Author
Hans Gelderblom
Other affiliations: Leiden University, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Université catholique de Louvain ...read more
Bio: Hans Gelderblom is an academic researcher from Leiden University Medical Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & GiST. The author has an hindex of 81, co-authored 591 publications receiving 27541 citations. Previous affiliations of Hans Gelderblom include Leiden University & Maastricht University Medical Centre.
Topics: Medicine, GiST, Sunitinib, Sarcoma, Soft tissue sarcoma
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Radboud University Nijmegen1, Seoul National University Hospital2, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven3, University of Turin4, University of Pennsylvania5, Institut Gustave Roussy6, Leiden University Medical Center7, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust8, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer9, GlaxoSmithKline10, Harvard University11, Brigham and Women's Hospital12
TL;DR: This phase 3 study investigated the effect of pazopanib on progression-free survival in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy.
1,671 citations
••
TL;DR: With the present development of various new anticancer agents, it is recommended that alternative formulation approaches should be pursued to allow a better control of the toxicity of the treatment and the pharmacological interactions related to the use of CrEL.
1,546 citations
••
University of Milan1, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil2, Curie Institute3, Leiden University Medical Center4, Vienna General Hospital5, University College London6, Leiden University7, Institut Jules Bordet8, Netherlands Cancer Institute9, Turku University Hospital10, University of Oxford11, University of Mannheim12, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich13, Helsinki University Central Hospital14, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust15, Institute of Cancer Research16, University Medical Center Groningen17, Radboud University Nijmegen18, Institut Gustave Roussy19, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center20, University Hospital of Lausanne21, University of Bologna22, University of Turin23, Weston Park Hospital24, Aarhus University Hospital25, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven26, Erasmus University Rotterdam27, Oslo University Hospital28, University College Hospital29, Claude Bernard University Lyon 130
1,150 citations
••
Harvard University1, University of Ulsan2, Claude Bernard University Lyon 13, Leiden University Medical Center4, University of Mannheim5, Fox Chase Cancer Center6, Helsinki University Central Hospital7, University of Palermo8, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto9, Institut Gustave Roussy10, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven11, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai12, University of Duisburg-Essen13, Academy of Military Medical Sciences14, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals15
TL;DR: The results of this study show that oral regorafenib can provide a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with metastatic GIST after progression on standard treatments.
1,079 citations
••
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust1, Erasmus University Rotterdam2, Leiden University Medical Center3, University of Kiel4, University of Tübingen5, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven6, Netherlands Cancer Institute7, University College Hospital8, University of Mannheim9, University of Copenhagen10, McGill University11, Montreal General Hospital12, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer13, Radboud University Nijmegen14
TL;DR: This phase 3 randomised controlled trial assessed whether dose intensification of doxorubicin with ifosfamide improves survival of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma compared with doxorbicin alone.
