scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Harold G. Freund

Bio: Harold G. Freund is an academic researcher from Roswell Park Cancer Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Electron paramagnetic resonance & Hyperfine structure. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 53 publications receiving 1122 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The evidence suggests that tandem base damage is a significant component of free radical-induced DNA damage.

87 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence is presented for the formation of products in irradiated dinucleoside monophosphates in which both bases are damaged and guanine is converted to 8-hydroxyguanine and the pyrimidine base is degraded to a formamido remnant.
Abstract: Evidence is presented for the formation of products in irradiated dinucleoside monophosphates in which both bases are damaged. The dinucleoside monophosphates d(GpT), d(GpC), d(TpG) and d(CpG) were X-irradiated in oxygenated aqueous solution. Product identification was by NMR spectroscopy. In products containing double base lesions, guanine is converted to 8-hydroxyguanine and the pyrimidine base is degraded to a formamido remnant.

70 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The principal paramagnetic species observed at low temperature has an unpaired electron in a 2pπ orbital on the carbon atom of the carboxyl group.
Abstract: Electron spin resonance absorption was observed in single crystals of (–CH2–COOH)2, (–CH2–;COOD)2, and (–CH2–13COOH)2 irradiated at 77°K. The principal paramagnetic species observed at low temperature has an unpaired electron in a 2pπ orbital on the carbon atom of the carboxyl group. It is probably ionized succinic acid with the oxygen of the carboxyl group carrying a negative charge.

59 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: ROS and RNS could contribute to the initiation of cancer, in addition to being important in the promotion and progression phases, as evidence is growing that antioxidants may prevent or delay the onset of some types of cancer.
Abstract: It is increasingly proposed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) play a key role in human cancer development [1–6], especially as evidence is growing that antioxidants may prevent or delay the onset of some types of cancer (reviewed in [7,8]). ROS is a collective term often used by biologists to include oxygen radicals [superoxide (O # J−), hydroxyl (OHJ), peroxyl (RO # J) and alkoxyl (ROJ)] and certain nonradicals that are either oxidizing agents and}or are easily converted into radicals, such as HOCl, ozone (O $ ), peroxynitrite (ONOO−), singlet oxygen ("O # ) and H # O # . RNS is a similar collective term that includes nitric oxide radical (NOJ), ONOO−, nitrogen dioxide radical (NO # J), other oxides of nitrogen and products arising when NOJ reacts with O # J−, ROJ and RO # J. ‘Reactive ’ is not always an appropriate term; H # O # , NOJ and O # J− react quickly with very few molecules, whereas OHJ reacts quickly with almost anything. RO # J, ROJ, HOCl, NO # J, ONOO− and O $ have intermediate reactivities. ROS and RNS have been shown to possess many characteristics of carcinogens [4] (Figure 1). Mutagenesis by ROS}RNS could contribute to the initiation of cancer, in addition to being important in the promotion and progression phases. For example, ROS}RNS can have the following effects. (1) Cause structural alterations in DNA, e.g. base pair mutations, rearrangements, deletions, insertions and sequence amplification. OHJ is especially damaging, but "O # , RO # J, ROJ, HNO # , O $ , ONOO− and the decomposition products of ONOO− are also effective [9–13]. ROS can produce gross chromosomal alterations in addition to point mutations and thus could be involved in the inactivation or loss of the second wild-type allele of a mutated proto-oncogene or tumour-suppressor gene that can occur during tumour promotion and progression, allowing expression of the mutated phenotype [4]. (2) Affect cytoplasmic and nuclear signal transduction pathways [14,15]. For example, H # O # (which crosses cell and organelle membranes easily) can lead to displacement of the inhibitory subunit from the cytoplasmic transcription factor nuclear factor κB, allowing the activated factor to migrate to the nucleus [14]. Nitration of tyrosine residues by ONOO− may block phosphorylation. (3) Modulate the activity of the proteins and genes that respond to stress and which act to regulate the genes that are related to cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [4,14–17]. For example, H # O # can stimulate transcription of c-jun

