scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Hagop M. Kantarjian

Bio: Hagop M. Kantarjian is an academic researcher from University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Myeloid leukemia & Imatinib mesylate. The author has an hindex of 204, co-authored 3708 publications receiving 210208 citations. Previous affiliations of Hagop M. Kantarjian include Rice University & University of Chicago.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: STI571 is well tolerated and has significant antileukemic activity in patients with CML in whom treatment with interferon alfa had failed and demonstrates the potential for the development of anticancer drugs based on the specific molecular abnormality present in a human cancer.
Abstract: Background BCR-ABL is a constitutively activated tyrosine kinase that causes chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Since tyrosine kinase activity is essential to the transforming function of BCR-ABL, an inhibitor of the kinase could be an effective treatment for CML. Methods We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalating trial of STI571 (formerly known as CGP 57148B), a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. STI571 was administered orally to 83 patients with CML in the chronic phase in whom treatment with interferon alfa had failed. Patients were successively assigned to 1 of 14 doses ranging from 25 to 1000 mg per day. Results Adverse effects of STI571 were minimal; the most common were nausea, myalgias, edema, and diarrhea. A maximal tolerated dose was not identified. Complete hematologic responses were observed in 53 of 54 patients treated with daily doses of 300 mg or more and typically occurred in the first four weeks of therapy. Of the 54 patients treated with doses of 300 mg or more, cytogenetic res...

5,037 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Timothy J. Ley1, Christopher A. Miller1, Li Ding1, Benjamin J. Raphael2, Andrew J. Mungall3, Gordon Robertson3, Katherine A. Hoadley4, Timothy J. Triche5, Peter W. Laird5, Jack Baty1, Lucinda Fulton1, Robert S. Fulton1, Sharon Heath1, Joelle Kalicki-Veizer1, Cyriac Kandoth1, Jeffery M. Klco1, Daniel C. Koboldt1, Krishna L. Kanchi1, Shashikant Kulkarni1, Tamara Lamprecht1, David E. Larson1, G. Lin1, Charles Lu1, Michael D. McLellan1, Joshua F. McMichael1, Jacqueline E. Payton1, Heather Schmidt1, David H. Spencer1, Michael H. Tomasson1, John W. Wallis1, Lukas D. Wartman1, Mark A. Watson1, John S. Welch1, Michael C. Wendl1, Adrian Ally3, Miruna Balasundaram3, Inanc Birol3, Yaron S.N. Butterfield3, Readman Chiu3, Andy Chu3, Eric Chuah3, Hye Jung E. Chun3, Richard Corbett3, Noreen Dhalla3, Ranabir Guin3, An He3, Carrie Hirst3, Martin Hirst3, Robert A. Holt3, Steven J.M. Jones3, Aly Karsan3, Darlene Lee3, Haiyan I. Li3, Marco A. Marra3, Michael Mayo3, Richard A. Moore3, Karen Mungall3, Jeremy Parker3, Erin Pleasance3, Patrick Plettner3, Jacquie Schein3, Dominik Stoll3, Lucas Swanson3, Angela Tam3, Nina Thiessen3, Richard Varhol3, Natasja Wye3, Yongjun Zhao3, Stacey Gabriel6, Gad Getz6, Carrie Sougnez6, Lihua Zou6, Mark D.M. Leiserson2, Fabio Vandin2, Hsin-Ta Wu2, Frederick Applebaum7, Stephen B. Baylin8, Rehan Akbani9, Bradley M. Broom9, Ken Chen9, Thomas C. Motter9, Khanh Thi-Thuy Nguyen9, John N. Weinstein9, Nianziang Zhang9, Martin L. Ferguson, Christopher Adams10, Aaron D. Black10, Jay Bowen10, Julie M. Gastier-Foster10, Thomas Grossman10, Tara M. Lichtenberg10, Lisa Wise10, Tanja Davidsen11, John A. Demchok11, Kenna R. Mills Shaw11, Margi Sheth11, Heidi J. Sofia, Liming Yang11, James R. Downing, Greg Eley, Shelley Alonso12, Brenda Ayala12, Julien Baboud12, Mark Backus12, Sean P. Barletta12, Dominique L. Berton12, Anna L. Chu12, Stanley Girshik12, Mark A. Jensen12, Ari B. Kahn12, Prachi Kothiyal12, Matthew C. Nicholls12, Todd Pihl12, David Pot12, Rohini Raman12, Rashmi N. Sanbhadti12, Eric E. Snyder12, Deepak Srinivasan12, Jessica Walton12, Yunhu Wan12, Zhining Wang12, Jean Pierre J. Issa13, Michelle M. Le Beau14, Martin Carroll15, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Steven M. Kornblau, Moiz S. Bootwalla5, Phillip H. Lai5, Hui Shen5, David Van Den Berg5, Daniel J. Weisenberger5, Daniel C. Link1, Matthew J. Walter1, Bradley A. Ozenberger11, Elaine R. Mardis1, Peter Westervelt1, Timothy A. Graubert1, John F. DiPersio1, Richard K. Wilson1 
TL;DR: It is found that a complex interplay of genetic events contributes to AML pathogenesis in individual patients and the databases from this study are widely available to serve as a foundation for further investigations of AMl pathogenesis, classification, and risk stratification.
Abstract: BACKGROUND—Many mutations that contribute to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are undefined The relationships between patterns of mutations and epigenetic phenotypes are not yet clear METHODS—We analyzed the genomes of 200 clinically annotated adult cases of de novo AML, using either whole-genome sequencing (50 cases) or whole-exome sequencing (150 cases), along with RNA and microRNA sequencing and DNA-methylation analysis RESULTS—AML genomes have fewer mutations than most other adult cancers, with an average of only 13 mutations found in genes Of these, an average of 5 are in genes that are recurrently mutated in AML A total of 23 genes were significantly mutated, and another 237 were mutated in two or more samples Nearly all samples had at least 1 nonsynonymous mutation in one of nine categories of genes that are almost certainly relevant for pathogenesis, including transcriptionfactor fusions (18% of cases), the gene encoding nucleophosmin (NPM1) (27%), tumorsuppressor genes (16%), DNA-methylation–related genes (44%), signaling genes (59%), chromatin-modifying genes (30%), myeloid transcription-factor genes (22%), cohesin-complex genes (13%), and spliceosome-complex genes (14%) Patterns of cooperation and mutual exclusivity suggested strong biologic relationships among several of the genes and categories CONCLUSIONS—We identified at least one potential driver mutation in nearly all AML samples and found that a complex interplay of genetic events contributes to AML pathogenesis in individual patients The databases from this study are widely available to serve as a foundation for further investigations of AML pathogenesis, classification, and risk stratification (Funded by the National Institutes of Health) The molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been studied with the use of cytogenetic analysis for more than three decades Recurrent chromosomal structural variations are well established as diagnostic and prognostic markers, suggesting that acquired genetic abnormalities (ie, somatic mutations) have an essential role in pathogenesis 1,2 However, nearly 50% of AML samples have a normal karyotype, and many of these genomes lack structural abnormalities, even when assessed with high-density comparative genomic hybridization or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays 3-5 (see Glossary) Targeted sequencing has identified recurrent mutations in FLT3, NPM1, KIT, CEBPA, and TET2 6-8 Massively parallel sequencing enabled the discovery of recurrent mutations in DNMT3A 9,10 and IDH1 11 Recent studies have shown that many patients with

