Haijun Jiao

Bio: Haijun Jiao is an academic researcher from University of Rostock. The author has contributed to research in topics: Catalysis & Aromaticity. The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 208 publications receiving 13125 citations. Previous affiliations of Haijun Jiao include University of Arizona & University of Rennes.

Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts: A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

Abstract: The ability to sustain a diatropic ring current is the defining characteristic of aromatic species.1-7 Cyclic electron delocalization results in enhanced stability, bond length equalization, and special magnetic as well as chemical and physical properties.1 In contrast, antiaromatic compounds sustain paratropic ring currents3 despite their localized, destabilized structures.1-7 We have demonstrated the direct, quantitative relationships among energetic, geometrical, and magnetic criteria of aromaticity in a wide-ranging set of aromatic/antiaromatic fivemembered rings.5a While the diamagnetic susceptibility exaltation (Λ) is uniquely associated with aromaticity, it is highly dependent on the ring size (area2) and requires suitable calibration standards.6 Aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs) of strained and more complicated systems are difficult to evaluate. CC bond length variations in polybenzenoid hydrocarbons can be just as large as those in linear conjugated polyenes.2 The abnormal proton chemical shifts of aromatic molecules are the most commonly employed indicators of ring current effects.1 However, the ca. 2-4 ppm displacements of external protons to lower magnetic fields are relatively modest (e.g., δH ) 7.3 for benzene vs 5.6 for dC-H in cyclohexene). In contrast, the upfield chemical shifts of protons located inside aromatic rings are more unusual. The six inner hydrogens of [18]annulene, for example, resonate at -3.0 ppm vs δ ) 9.28 for the outer protons. This relationship is inverted dramatically in the antiaromatic [18]annulene dianion, C18H18, where δ ) 20.8 and 29.5 (in) vs. -1.1 (out).8 Similar demonstrations of paratropic ring currents in antiaromatic compounds are well documented.3,8,9 Chemical shifts of encapsulated 3He atoms are now employed as experimental and computed measures of aromaticity in fullerenes and fullerene derivatives.10 While the rings of most aromatic systems are too small to accommodate atoms internally, the chemical shifts of hydrogens in bridging positions have long been used as aromaticity and antiaromaticity probes.9 δLi+ can be employed similarly, with the advantage that Li+ complexes with individual rings in polycyclic systems can be computed.4,11 We now propose the use of absolute magnetic shieldings, computed at ring centers (nonweighted mean of the heavy atom coordinates) with available quantum mechanics programs,12 as a new aromaticity/antiaromaticity criterion. To correspond to the familiar NMR chemical shift convention, the signs of the computed values are reversed: Negative “nucleus-independent chemical shifts” (NICSs) denote aromaticity; positive NICSs, antiaromaticity (see Table 1 for selected results). Figure 1, a plot of NICSs vs the ASEs for our set of five-membered ring heterocycles,5a provides calibration. The equally good correlations with magnetic susceptibility exaltations and with structural variations establish NICS as an effective aromaticity criterion. Unlike Λ,6 NICS values for [n]annulenes (Table 1) show only a modest dependence on ring size. The 10 π electron systems give significantly higher values than those with 6 π electrons. The antiaromatic 4n π electron compounds, cyclobutadiene (27.6), pentalene (18.1), heptalene (22.7), and planar D4h cyclooctatetraene (30.1), all show highly positive NICSs. Like the Li+-complex probe,4 the NICS evaluates the aromaticity and antiaromaticity contributions of individual rings in polycyclic systems. Scheme 1 (HF/6-31+G*, data from Table 1) shows NICSs for selected examples. The benzenoid aromatic NICSs provide evidence both for localized and “perimeter” models. The naphthalene (1) NICS (-9.9) resembles that of benzene (-9.7), as do the NICSs for the outer rings of phenanthrene (2) (-10.2) and triphenylene (3); the aromaticity of the central rings of the latter two are reduced. The NICS of the central ring of anthracene (4) (-13.3) exceeds the benzene value in contrast to the outer ring NICS (-8.2). Remarkably, the NICS (-7.0) for the seven-membered ring of azulene (5) is very close to that of the tropylium ion (-7.6 ppm), whereas the azulene five-membered ring NICS (-19.7) is even larger in magnitude than that of the cyclopentadienyl anion (-14.3). The four-membered rings in benzocyclobutadiene (6) (NICS ) 22.5) and in biphenylene (7) (19.0) are antiaromatic, but less so than cyclobutadiene itself (27.6). The six-membered rings in these polycycles are still aromatic, but their NICSs (-2.5 (1) (a) Minkin, V. I.; Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Simkin, B. Y. Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1994. (b) Garratt, P. J. Aromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1986. (c) Eluidge, J. A.; Jackman, L. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 859. (2) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Jiao, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 28, 209. (3) Pople, J. A.; Untch, K. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4811. (4) Jiao, H; Schleyer, P. v. R. AIP Conference Proceedings 330, E.C.C.C.1, Computational Chemistry; Bernardi, F., Rivail, J.-L., Eds.; American Institute of Physics: Woodbury, New York, 1995; p 107. (5) (a) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Freeman, P.; Jiao, H.; Goldfuss, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 337. (b) Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Unpublished IGLO results. (c) Kutzelnigg, W.; Fleischer, U.; Schindler, M. In NMR: Basic Princ. Prog.; Springer: Berlin, 1990; Vol. 23, p 165. (6) Dauben, H. J., Jr.; Wilson, J. D.; Laity, J. L. In Non-Benzenoid Aromatics; Synder, J., Ed.; Academic Press, 1971; Vol. 2, and references cited. The partitioning of ring current or ring current susceptabilitites among various rings in polycyclic syestems were considered earlier, e.g., by Aihara (Aihara, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 207, 298 and refs cited) and by Mallion (Haigh, C. W.; Mallion, J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 1982). (7) Fleischer, U.; Kutzelnigg, W.; Lazzeretti, P.; Mühlenkamp, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5298. (8) Sondheimer, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 81. (9) (a) Hunandi, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6889. (b) Pascal, R. A., Jr.; Winans, C. G.; Van Engen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3007. (10) (a) Bühl, M.; Thiel, W.; Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Saunders, M.; Anet, F. A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7429 and references cited. (b) Bühl, M.; van Wüllen, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 247, 63. The authors have shown that the negative absolute shielding in the center of C60 is nearly the same as δ3He, computed at the same level. (11) Paquette, L. A.; Bauer, W.; Sivik, M. R.; Bühl, M.; Feigel, M.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8776. (12) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T. A.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 94, ReVision B.2; Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995. Figure 1. Plot of NICSs (ppm) vs the aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs, kcal/mol)5a for a set of five-membered ring heterocycles, C4H4X (X ) as shown) (cc ) 0.966). 6317 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317

