the pathological condition identified as the 'metabolic syndrome'. After briefly describing the epidemiological and the cardiovascular risk profile of the disease, this paper will examine the behaviour of the sympathetic nervous system in the metabolic syndrome as well as the mechanisms potentially responsible for this neurogenic abnormality. This will be followed by an analysis of the role played by neuroadrenergic factors in disease progression as well as in the pathogenesis of its complications. Finally, the therapeutic implications of these findings will be highlighted.

387 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data show that the relationship of blood pressure to prognosis is complex and that phenomena other than 24-hour mean values are involved, and provide the first evidence that short-term erratic components of blood Pressure variability play a prognostic role.
Abstract: The hypothesis has been advanced that cardiovascular prognosis is related not only to 24-hour mean blood pressure but also to blood pressure variability. Data, however, are inconsistent, and no long-term prognostic study is available. In 2012 individuals randomly selected from the population of Monza (Milan), 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (Spacelabs 90207) was measured via readings spaced by 20 minutes. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability was obtained by calculating the following: (1) the SD of 24-hour, day, and night mean values; (2) the day-night blood pressure difference; and (3) the residual or erratic blood pressure variability (Fourier spectral analysis). Fatal cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events were registered for 148 months. When adjusted for age, sex, 24-hour mean blood pressure, and other risk factors, there was no relationship between the risk of death and 24-hour, day, and night blood pressure SDs. In contrast, the adjusted risk of cardiovascular death was inversely related to day-night diastolic BP difference (beta coefficient=-0.040; P<0.02) and showed a significant positive relationship with residual diastolic blood pressure variability (beta coefficient=0.175; P<0.002). Twenty-four-hour mean blood pressure attenuation of nocturnal hypotension and erratic diastolic blood pressure variability all independently predicted the mortality risk, with the erratic variability being the most important factor. Our data show that the relationship of blood pressure to prognosis is complex and that phenomena other than 24-hour mean values are involved. They also provide the first evidence that short-term erratic components of blood pressure variability play a prognostic role, with their increase being accompanied by an increased cardiovascular risk.

349 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The WHO/ISH risk predication charts presented here, enable the prediction of future risk of heart attacks and strokes in people living in low and middle income countries, for the first time.
Abstract: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of the growing global disease burden due to non-communicable diseases. For successful prevention and control of CVD, strategies that focus on individuals need to complement population-wide strategies. Strategies that focus on individuals are cost effective only when targeted at high-risk groups. Risk prediction tools that easily and accurately predict an individual's absolute risk of CVD are key to targeting limited resources at high-risk individuals who are likely to benefit the most. Health systems in low-income countries do not have the basic infrastructure facilities to support resource-intensive risk prediction tools, particularly in primary healthcare. The WHO/ISH charts presented here, enable the prediction of future risk of heart attacks and strokes in people living in low and middle income countries, for the first time. Furthermore, since the charts use simple variables they can be applied even in low resource settings. Thus the WHO/ISH risk predication charts and the accompanying guideline will improve the effectiveness of cardiovascular risk management even in settings which do not have sophisticated technology.

314 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its relationship with daily life blood pressure, cardiac damage, and prognosis were determined in 2013 subjects from a Northern Italian population aged 25 to 74 years as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria) and its relationships with daily life blood pressures, cardiac damage, and prognosis were determined in 2013 subjects from a Northern Italian population aged 25 to 74 years. Home blood pressure, 24-hour blood pressure, and left ventricular mass index (echocardiography) were also measured. Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deaths were registered over 148 months. Metabolic syndrome was found in 16.2% of the sample, an office blood pressure elevation being the most frequent (95.4%) and the blood glucose abnormality the least frequent (31.5%) component. There was in metabolic syndrome a frequent elevation in home and/or 24-hour average blood pressure, as well as a greater left ventricular mass index and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, which was manifest even when data were adjusted for between-group differences, including blood pressure. The adjusted risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was greater in metabolic syndrome subjects (+71.0% and +37.0%; P<0.05), a further marked increase being observed with left ventricular hypertrophy or "in-office" and "out-of-office" blood pressure elevations. The increased risk was related to the blood pressure and the blood glucose component of metabolic syndrome, with no contribution of the remaining components. Thus, metabolic syndrome is common in a Mediterranean population in which it significantly increases the long-term risk of death. Cardiac abnormalities and increases in home and 24-hour blood pressure are common in metabolic syndrome, and their occurrence further enhances the risk. The contribution of metabolic syndrome components to the risk, however, is unbalanced and mainly related to blood pressure and glucose abnormalities.