Abstract: Summary Background Effective targeted treatment is unavailable for most sarcomas and doxorubicin and ifosfamide—which have been used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma for more than 30 years—still have an important role Whether doxorubicin alone or the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide should be used routinely is still controversial We assessed whether dose intensification of doxorubicin with ifosfamide improves survival of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma compared with doxorubicin alone Methods We did this phase 3 randomised controlled trial (EORTC 62012) at 38 hospitals in ten countries We included patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma, age 18–60 years with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 They were randomly assigned (1:1) by the minimisation method to either doxorubicin (75 mg/m 2 by intravenous bolus on day 1 or 72 h continuous intravenous infusion) or intensified doxorubicin (75 mg/m 2 ; 25 mg/m 2 per day, days 1–3) plus ifosfamide (10 g/m 2 over 4 days with mesna and pegfilgrastim) as first-line treatment Randomisation was stratified by centre, performance status (0 vs 1), age ( vs ≥50 years), presence of liver metastases, and histopathological grade (2 vs 3) Patients were treated every 3 weeks till progression or unacceptable toxic effects for up to six cycles The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population The trial is registered with ClinicalTrialsgov, number NCT00061984 Findings Between April 30, 2003, and May 25, 2010, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin and 227 to receive doxorubicin and ifosfamide Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 31–77) in the doxorubicin only group and 59 months (36–72) in the combination group There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median overall survival 12·8 months [95·5% CI 10·5–14·3] in the doxorubicin group vs 14·3 months [12·5–16·5] in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83 [95·5% CI 0·67–1·03]; stratified log-rank test p=0·076) Median progression-free survival was significantly higher for the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group (7·4 months [95% CI 6·6–8·3]) than for the doxorubicin group (4·6 months [2·9–5·6]; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·60–0·90], stratified log-rank test p=0·003) More patients in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group than in the doxorubicin group had an overall response (60 [26%] of 227 patients vs 31 [14%] of 228; p vs 40 [18%] of 223 patients), neutropenia (93 [42%] vs 83 [37%]), febrile neutropenia (103 (46%) vs 30 [13%]), anaemia (78 [35%] vs 10 [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (75 [33%]) vs one [ Interpretation Our results do not support the use of intensified doxorubicin and ifosfamide for palliation of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma unless the specific goal is tumour shrinkage These findings should help individualise the care of patients with this disease Funding Cancer Research UK, EORTC Charitable Trust, UK NHS, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Amgen
819 citations
Cited by
More filters
•
28,685 citations
••
TL;DR: This report describes the process of radiomics, its challenges, and its potential power to facilitate better clinical decision making, particularly in the care of patients with cancer.
Abstract: In the past decade, the field of medical image analysis has grown exponentially, with an increased number of pattern recognition tools and an increase in data set sizes. These advances have facilitated the development of processes for high-throughput extraction of quantitative features that result in the conversion of images into mineable data and the subsequent analysis of these data for decision support; this practice is termed radiomics. This is in contrast to the traditional practice of treating medical images as pictures intended solely for visual interpretation. Radiomic data contain first-, second-, and higher-order statistics. These data are combined with other patient data and are mined with sophisticated bioinformatics tools to develop models that may potentially improve diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy. Because radiomics analyses are intended to be conducted with standard of care images, it is conceivable that conversion of digital images to mineable data will eventually become routine practice. This report describes the process of radiomics, its challenges, and its potential power to facilitate better clinical decision making, particularly in the care of patients with cancer.
4,773 citations
••
TL;DR: Treatment of metastatic melanoma with PLX4032 in patients with tumors that carry the V600E BRAF mutation resulted in complete or partial tumor regression in the majority of patients.
Abstract: Methods We conducted a multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation trial of PLX4032 (also known as RG7204), an orally available inhibitor of mutated BRAF, followed by an extension phase involving the maximum dose that could be administered without adverse effects (the recommended phase 2 dose). Patients received PLX4032 twice daily until they had disease progression. Pharmacokinetic analysis and tumor-response assessments were conducted in all patients. In selected patients, tumor biopsy was performed before and during treatment to validate BRAF inhibition. Results A total of 55 patients (49 of whom had melanoma) were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase, and 32 additional patients with metastatic melanoma who had BRAF with the V600E mutation were enrolled in the extension phase. The recommended phase 2 dose was 960 mg twice daily, with increases in the dose limited by grade 2 or 3 rash, fatigue, and arthralgia. In the dose-escalation cohort, among the 16 patients with melanoma whose tumors carried the V600E BRAF mutation and who were receiving 240 mg or more of PLX4032 twice daily, 10 had a partial response and 1 had a complete response. Among the 32 patients in the extension cohort, 24 had a partial response and 2 had a complete response. The estimated median progression-free survival among all patients was more than 7 months. Conclusions Treatment of metastatic melanoma with PLX4032 in patients with tumors that carry the V600E BRAF mutation resulted in complete or partial tumor regression in the majority of patients. (Funded by Plexxikon and Roche Pharmaceuticals.)
3,399 citations