3,980 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Imatinib was superior to interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine as first-line therapy in newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML and was better tolerated than combination therapy.
Abstract: Background Imatinib, a selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, produces high response rates in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have had no response to interferon alfa. We compared the efficacy of imatinib with that of interferon alfa combined with low-dose cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Methods We randomly assigned 1106 patients to receive imatinib (553 patients) or interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine (553 patients). Crossover to the alternative group was allowed if stringent criteria defining treatment failure or intolerance were met. Patients were evaluated for hematologic and cytogenetic responses, toxic effects, and rates of progression. Results After a median follow-up of 19 months, the estimated rate of a major cytogenetic response (0 to 35 percent of cells in metaphase positive for the Philadelphia chromosome) at 18 months was 87.1 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 84.1 to 90.0) in the imatinib group and 34.7 percent (95 perce...

3,399 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: After 5 years of follow-up, continuous treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib as initial therapy was found to induce durable responses in a high proportion of patients.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The cause of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a constitutively active BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. Imatinib inhibits this kinase, and in a short-term study was superior to interferon alfa ...

3,351 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 is well tolerated and has substantial activity in the blast crises of CML and in Ph-positive ALL.
Abstract: Background BCR-ABL, a constitutively activated tyrosine kinase, is the product of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. This enzyme is present in virtually all cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) throughout the course of the disease, and in 20 percent of cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). On the basis of the substantial activity of the inhibitor in patients in the chronic phase, we evaluated STI571 (formerly known as CGP 57148B), a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, in patients who had CML in blast crisis and in patients with Ph-chromosome–positive ALL. Methods In this dose-escalating pilot study, 58 patients were treated with STI571; 38 patients had myeloid blast crisis and 20 had ALL or lymphoid blast crisis. Treatment was given orally at daily doses ranging from 300 to 1000 mg. Results Responses occurred in 21 of 38 patients (55 percent) with a myeloid-blast-crisis phenotype; 4 of these 21 patients had a complete hematologic response. Of 20 patients with lymphoid blast crisis ...