2,321 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Treatment with either peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts and selective superoxide dismutase mimetics, or with SODm, have been shown to prevent in vivo the delayed vascular decompensation and the cellular energetic failure associated with shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury.
Abstract: A vast amount of circumstantial evidence implicates oxygen-derived free radicals (especially superoxide and hydroxyl radical) and high-energy oxidants (such as peroxynitrite) as mediators of inflammation, shock, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. The aim of this review is to describe recent developments in the field of oxidative stress research. The first part of the review focuses on the roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. The second part of the review deals with the novel findings using recently identified pharmacological tools (e.g., peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts and selective superoxide dismutase mimetics (SODm) in shock, ischemia/reperfusion, and inflammation. 1) The role of ROS consists of immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence that demonstrates the production of ROS in shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. ROS can initiate a wide range of toxic oxidative reactions. These include initiation of lipid peroxidation, direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymes, inactivation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, inhibition of membrane sodium/potassium ATPase activity, inactivation of membrane sodium channels, and other oxidative modifications of proteins. All these toxicities are likely to play a role in the pathophysiology of shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion. 2) Treatment with either peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts, which selectively inhibit peroxynitrite, or with SODm, which selectively mimic the catalytic activity of the human superoxide dismutase enzymes, have been shown to prevent in vivo the delayed vascular decompensation and the cellular energetic failure associated with shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. ROS (e.g., superoxide, peroxynitrite, hydroxyl radical, and hydrogen peroxide) are all potential reactants capable of initiating DNA single-strand breakage, with subsequent activation of the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase, leading to eventual severe energy depletion of the cells and necrotic-type cell death. Antioxidant treatment inhibits the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase and prevents the organ injury associated with shock, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion.

1,111 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The main UVB- and UVA-induced DNA photoproducts, together with the mechanisms of their formation, are described and it was found that UVA photooxidation damage mostly involves the guanine residues of cellular DNA as the result of singlet oxygen generation by still unknown endogenous photosensitizers.
Abstract: In this survey, emphasis was placed on the main photoreactions of nucleic acid components, involving both direct and indirect effects. The main UVB- and UVA-induced DNA photoproducts, together with the mechanisms of their formation, are described. Information on the photoproduct distribution within cellular DNA is also provided, taking into account the limitations of the different analytical methods applied to monitor the formation of the DNA damage. Thus, the formation of the main DNA dimeric pyrimidine lesions produced by direct absorption of UVB photons was assessed using a powerful HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry assay. In addition, it was found that UVA photooxidation damage mostly involves the guanine residues of cellular DNA as the result of singlet oxygen generation by still unknown endogenous photosensitizers.

865 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current status of knowledge and evidence on the mechanisms and involvement of intracellular oxidative stress and DNA damage in human malignancy evolution and possible use of these parameters as cancer biomarkers are presented and controversies related to specific methodologies used for the measurement of oxidatively induced DNA lesions in human cells or tissues are discussed.
Abstract: Cells in tissues and organs are continuously subjected to oxidative stress and free radicals on a daily basis. This free radical attack has exogenous or endogenous (intracellular) origin. The cells withstand and counteract this occurrence by the use of several and different defense mechanisms ranging from free radical scavengers like glutathione (GSH), vitamins C and E and antioxidant enzymes like catalase, superoxide dismutase and various peroxidases to sophisticated and elaborate DNA repair mechanisms. The outcome of this dynamic equilibrium is usually the induction of oxidatively induced DNA damage and a variety of lesions of small to high importance and dangerous for the cell i.e. isolated base lesions or single strand breaks (SSBs) to complex lesions like double strand breaks (DSBs) and other non-DSB oxidatively generated clustered DNA lesions (OCDLs). The accumulation of DNA damage through misrepair or incomplete repair may lead to mutagenesis and consequently transformation particularly if combined with a deficient apoptotic pathway. In this review, we present the current status of knowledge and evidence on the mechanisms and involvement of intracellular oxidative stress and DNA damage in human malignancy evolution and possible use of these parameters as cancer biomarkers. At the same time, we discuss controversies related to potential artifacts inherent to specific methodologies used for the measurement of oxidatively induced DNA lesions in human cells or tissues.

820 citations