Hamisu Sadi Ali

TL;DR: The coefficients of long-run result reveal that urbanization does not have any significant impact on CO2 emissions in Nigeria, economic growth, energy consumption, and energy consumption has a positive and significant impact, however, trade openness has negative andsignificant impact onCO2 emissions.

TL;DR: A political instrument for viable development is introduced here with the goal of balancing the concept of economic development, environmental degradation, and social fairness as well as investigating the impact of institutional quality on environmental quality in the developing countries.

TL;DR: The main finding reveals a negative and significant impact of urbanization on carbon emissions in Singapore, which means that urban development in Singapore is not a barrier to the improvement of environmental quality, which suggests that economic growth reduces environmental quality through its direct effect of increasingcarbon emissions in the country.

TL;DR: Though urbanization is a good predictor of Nigeria's economic growth, however, the adjustment of the energy portfolio to meet the growing urban demand will curtail the adverse and far-reaching impact of urbanization on the economy.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the dynamic impact of financial development, energy consumption, trade openness, and economic growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Nigeria and applied autoregressive distributed lag bound testing technique for the period of 1971-2010.