2,724 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data, available through 2015, were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data, available through 2016, were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, 1,762,450 new cancer cases and 606,880 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Over the past decade of data, the cancer incidence rate (2006-2015) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% per year in men, whereas the cancer death rate (2007-2016) declined annually by 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the racial gap in cancer mortality is slowly narrowing, socioeconomic inequalities are widening, with the most notable gaps for the most preventable cancers. For example, compared with the most affluent counties, mortality rates in the poorest counties were 2-fold higher for cervical cancer and 40% higher for male lung and liver cancers during 2012-2016. Some states are home to both the wealthiest and the poorest counties, suggesting the opportunity for more equitable dissemination of effective cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment strategies. A broader application of existing cancer control knowledge with an emphasis on disadvantaged groups would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer.

16,028 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Slow momentum for some cancers amenable to early detection is juxtaposed with notable gains for other common cancers, and it is notable that long‐term rapid increases in liver cancer mortality have attenuated in women and stabilized in men.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2016) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2017) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2020, 1,806,590 new cancer cases and 606,520 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. The cancer death rate rose until 1991, then fell continuously through 2017, resulting in an overall decline of 29% that translates into an estimated 2.9 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. This progress is driven by long-term declines in death rates for the 4 leading cancers (lung, colorectal, breast, prostate); however, over the past decade (2008-2017), reductions slowed for female breast and colorectal cancers, and halted for prostate cancer. In contrast, declines accelerated for lung cancer, from 3% annually during 2008 through 2013 to 5% during 2013 through 2017 in men and from 2% to almost 4% in women, spurring the largest ever single-year drop in overall cancer mortality of 2.2% from 2016 to 2017. Yet lung cancer still caused more deaths in 2017 than breast, prostate, colorectal, and brain cancers combined. Recent mortality declines were also dramatic for melanoma of the skin in the wake of US Food and Drug Administration approval of new therapies for metastatic disease, escalating to 7% annually during 2013 through 2017 from 1% during 2006 through 2010 in men and women aged 50 to 64 years and from 2% to 3% in those aged 20 to 49 years; annual declines of 5% to 6% in individuals aged 65 years and older are particularly striking because rates in this age group were increasing prior to 2013. It is also notable that long-term rapid increases in liver cancer mortality have attenuated in women and stabilized in men. In summary, slowing momentum for some cancers amenable to early detection is juxtaposed with notable gains for other common cancers.

15,080 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The combined cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2015 by a total of 26%, translating to approximately 2,378,600 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data, available through 2014, were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data, available through 2015, were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2018, 1,735,350 new cancer cases and 609,640 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Over the past decade of data, the cancer incidence rate (2005-2014) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% annually in men, while the cancer death rate (2006-2015) declined by about 1.5% annually in both men and women. The combined cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2015 by a total of 26%, translating to approximately 2,378,600 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Of the 10 leading causes of death, only cancer declined from 2014 to 2015. In 2015, the cancer death rate was 14% higher in non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) than non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) overall (death rate ratio [DRR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.13-1.15), but the racial disparity was much larger for individuals aged <65 years (DRR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.29-1.32) compared with those aged ≥65 years (DRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.09) and varied substantially by state. For example, the cancer death rate was lower in NHBs than NHWs in Massachusetts for all ages and in New York for individuals aged ≥65 years, whereas for those aged <65 years, it was 3 times higher in NHBs in the District of Columbia (DRR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.16-3.91) and about 50% higher in Wisconsin (DRR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.56-2.02), Kansas (DRR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.25-1.81), Louisiana (DRR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.38-1.60), Illinois (DRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.39-1.57), and California (DRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.38-1.54). Larger racial inequalities in young and middle-aged adults probably partly reflect less access to high-quality health care. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

14,011 citations

Book
29 Sep 2017
TL;DR: Thank you very much for reading who classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, and maybe you have knowledge that, people have look hundreds of times for their chosen readings like this, but end up in malicious downloads.
Abstract: WHO CLASSIFICATION OF TUMOURS OF HAEMATOPOIETIC AND LYMPHOID TISSUES , WHO CLASSIFICATION OF TUMOURS OF HAEMATOPOIETIC AND LYMPHOID TISSUES , کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران

13,835 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2017, 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. For all sites combined, the cancer incidence rate is 20% higher in men than in women, while the cancer death rate is 40% higher. However, sex disparities vary by cancer type. For example, thyroid cancer incidence rates are 3-fold higher in women than in men (21 vs 7 per 100,000 population), despite equivalent death rates (0.5 per 100,000 population), largely reflecting sex differences in the "epidemic of diagnosis." Over the past decade of available data, the overall cancer incidence rate (2004-2013) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% annually in men, while the cancer death rate (2005-2014) declined by about 1.5% annually in both men and women. From 1991 to 2014, the overall cancer death rate dropped 25%, translating to approximately 2,143,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the cancer death rate was 15% higher in blacks than in whites in 2014, increasing access to care as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may expedite the narrowing racial gap; from 2010 to 2015, the proportion of blacks who were uninsured halved, from 21% to 11%, as it did for Hispanics (31% to 16%). Gains in coverage for traditionally underserved Americans will facilitate the broader application of existing cancer control knowledge across every segment of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

13,427 citations