232 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new method for computing 24-h BP variability, devoid of the contribution from nocturnal BP fall is proposed, which removes the mathematical interference from night-time BP fall and correlates better with end-organ damage, therefore it may be considered as a simple index of 24- h BP variability superior to conventional 24-H SD.
Abstract: ObjectivesTo assess quantitatively the relationship between nocturnal blood pressure (BP) fall and 24-h BP variability; to propose a new method for computing 24-h BP variability, devoid of the contribution from nocturnal BP fall; and to verify the clinical value of this method.Methods and resultsWe

203 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: As proportion of visits with BP control increases, there is an associated steep reduction in cardiovascular risk, independent of baseline characteristics and mean on-treatment BP.
Abstract: Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) increases cardiovascular risk, independent of type of treatment. In this posthoc International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study analysis, we determined whether adverse outcomes are related to consistency of BP control, defined as the proportion of visits in which BP was in control. A total of 22 576 patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease were divided into 4 groups according to the proportion of visits in which BP was in control ( or=75%. Risk of primary outcome (first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), myocardial infarction, and stroke decreased progressively from the group with or=75% of visits with BP control. Adjusted risks of primary outcome (heart rate: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.67), myocardial infarction (heart rate: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.70), and stroke (heart rate: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.67) were less in the group with >or=75% of visits with BP control compared with the group with <25% of visits with BP control. Baseline BP was not predictive of outcomes. Proportion of visits with BP control was associated with mean follow-up systolic BP (r(2)=0.64), both being independently related to primary outcome. As proportion of visits with BP control increases, there is an associated steep reduction in cardiovascular risk, independent of baseline characteristics and mean on-treatment BP. Consistency of BP control during treatment provides additional information on the protective effect of antihypertensive treatment. Physicians need to be concerned at each visit if BP is not controlled.

Journal Article
TL;DR: Ambulatory- based hypertension control was far better than office-based hypertension control, and the burden of underestimation and overestimation of BP control at the office is still remarkable, which conveys an encouraging message to clinicians.
Abstract: We studied the effectiveness of blood pressure (BP) control outside the clinic by using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) among a large number of hypertensive subjects treated in primary care centers across Spain. The sample consisted of 12 897 treated hypertensive subjects who had indications for ABPM. Office-based BP was calculated as the average of 2 readings. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was then performed using a SpaceLabs 90207 monitor under standardized conditions. A total of 3047 patients (23.6%) had their office BP controlled, and 6657 (51.6%) were controlled according to daytime ABPM. The proportion of office resistance or underestimation of patients' BP control by physicians in the office (office BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and average daytime ambulatory BP <135/85 mm Hg) was 33.4%, and the proportion of isolated office control or overestimation of control (office BP <140/90 mm Hg and average daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85 mm Hg) was 5.4%. BP control was more frequently underestimated in patients who were older, female, obese, or with morning BP determination than in their counterparts. BP control was more frequently overestimated in those who were younger, male, nonobese, smokers, or with evening BP determination. Ambulatory-based hypertension control was far better than office-based hypertension control. This conveys an encouraging message to clinicians, namely that they are actually doing better than is evidenced by office-based data. However, the burden of underestimation and overestimation of BP control at the office is still remarkable. Physicians should be aware that the likelihood of misestimating BP control is higher in some hypertensive subjects.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Homeostasis model assessment index was increased in patients with in- and out-of-office and white-coat hypertension, with a further increase in masked hypertension and a direct relation with resting sympathetic nerve traffic.
Abstract: Patients with hypertension exhibit an increased sympathetic activity. No information exists as to whether this is the case in normotensive individuals in whom there is an increased ambulatory blood pressure, a condition termed “masked” hypertension. We studied 18 middle-aged subjects with masked hypertension in whom we measured muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (peroneal nerve and microneurography) and beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure at rest and during baroreceptor deactivation and activation. Measurements also included anthropometric values and insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment index). Data were compared with those of 20 normotensive subjects, 18 subjects with white-coat hypertension, and 20 patients with “in-office” and “out-of-office” hypertension. All of the individuals were pharmacologically untreated and age-matched with subjects with masked hypertension. Patients with in- and out-of-office and white-coat hypertension displayed resting sympathetic nerve activity values significantly greater than normotensive subjects (75.8±2.5 and 70.8±2.2 versus 45.5±2.0 bursts per 100 heartbeats respectively; P P r =0.46; P

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The analysis demonstrates the persistence of poor BP control and high prevalence of risk factors, supporting the need for more effective, comprehensive and urgent actions to improve the clinical management of hypertension.
Abstract: BackgroundBlood pressure (BP) control is reported to be poor in hypertensive patients worldwide.ObjectiveBP levels, the rate of BP control, prevalence of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk were assessed in a large cohort of hypertensive patients, derived from recent surveys performed in Ital