Mild and selective hydrogenation of aromatic and aliphatic (di)nitriles with a well-defined iron pincer complex.

Abstract: The catalytic hydrogenation of carboxylic acid derivatives represents an atom-efficient and clean reduction methodology in organic chemistry. More specifically, the selective hydrogenation of nitriles offers the possibility for a green synthesis of valuable primary amines. So far, this transformation lacks of useful, broadly applicable non-noble metal-based catalyst systems. In the present study, we describe a molecular-defined iron complex, which allows for the hydrogenation of aryl, alkyl, heterocyclic nitriles and dinitriles. By using an iron PNP pincer complex, we achieve very good functional group tolerance. Ester, ether, acetamido as well as amino substituents are not reduced in the presence of nitriles. Moreover, nitriles including an α,β-unsaturated double bond and halogenated derivatives are well tolerated in this reaction. Notably, our complex constitutes the first example of an homogeneous catalyst, which permits the selective hydrogenation of industrially important adipodinitrile to 1,6-hexamethylenediamine.

Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts: A Simple and Efficient Aromaticity Probe

Abstract: The ability to sustain a diatropic ring current is the defining characteristic of aromatic species.1-7 Cyclic electron delocalization results in enhanced stability, bond length equalization, and special magnetic as well as chemical and physical properties.1 In contrast, antiaromatic compounds sustain paratropic ring currents3 despite their localized, destabilized structures.1-7 We have demonstrated the direct, quantitative relationships among energetic, geometrical, and magnetic criteria of aromaticity in a wide-ranging set of aromatic/antiaromatic fivemembered rings.5a While the diamagnetic susceptibility exaltation (Λ) is uniquely associated with aromaticity, it is highly dependent on the ring size (area2) and requires suitable calibration standards.6 Aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs) of strained and more complicated systems are difficult to evaluate. CC bond length variations in polybenzenoid hydrocarbons can be just as large as those in linear conjugated polyenes.2 The abnormal proton chemical shifts of aromatic molecules are the most commonly employed indicators of ring current effects.1 However, the ca. 2-4 ppm displacements of external protons to lower magnetic fields are relatively modest (e.g., δH ) 7.3 for benzene vs 5.6 for dC-H in cyclohexene). In contrast, the upfield chemical shifts of protons located inside aromatic rings are more unusual. The six inner hydrogens of [18]annulene, for example, resonate at -3.0 ppm vs δ ) 9.28 for the outer protons. This relationship is inverted dramatically in the antiaromatic [18]annulene dianion, C18H18, where δ ) 20.8 and 29.5 (in) vs. -1.1 (out).8 Similar demonstrations of paratropic ring currents in antiaromatic compounds are well documented.3,8,9 Chemical shifts of encapsulated 3He atoms are now employed as experimental and computed measures of aromaticity in fullerenes and fullerene derivatives.10 While the rings of most aromatic systems are too small to accommodate atoms internally, the chemical shifts of hydrogens in bridging positions have long been used as aromaticity and antiaromaticity probes.9 δLi+ can be employed similarly, with the advantage that Li+ complexes with individual rings in polycyclic systems can be computed.4,11 We now propose the use of absolute magnetic shieldings, computed at ring centers (nonweighted mean of the heavy atom coordinates) with available quantum mechanics programs,12 as a new aromaticity/antiaromaticity criterion. To correspond to the familiar NMR chemical shift convention, the signs of the computed values are reversed: Negative “nucleus-independent chemical shifts” (NICSs) denote aromaticity; positive NICSs, antiaromaticity (see Table 1 for selected results). Figure 1, a plot of NICSs vs the ASEs for our set of five-membered ring heterocycles,5a provides calibration. The equally good correlations with magnetic susceptibility exaltations and with structural variations establish NICS as an effective aromaticity criterion. Unlike Λ,6 NICS values for [n]annulenes (Table 1) show only a modest