Govindjee

Bio: Govindjee is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. The author has contributed to research in topics: Photosystem II & Photosynthesis. The author has an hindex of 76, co-authored 426 publications receiving 21800 citations. Previous affiliations of Govindjee include Leiden University & Allahabad University.

POLYPHASIC CHLOROPHYLL a FLUORESCENCE TRANSIENT IN PLANTS AND CYANOBACTERIA

Abstract: The variable chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence yield is known to be related to the photochemical activity of photosystem I1 (PSII) of oxygen-evolving organisms. The kinetics of the fluorescence rise from the minimum yield, F,, to the maximum yield, F,, is a monitor of the accumulation of net reduced primary bound plastoquinone (QA) with time in all the PSII centers. Using a shutter-less system (Plant Efficiency Analyzer, Hansatech, UK), which allows data accumulation over several orders of magnitude of time (40 11s to 120 s), we have measured on a logarithmic time scale, for the first time, the complete polyphasic fluorescence rise for a variety of oxygenic plants and cyanobacteria at different light intensities. With increasing light intensity, the fluorescence rise is changed from a typical 0-I-P characteristic to curves with two intermediate levels J and I, both of which show saturation at high light intensity but different intensity dependence. Under physiological conditions, Chl a fluorescence transients of all the organisms examined follow the sequence of 0-J-I-P. The characteristics of the kinetics with respect to light intensity and temperature suggest that the 0-J phase is the photochemical phase, leading to the reduction of QA to QA-. The intermediate level I is suggested to be related to a heterogeneity in the filling up of the plastoquinone pool. The P is reached when all the plastoquinone (PQ) molecules are reduced to PQH2. The addition of 3-(3-4-dichIorophenyl)- 1,l -dimethylurea leads to a transformation of the 0-J-I-P rise into an 0-J rise. The kinetics of 0-J-I-P observed here was found to be similar to that of 0-1,-12-P, reported by Neubauer and Schreiber (2. Naturforsch. 42c, 1246-1254, 1987). The biochemical significance of the fluorescence steps 0-J-I-P with respect to the filling up of the plasto- quinone pool by PSII reactions is discussed.

On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and Photosystem II: basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient.

Abstract: Chlorophyll a fluorescence is a highly sensitive, non-destructive, and reliable tool for measuring, rather quickly, photosynthetic efficiency, particularly of Photosystem II (PSII), the water-plastoquinone oxidoreductase. We briefly review here the connection between the fast (up to 2 s) chlorophyll fluorescence rise and PSII, as well as the empirical use of the fluorescence rise kinetics in understanding photosynthetic reactions, particularly of PSII. When dark-adapted photosynthetic samples are exposed to light, a fluorescence induction is observed, known as the Kautsky effect, after Hans Kautsky, the discoverer of the phenomenon showing the existence of variable fluorescence. The chlorophyll fluorescence intensity rises from a minimum level (the O level), in less than 1 s, to a maximum level (the P-level) via two intermediate steps labeled J and I. This is followed by a decline to a lower semi-steady state level, the S level, which is reached in about one minute. We provide here an educational review on how this phenomenon has been exploited through analysis of the fast OJIP fluorescence transient, by discussing basic assumptions, derivation of equations, as well as application to PSII-related questions.

Chlorophyll a Fluorescence

Abstract: Why should a book on chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence appeal to people who work on algae? At first sight there might seem to be a nexus between the two subjects. However, on reflection the two are intimately bound up. The algae are par excellence the great players in the field of photosynthetic pigments. After all, we still classify several groups of algae on their colouration. Just imagine if we tried to classify other protists in the same way! And whether they use red pigments, brown or green, all algae use Chl a as their central photochemical pigment. If you count cyanobacteria as algae there is now one possible exception to this rule: Acaryochloris marina (see below), where Chl d may totally replace Chl a. However, apart from that they all use Chl a. As a result the many types of other photosynthetic pigments in algae perform all kinds of dances with the central Chl a and the result is that by studying Chl a fluorescence one can learn a multitude of information that can be of help all the way from taxonomy, to productivity, to global warming. From the foregoing, it is therefore of no surprise that this is a large book. There are thirty-one chapters, by the world’s experts in the field, and the book weighs in at 2.2 Kg and covers 818 pages. This, unfortunately, is too many chapters to pick out each one for special mention, much as the high quality and interest of this book demands it. The book begins with two indispensable chapters by the Editors on the basics of fluorescence in photosynthetic organisms and its history. Luminescence, delayed light emission, goes back a long way; but not the word: it dates from 1897. Undoubtedly the ancients knew about bioluminescence from such things as fireflies, glow worms, particles in the sea (Noctiluca), fish, mushrooms and rotting meat, to name a few; but the ancients used the loose term “phosphorescence” (in various forms), and it is often difficult to pin down exactly what phenomenon was being referred to. Fluorescence, or prompt re-emission of light, is a much more recent word of Victorian origin; the phenomenon was first observed by Sir David Brewster in about 1834 and the word itself was coined by Sir G.G. Stokes in 1852 (from the mineral fluor-spar, which can be made to fluoresce). Based on the multiple associations that this word now conjures up, we have come a long way in 150 years! Many of the chapters in this book are for specialist interested in the physics and biophysics of fluorescence in photosynthetic apparatus, since the reaction centres of each and every photosystem and many of their light-harvesting proteins contain chlorophylls, which fluoresce. Thus there are chapters outlining the basic aspects of excitation energy migration, i.e., how the energy is distributed between the pigments, before fluorescence occur (R.M. Clegg) and trapping of excitation (R. van Grondelle; W.J. Vredenburg) and fluorescence in Photosystem I (S. Itoh and K. Sugiura). Other chapters which need not detain us here deal with such specialist areas as fluorescence in fruit and leaves (L. Nedbal and J. Whitmarsch), water stress (N.G. Bukhov and R. Carpentier), heavy metals toxicity (M.K. Joshi and P. Mohanty), light adaptation and senescence in plants (H.K. Lichtenthaler aand F. Babani) and a global analysis of fluorescence in plants (A Gilmore). Suffice it to say that few areas of interest to the eclectic reader are absent and what is present is of a very high standard.

