Hammou El Barmi

Bio: Hammou El Barmi is an academic researcher from City University of New York. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & Stochastic ordering. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 53 publications receiving 448 citations. Previous affiliations of Hammou El Barmi include Baruch College & Kansas State University.

Stochastic processes involving random deletion

Abstract: We consider a system where units having magnitudes arrive according to a nonhomogeneous Poisson process, remain there for a random period and then depart. Eventually, at any point in time only a portion of those units which have entered the system remain. Of interest are the finite time properties and limiting behaviors of the distribution of magnitudes among the units present in the system and among those which have departed from the system. We will derive limiting results for the empirical distribution of magnitudes among the active (departed) units. These results are also shown to extend to systems having stages or steps through which units must proceed. Examples are given to illustrate these results.

Nonparametric estimation of a distribution with type I bias with applications to competing risks

Abstract: A random variable X has a symmetric distribution about a if and only if X − a and −X + a are identically distributed. By considering various types of partial orderings between the distributions of X − a and −X + a, one obtains various types of partial skewness or one-sided bias. For example, F has Type I bias about a if F¯(a + x) ≥ F((a − x)−) for all x > 0; here F¯ = 1 − F. In this article we assume that a = 0, and propose a nonparametric estimator of a continuous distribution function F under the restriction that it has Type I bias. We derive the weak convergence of the resulting process which is used to test for symmetry against that type of bias. The new estimator is then compared with the nonparametric likelihood estimator (NPMLE), [Fcirc] n , of F in terms of mean squared error. A simulation study seems to indicate that the new estimator outperforms the NPMLE uniformly at all the quantiles of the distributions that we have investigated. It turns out that the results developed here could be used to c...

Convergence of Probability Measures

Abstract: Convergence of Probability Measures. By P. Billingsley. Chichester, Sussex, Wiley, 1968. xii, 253 p. 9 1/4“. 117s.

Convergence of probability measures

Abstract: The author's preface gives an outline: "This book is about weakconvergence methods in metric spaces, with applications sufficient to show their power and utility. The Introduction motivates the definitions and indicates how the theory will yield solutions to problems arising outside it. Chapter 1 sets out the basic general theorems, which are then specialized in Chapter 2 to the space C[0, l ] of continuous functions on the unit interval and in Chapter 3 to the space D [0, 1 ] of functions with discontinuities of the first kind. The results of the first three chapters are used in Chapter 4 to derive a variety of limit theorems for dependent sequences of random variables. " The book develops and expands on Donsker's 1951 and 1952 papers on the invariance principle and empirical distributions. The basic random variables remain real-valued although, of course, measures on C[0, l ] and D[0, l ] are vitally used. Within this framework, there are various possibilities for a different and apparently better treatment of the material. More of the general theory of weak convergence of probabilities on separable metric spaces would be useful. Metrizability of the convergence is not brought up until late in the Appendix. The close relation of the Prokhorov metric and a metric for convergence in probability is (hence) not mentioned (see V. Strassen, Ann. Math. Statist. 36 (1965), 423-439; the reviewer, ibid. 39 (1968), 1563-1572). This relation would illuminate and organize such results as Theorems 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4 which give isolated, ad hoc connections between weak convergence of measures and nearness in probability. In the middle of p. 16, it should be noted that C*(S) consists of signed measures which need only be finitely additive if 5 is not compact. On p. 239, where the author twice speaks of separable subsets having nonmeasurable cardinal, he means "discrete" rather than "separable." Theorem 1.4 is Ulam's theorem that a Borel probability on a complete separable metric space is tight. Theorem 1 of Appendix 3 weakens completeness to topological completeness. After mentioning that probabilities on the rationals are tight, the author says it is an

A tutorial on geometric programming

Abstract: A geometric program (GP) is a type of mathematical optimization problem characterized by objective and constraint functions that have a special form. Recently developed solution methods can solve even large-scale GPs extremely efficiently and reliably; at the same time a number of practical problems, particularly in circuit design, have been found to be equivalent to (or well approximated by) GPs. Putting these two together, we get effective solutions for the practical problems. The basic approach in GP modeling is to attempt to express a practical problem, such as an engineering analysis or design problem, in GP format. In the best case, this formulation is exact; when this is not possible, we settle for an approximate formulation. This tutorial paper collects together in one place the basic background material needed to do GP modeling. We start with the basic definitions and facts, and some methods used to transform problems into GP format. We show how to recognize functions and problems compatible with GP, and how to approximate functions or data in a form compatible with GP (when this is possible). We give some simple and representative examples, and also describe some common extensions of GP, along with methods for solving (or approximately solving) them.