dependence on ring size. The 10 π electron systems give significantly higher values than those with 6 π electrons. The antiaromatic 4n π electron compounds, cyclobutadiene (27.6), pentalene (18.1), heptalene (22.7), and planar D4h cyclooctatetraene (30.1), all show highly positive NICSs. Like the Li+-complex probe,4 the NICS evaluates the aromaticity and antiaromaticity contributions of individual rings in polycyclic systems. Scheme 1 (HF/6-31+G*, data from Table 1) shows NICSs for selected examples. The benzenoid aromatic NICSs provide evidence both for localized and “perimeter” models. The naphthalene (1) NICS (-9.9) resembles that of benzene (-9.7), as do the NICSs for the outer rings of phenanthrene (2) (-10.2) and triphenylene (3); the aromaticity of the central rings of the latter two are reduced. The NICS of the central ring of anthracene (4) (-13.3) exceeds the benzene value in contrast to the outer ring NICS (-8.2). Remarkably, the NICS (-7.0) for the seven-membered ring of azulene (5) is very close to that of the tropylium ion (-7.6 ppm), whereas the azulene five-membered ring NICS (-19.7) is even larger in magnitude than that of the cyclopentadienyl anion (-14.3). The four-membered rings in benzocyclobutadiene (6) (NICS ) 22.5) and in biphenylene (7) (19.0) are antiaromatic, but less so than cyclobutadiene itself (27.6). The six-membered rings in these polycycles are still aromatic, but their NICSs (-2.5 (1) (a) Minkin, V. I.; Glukhovtsev, M. N.; Simkin, B. Y. Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1994. (b) Garratt, P. J. Aromaticity; Wiley: New York, 1986. (c) Eluidge, J. A.; Jackman, L. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 859. (2) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Jiao, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 28, 209. (3) Pople, J. A.; Untch, K. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 4811. (4) Jiao, H; Schleyer, P. v. R. AIP Conference Proceedings 330, E.C.C.C.1, Computational Chemistry; Bernardi, F., Rivail, J.-L., Eds.; American Institute of Physics: Woodbury, New York, 1995; p 107. (5) (a) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Freeman, P.; Jiao, H.; Goldfuss, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 337. (b) Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Unpublished IGLO results. (c) Kutzelnigg, W.; Fleischer, U.; Schindler, M. In NMR: Basic Princ. Prog.; Springer: Berlin, 1990; Vol. 23, p 165. (6) Dauben, H. J., Jr.; Wilson, J. D.; Laity, J. L. In Non-Benzenoid Aromatics; Synder, J., Ed.; Academic Press, 1971; Vol. 2, and references cited. The partitioning of ring current or ring current susceptabilitites among various rings in polycyclic syestems were considered earlier, e.g., by Aihara (Aihara, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 207, 298 and refs cited) and by Mallion (Haigh, C. W.; Mallion, J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 1982). (7) Fleischer, U.; Kutzelnigg, W.; Lazzeretti, P.; Mühlenkamp, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5298. (8) Sondheimer, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 81. (9) (a) Hunandi, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6889. (b) Pascal, R. A., Jr.; Winans, C. G.; Van Engen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3007. (10) (a) Bühl, M.; Thiel, W.; Jiao, H.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Saunders, M.; Anet, F. A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7429 and references cited. (b) Bühl, M.; van Wüllen, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 247, 63. The authors have shown that the negative absolute shielding in the center of C60 is nearly the same as δ3He, computed at the same level. (11) Paquette, L. A.; Bauer, W.; Sivik, M. R.; Bühl, M.; Feigel, M.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8776. (12) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T. A.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 94, ReVision B.2; Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995. Figure 1. Plot of NICSs (ppm) vs the aromatic stabilization energies (ASEs, kcal/mol)5a for a set of five-membered ring heterocycles, C4H4X (X ) as shown) (cc ) 0.966). 6317 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317

Conceptual density functional theory.