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The risk of MS is greater in HIV-infected patients compared with the general population because of a greater prevalence of lipid and glucose abnormalities.
Abstract: Objective: To compare the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in HIV-positive patients with that from a sample of a general Italian population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 1263 HIV-infected patients 18 years of age or older were recruited in 18 centers for infectious diseases in northern and central Italy. Controls were 2051 subjects aged 25 to 74 years representative of the residents of Monza, a town in Milan province, who were enrolled in the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni study. Results: The prevalence of MS in the HIV group was 20.8%, whereas in the control group, it was only 15.8%, with the difference being statistically significant. The age- and gender-adjusted risk of having MS in HIV-infected patients was twice as great as that in controls. Compared with controls, HIV-infected patients had a greater prevalence of the impaired fasting glucose, increased plasma triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol components. MS prevalence was similar in treated and never-treated HIV-infected patients, and so were the various MS components. Conclusions: The risk of MS is greater in HIV-infected patients compared with the general population because of a greater prevalence of lipid and glucose abnormalities. The prevalence of MS and its components is similar in treated and untreated HIV-positive patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Obesity and metabolic syndrome potentiate the sympathetic activation characterizing heart failure, and waist circumference and body mass index were the variables most closely related to sympathetic activation.
Abstract: Congestive heart failure is characterized by sympathetic activation, which has also been described in the metabolic syndrome. No information exists, however, as to whether the sympathostimulating effects of these 2 conditions summate when heart failure is complicated by the metabolic syndrome, leading to an exceedingly high adrenergic drive. This is clinically relevant, because in heart failure sympathetic activation is closely related to mortality. We studied 48 control subjects (age: 58.4±1.6 years, mean±SEM) and 89 age-matched heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class II), of whom 47 were without and 42 were with metabolic syndrome. Measurements included blood pressure (Finapres), heart rate (ECG), and sympathetic nerve traffic (microneurography) at rest and during baroreceptor manipulation. Waist circumference, blood pressure, and metabolic variables were greater in heart failure with metabolic syndrome than in heart failure without metabolic syndrome and in control subjects. Left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic diameter were similarly altered in the 2 heart failure groups. Compared with control subjects, sympathetic nerve activity was greater in heart failure patients without metabolic syndrome (64.7±3.2 versus 45.8±2.9 bursts/100 heartbeats; P P


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: On average, ABP was sustainedly reduced by treatment throughout the follow-up period, but 24-h BP was more difficult to control than CBP, and the best evidence available is provided on long-term effect of antihypertensive treatment on both ABP and CBP.
Abstract: Objectives Information on the features of long-term modifications of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) by treatment is limited. The present study aimed to address this issue. Methods Ambulatory BP monitoring and clinic BP (CBP) measurements were performed at baseline and at yearly intervals over a 4-year follow-up period in 1523 hypertensives (56.1 ± 7.6 years) randomized to treatment with lacidipine or atenolol in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA). Results CBP was always greater than ABP, while reductions in all BP values (greater for CBP than for ABP) were on average maintained throughout 4 years, CBP changes showing limited relationship with ABP changes (r = 0.14–0.27). BP reductions by treatment during daytime and night-time were correlated (r = 0.63–0.73). BP normalization was achieved in a greater percentage of patients for CBP (41.7%) than for ABP (25.3%), with systolic BP control being always less common than diastolic BP control. BP normalization was more frequent at single yearly visits than throughout the 4 years. Twenty-four-hour BP variability was reduced by treatment over 4 years in absolute but not in normalized units. Conclusions The present study provides the best evidence available on long-term effect of antihypertensive treatment on both ABP and CBP. On average, ABP was sustainedly reduced by treatment throughout the follow-up period, but 24-h BP was more difficult to control than CBP. In several patients, ABP control was unstable between visits, the percentage of patients under control over 4 years being much less than that of those controlled at each year. Treatment induced a reduction in absolute but not in normalized BP variability estimates. This has clinical implications because of the prognostic importance of ABP mean values and variability.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In ELSA lacidipine was superior to atenolol, not only in showing a lower progression of carotid atherosclerosis, but also in causing a significantly lower incidence of new MS.
Abstract: BackgroundThe European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) randomized 2334 hypertensive patients to either the lipophilic calcium antagonist lacidipine or the β-blocker atenolol for 4 years. About 35% of subjects in both groups received additional hydrochlorothiazide (12.5–25 mg/day). The pat