Light Absorption and Energy Transfer in the Antenna Complexes of Photosynthetic Organisms.

Abstract: The process of photosynthesis is initiated by the capture of sunlight by a network of light-absorbing molecules (chromophores), which are also responsible for the subsequent funneling of the excitation energy to the reaction centers. Through evolution, genetic drift, and speciation, photosynthetic organisms have discovered many solutions for light harvesting. In this review, we describe the underlying photophysical principles by which this energy is absorbed, as well as the mechanisms of electronic excitation energy transfer (EET). First, optical properties of the individual pigment chromophores present in light-harvesting antenna complexes are introduced, and then we examine the collective behavior of pigment−pigment and pigment−protein interactions. The description of energy transfer, in particular multichromophoric antenna structures, is shown to vary depending on the spatial and energetic landscape, which dictates the relative coupling strength between constituent pigment molecules. In the latter half...

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide

Abstract: typically written from a biophysicist’s or a molecular plant physiologist’s point of view (Horton and Bowyer, Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis has become one of 1990; Krause and Weis, 1991; Govindjee, 1995). The aim the most powerful and widely used techniques avail- of this review is to provide a simple, practical guide to able to plant physiologists and ecophysiologists. This chlorophyll fluorescence for those beginners who are review aims to provide an introduction for the novice interested in applying the technique in both field and into the methodology and applications of chlorophyll laboratory situations. Whilst the principles behind the fluorescence. After a brief introduction into the theor- measurements will be discussed briefly, the emphasis will etical background of the technique, the methodology be on the applications and limitations of this technique and some of the technical pitfalls that can be encoun- in plant ecophysiology. tered are explained. A selection of examples is then used to illustrate the types of information that fluorescence can provide. The basis of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements

Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis: The Basics

Abstract: BIOPHYSICAL BASIS O F FLUORESCENCE EMISSION FROM CHLOROPLASTS . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 314 Fluorescence as a Reaction Competing in the Deactivation of Excited Chlorophyll . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314 Lifetimes of Fluorescence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 317 Origin of Fluorescence Emission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 1 Fluorescence of PS 11 and PS I at Ambient and Low Temperatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 FLUORESCENCE INDUCTION AND PS II HETEROGENEITy 325 Fluorescence Transient from Fo to FM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 The FI Level and Inactive PS11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 326 Fluorescence Induction in High Ught .. . . . . . . . . 327 Rise in the Presence of DCMU and a/{3 Heterogeneity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING 329 Resolution of Quenching Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ........ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 Mechanism of Energy·Dependent Quenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 1 Quenching Related t o State Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ......... . . .. .. . . . . . . . 334 Photoinhibitory Quenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 Further Quenching Mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 Physiological Aspects of Quenching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTiVES 341

Methods in Enzymology.

Abstract: I read this book the same weekend that the Packers took on the Rams, and the experience of the latter event, obviously, colored my judgment. Although I abhor anything that smacks of being a handbook (like, \"How to Earn a Merit Badge in Neurosurgery\") because too many volumes in biomedical science already evince a boyscout-like approach, I must confess that parts of this volume are fast, scholarly, and significant, with certain reservations. I like parts of this well-illustrated book because Dr. Sj6strand, without so stating, develops certain subjects on technique in relation to the acquisition of judgment and sophistication. And this is important! So, given that the author (like all of us) is somewhat deficient in some areas, and biased in others, the book is still valuable if the uninitiated reader swallows it in a general fashion, realizing full well that what will be required from the reader is a modulation to fit his vision, propreception, adaptation and response, and the kind of problem he is undertaking. A major deficiency of this book is revealed by comparison of its use of physics and of chemistry to provide understanding and background for the application of high resolution electron microscopy to problems in biology. Since the volume is keyed to high resolution electron microscopy, which is a sophisticated form of structural analysis, but really morphology in a modern guise, the physical and mechanical background of The instrument and its ancillary tools are simply and well presented. The potential use of chemical or cytochemical information as it relates to biological fine structure , however, is quite deficient. I wonder when even sophisticated morphol-ogists will consider fixation a reaction and not a technique; only then will the fundamentals become self-evident and predictable and this sine qua flon will become less mystical. Staining reactions (the most inadequate chapter) ought to be something more than a technique to selectively enhance contrast of morphological elements; it ought to give the structural addresses of some of the chemical residents of cell components. Is it pertinent that auto-radiography gets singled out for more complete coverage than other significant aspects of cytochemistry by a high resolution microscopist, when it has a built-in minimal error of 1,000 A in standard practice? I don't mean to blind-side (in strict football terminology) Dr. Sj6strand's efforts for what is \"routinely used in our laboratory\"; what is done is usually well done. It's just that …