Abstract: I. Introduction: Conceptual vs Fundamental andComputational Aspects of DFT1793II. Fundamental and Computational Aspects of DFT 1795A. The Basics of DFT: The Hohenberg−KohnTheorems1795B. DFT as a Tool for Calculating Atomic andMolecular Properties: The Kohn−ShamEquations1796C. Electronic Chemical Potential andElectronegativity: Bridging Computational andConceptual DFT1797III. DFT-Based Concepts and Principles 1798A. General Scheme: Nalewajski’s ChargeSensitivity Analysis1798B. Concepts and Their Calculation 18001. Electronegativity and the ElectronicChemical Potential18002. Global Hardness and Softness 18023. The Electronic Fukui Function, LocalSoftness, and Softness Kernel18074. Local Hardness and Hardness Kernel 18135. The Molecular Shape FunctionsSimilarity 18146. The Nuclear Fukui Function and ItsDerivatives18167. Spin-Polarized Generalizations 18198. Solvent Effects 18209. Time Evolution of Reactivity Indices 1821C. Principles 18221. Sanderson’s Electronegativity EqualizationPrinciple18222. Pearson’s Hard and Soft Acids andBases Principle18253. The Maximum Hardness Principle 1829IV. Applications 1833A. Atoms and Functional Groups 1833B. Molecular Properties 18381. Dipole Moment, Hardness, Softness, andRelated Properties18382. Conformation 18403. Aromaticity 1840C. Reactivity 18421. Introduction 18422. Comparison of Intramolecular ReactivitySequences18443. Comparison of Intermolecular ReactivitySequences18494. Excited States 1857D. Clusters and Catalysis 1858V. Conclusions 1860VI. Glossary of Most Important Symbols andAcronyms1860VII. Acknowledgments 1861VIII. Note Added in Proof 1862IX. References 1865

New Chiral Phosphorus Ligands for Enantioselective Hydrogenation

Abstract: The increasing demand to produce enantiomerically pure pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, flavors, and other fine chemicals has advanced the field of asymmetric catalytic technologies.1,2 Among all asymmetric catalytic methods, asymmetric hydrogenation utilizing molecular hydrogen to reduce prochiral olefins, ketones, and imines, have become one of the most efficient methods for constructing chiral compounds.3 The development of homogeneous asymmetric hydrogenation was initiated by Knowles4a and Horner4b in the late 1960s, after the discovery of Wilkinson’s homogeneous hydrogenation catalyst [RhCl(PPh3)3]. By replacing triphenylphosphine of the Wilkinson’s catalystwithresolvedchiralmonophosphines,6Knowles and Horner reported the earliest examples of enantioselective hydrogenation, albeit with poor enantioselectivity. Further exploration by Knowles with an improved monophosphine CAMP provided 88% ee in hydrogenation of dehydroamino acids.7 Later, two breakthroughs were made in asymmetric hydrogenation by Kagan and Knowles, respectively. Kagan reported the first bisphosphine ligand, DIOP, for Rhcatalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation.8 The successful application of DIOP resulted in several significant directions for ligand design in asymmetric hydrogenation. Chelating bisphosphorus ligands could lead to superior enantioselectivity compared to monodentate phosphines. Additionally, P-chiral phosphorus ligands were not necessary for achieving high enantioselectivity, and ligands with backbone chirality could also provide excellent ee’s in asymmetric hydrogenation. Furthermore, C2 symmetry was an important structural feature for developing new efficient chiral ligands. Kagan’s seminal work immediately led to the rapid development of chiral bisphosphorus ligands. Knowles made his significant discovery of a C2-symmetric chelating bisphosphine ligand, DIPAMP.9 Due to its high catalytic efficiency in Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of dehydroamino acids, DIPAMP was quickly employed in the industrial production of L-DOPA.10 The success of practical synthesis of L-DOPA via asymmetric hydrogenation constituted a milestone work and for this work Knowles was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2001.3k This work has enlightened chemists to realize * Corresponding author. 3029 Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3029−3069