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: CHF and diastolic dysfunction are highly prevalent in elderly hypertensives attending hospital clinics and multiple logistic regression analysis found age, gender, left ventricular mass, systolic and pulse pressures and midwall shortening fraction as significant covariates.
Abstract: BackgroundA number of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have diastolic but not systolic dysfunction. This occurs particularly in the elderly and in hypertension, but the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in elderly hypertensives without CHF has never been investigated systematically.Method

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In hypertensive patients the MS amplifies TOD regardless of patient's age, thus increasing cardiovascular risk and this synergistic effect may accelerate the early development of TOD in young hypertensives and enhance the age-associated cardiovascular alterations in the elderly.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: On-pump CABG surgery is associated with an intense systemic inflammatory response, which can be almost completely prevented by early treatment with high (but not standard) doses of ACE-inhibitors and statins.
Abstract: Background— On-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery triggers an inflammatory response (IR) which may impair revascularization The study aimed at (1) characterizing the temporal profile of the IR by assaying appropriate markers in both systemic and coronary blood, and (2) determining whether (and which doses of) cardiovascular drugs known to have antiinflammatory properties, namely statins and ACE-inhibitors (ACEI), inhibit the response Methods and Results— Patients scheduled for CABG (n=22) were randomized to statin/ACEI combination treatment at standard doses (STD, ramipril 25/simvastatin 20 mg, or atorvastatin 10 mg), or at high doses (HiDo, ramipril 10 mg, or enalapril 20 mg/simvastatin 80 mg, or atorvastatin 40 mg) Plasma levels of interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, E-selectin, von Willebrand factor (vWF), and sVCAM-1 were serially assayed (ELISA) before, during, and after CABG Blood was drawn from an artery, a systemic vein, and the coronary sinus Myocardial perfusion scans were obtained before and 2 months after surgery in 19 out of 22 subjects In the STD group both IL-6 and TNF displayed striking increases which were similar at all sites and peaked 10 to 60 minutes after aortic declamping Such increases were drastically attenuated in the HiDo group Instead, only modest increases in venous E-selectin, vWF, and sVCAM-1 were observed Scintigraphic ischemia scores were entirely normalized after versus before CABG in the HiDo but not in the STD treatment group Conclusions— On-pump CABG surgery is associated with an intense systemic inflammatory response, which can be almost completely prevented by early treatment with high (but not standard) doses of ACE-inhibitors and statins

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Optimal blood pressure control may have to include the measurement of blood pressure every day, given the fluctuations ofBlood pressure and their prognostic importance independent of and in addition to that of classically measured blood pressure values.
Abstract: Hypertension has not always been recognized as a harbinger of cardiovascular complications and premature death. Only 70 years ago, hypertension was considered the body's adaptation to sclerotic blood vessel disease and essential to maintain organ perfusion; thus, treatment was regarded as undesirable. Epidemiologic studies have since established a strong linear relation between blood pressure and cardiovascular disease (CVD), and randomized trials have documented that blood pressure reductions by antihypertensive drugs confer cardiovascular protection, making the hypertension-related risk a reversible risk. There is now a consensus that blood pressure should be reduced to <140/90 mm Hg in all patients and that a more aggressive blood pressure target (<130/80 mm Hg) should be pursued in those in whom the cardiovascular risk is high. Despite this, blood pressure control remains elusive in most individuals in the hypertensive population, which makes improvement of blood pressure control in this population a priority goal. This goal may meet with new challenges, however. Optimal blood pressure control may have to include the measurement of blood pressure every day, given the fluctuations of blood pressure and their prognostic importance independent of and in addition to that of classically measured blood pressure values.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings do not support the role of SUA as an independent risk factor for subclinical TOD in a selected population of recently diagnosed uncomplicated hypertensives at low prevalence of hyperuricemia.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings indicate that nocturnal blood pressure patterns have a limited short-term reproducibility in the whole study population as well as in different age and sex subgroups.
Abstract: ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the intrasubject short-term reproducibility of nocturnal blood pressure patterns (dipping/nondipping) in essential hypertensive patients in relation to age (<50 and ≥50 years) and sex.MethodsA total of 619 never-treated essential grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients (383

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Combination antihypertensive therapy is superior to more conventional strategies, and is now considered necessary to achieve rapid blood pressure control in patients with diabetes and hypertension.
Abstract: In patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal events, including macro and microvascular complications such as nephropathy. The risks are reduced when blood pressure is decreased, regardless of the treatment regimen, and intensive regimens have been found to offer greater protection than less intensive regimens. Reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure to values less than 130/80 mmHg offers the most promising degree of protection, and antihypertensive therapy should be started in patients with diabetes with blood pressure greater than these values or at least in the high normal (>or= 130/85 mmHg) blood pressure range. This target lower blood pressure has typically been difficult to obtain, however, with clinical trials failing to achieve an SBP of less than 130 mmHg and blood pressure control rates in patients with diabetes only half those observed in those without diabetes. Combination antihypertensive therapy is superior to more conventional strategies, and is now considered necessary to achieve rapid blood pressure control in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Recent data have indicated that blood pressure control is more complex than previously believed. An individual's blood pressure can vary over time as a result of variations in biorhythms, methods of blood pressure measurement and central versus peripheral blood pressure; these factors therefore need to be taken into consideration when interpreting blood pressure results.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Fixed low‐dose combinations are becoming more and more popular and are even proposed by current hypertension guidelines as a first‐line option to treat hypertensive patients.
Abstract: Summary Pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a cost-effective way for preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. To benefit maximally from antihypertensive treatment blood pressure (BP) should be brought to below 140/90 mmHg in every hypertensive patient, and even lower (< 130/80 mmHg) if diabetes or renal disease co-exists. Most of the time such targets cannot be reached using monotherapies. This is especially true in patients who exhibit a high cardiovascular risk. The co-administration of two agents acting by different mechanisms considerably increases BP control. Such preparations are not only efficacious, but also well tolerated, and some fixed low-dose combinations have a tolerability profile similar to placebo. This is for instance the case for the preparation containing the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (2 mg) and the diuretic indapamide (0.625 mg), a fixed low-dose combination that has recently been shown in controlled interventional trials to be more effective than monotherapies in reducing albuminuria, regressing cardiac hypertrophy and improving macrovascular stiffness. Fixed-dose combinations are becoming more and more popular and are even proposed by current hypertension guidelines as a first-line option to treat hypertensive patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In these elderly high-risk patients, diastolic ABP levels tended to be less predictive than systolic, and daytime more predictive than night-time for all cardiovascular endpoints.
Abstract: ObjectiveThe ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring substudy of the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was carried out in a subset of patients from USA, Italy and Denmark. ABP was measured after 1 year in the trial, with the aim of evaluating comparability of ABP l

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Large elastic artery (and in particular aortic) stiffening can be considered as a marker of the severity of coronary atherosclerosis, providing non-invasive obtainable information on the need to proceed with further clinical examinations.
Abstract: ObjectiveArterial stiffening is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease However, limited evidence exists on whether it also relates to subclinical atherosclerosis, thereby providing a non-invasive marker of the overall cardiovascular status The aim of the present study was to p

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings clearly indicate that the classification of ICH on the basis of a single ABPM, using the cut-offs suggested by major hypertension guidelines, has a limited short-term reproducibility and repeated ABPM recordings should be recommended to correctly diagnose patients with ICH and improve cardiovascular risk stratification.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Isolated clinical hypertension (ICH) is characterized by a persistently elevated clinic blood pressure in the presence of a normal day-time or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). This definition is based on a single ABP monitoring (ABPM) and little attention has been focused on the reproducibility of this condition. OBJECTIVE To investigate the reliability of the criteria currently recommended by major hypertension guidelines to detect ICH based on a single 24-h ABPM session. METHODS A total of 611 never-treated grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients (mean age 46 +/- 12 years) referred for the first time to our out-patient clinic, underwent repeated clinic blood pressure measurements, routine investigations, two 24-h periods of ABPM 1-4 weeks apart, cardiac and carotid ultrasound examinations. ABPM was always performed over a working day and the same daily activities were recommended during the two periods. ICH was diagnosed by the following criteria: (i) mean daytime values < 135/85 mmHg or (ii) mean 24-h blood pressure values < 125/80 mmHg during the first ABPM. RESULTS The overall prevalence of ICH was 7.1% according to criterion (i) and 5.4% according to criterion (ii). Twenty (46.6%) of the 43 patients with mean daytime blood pressure values < 135/85 mmHg during the first ABPM, exceeded this cut-off value during the second ABPM period. Twenty-two (66.6%) of the 33 patients with mean 24-h blood pressure values < 120/80 mmHg during the first ABPM did not confirm a normal blood pressure profile during the second ABPM recording. Cardiovascular involvement was significantly lower in subjects with persistent normal ABP compared to those with non-reproducible ICH pattern or sustained hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS These findings clearly indicate that: (i) the classification of ICH on the basis of a single ABPM, using the cut-offs suggested by major hypertension guidelines, has a limited short-term reproducibility and (ii) repeated ABPM recordings should be recommended to correctly diagnose patients with ICH and improve cardiovascular risk stratification.