scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Heather Schmidt

Bio: Heather Schmidt is an academic researcher from Washington University in St. Louis. The author has contributed to research in topics: Genome & Myeloid leukemia. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 49 publications receiving 48226 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
04 Oct 2012-Nature
TL;DR: The ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity.
Abstract: We analysed primary breast cancers by genomic DNA copy number arrays, DNA methylation, exome sequencing, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. Our ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity. Somatic mutations in only three genes (TP53, PIK3CA and GATA3) occurred at >10% incidence across all breast cancers; however, there were numerous subtype-associated and novel gene mutations including the enrichment of specific mutations in GATA3, PIK3CA and MAP3K1 with the luminal A subtype. We identified two novel protein-expression-defined subgroups, possibly produced by stromal/microenvironmental elements, and integrated analyses identified specific signalling pathways dominant in each molecular subtype including a HER2/phosphorylated HER2/EGFR/phosphorylated EGFR signature within the HER2-enriched expression subtype. Comparison of basal-like breast tumours with high-grade serous ovarian tumours showed many molecular commonalities, indicating a related aetiology and similar therapeutic opportunities. The biological finding of the four main breast cancer subtypes caused by different subsets of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities raises the hypothesis that much of the clinically observable plasticity and heterogeneity occurs within, and not across, these major biological subtypes of breast cancer.

9,355 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Oct 2008-Nature
TL;DR: The interim integrative analysis of DNA copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation aberrations in 206 glioblastomas reveals a link between MGMT promoter methylation and a hypermutator phenotype consequent to mismatch repair deficiency in treated gliobeasts, demonstrating that it can rapidly expand knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.
Abstract: Human cancer cells typically harbour multiple chromosomal aberrations, nucleotide substitutions and epigenetic modifications that drive malignant transformation. The Cancer Genome Atlas ( TCGA) pilot project aims to assess the value of large- scale multi- dimensional analysis of these molecular characteristics in human cancer and to provide the data rapidly to the research community. Here we report the interim integrative analysis of DNA copy number, gene expression and DNA methylation aberrations in 206 glioblastomas - the most common type of primary adult brain cancer - and nucleotide sequence aberrations in 91 of the 206 glioblastomas. This analysis provides new insights into the roles of ERBB2, NF1 and TP53, uncovers frequent mutations of the phosphatidylinositol- 3- OH kinase regulatory subunit gene PIK3R1, and provides a network view of the pathways altered in the development of glioblastoma. Furthermore, integration of mutation, DNA methylation and clinical treatment data reveals a link between MGMT promoter methylation and a hypermutator phenotype consequent to mismatch repair deficiency in treated glioblastomas, an observation with potential clinical implications. Together, these findings establish the feasibility and power of TCGA, demonstrating that it can rapidly expand knowledge of the molecular basis of cancer.

6,761 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Pan-Cancer initiative compares the first 12 tumor types profiled by TCGA with a major opportunity to develop an integrated picture of commonalities, differences and emergent themes across tumor lineages.
Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has profiled and analyzed large numbers of human tumors to discover molecular aberrations at the DNA, RNA, protein and epigenetic levels. The resulting rich data provide a major opportunity to develop an integrated picture of commonalities, differences and emergent themes across tumor lineages. The Pan-Cancer initiative compares the first 12 tumor types profiled by TCGA. Analysis of the molecular aberrations and their functional roles across tumor types will teach us how to extend therapies effective in one cancer type to others with a similar genomic profile.

5,294 citations

Journal Article
01 Sep 2013-Nature
TL;DR: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has profiled and analyzed large numbers of human tumors to discover molecular aberrations at the DNA, RNA, protein and epigenetic levels as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has profiled and analyzed large numbers of human tumors to discover molecular aberrations at the DNA, RNA, protein and epigenetic levels. The resulting rich data provide a major opportunity to develop an integrated picture of commonalities, differences and emergent themes across tumor lineages. The Pan-Cancer initiative compares the first 12 tumor types profiled by TCGA. Analysis of the molecular aberrations and their functional roles across tumor types will teach us how to extend therapies effective in one cancer type to others with a similar genomic profile.

4,634 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Timothy J. Ley1, Christopher A. Miller1, Li Ding1, Benjamin J. Raphael2, Andrew J. Mungall3, Gordon Robertson3, Katherine A. Hoadley4, Timothy J. Triche5, Peter W. Laird5, Jack Baty1, Lucinda Fulton1, Robert S. Fulton1, Sharon Heath1, Joelle Kalicki-Veizer1, Cyriac Kandoth1, Jeffery M. Klco1, Daniel C. Koboldt1, Krishna L. Kanchi1, Shashikant Kulkarni1, Tamara Lamprecht1, David E. Larson1, G. Lin1, Charles Lu1, Michael D. McLellan1, Joshua F. McMichael1, Jacqueline E. Payton1, Heather Schmidt1, David H. Spencer1, Michael H. Tomasson1, John W. Wallis1, Lukas D. Wartman1, Mark A. Watson1, John S. Welch1, Michael C. Wendl1, Adrian Ally3, Miruna Balasundaram3, Inanc Birol3, Yaron S.N. Butterfield3, Readman Chiu3, Andy Chu3, Eric Chuah3, Hye Jung E. Chun3, Richard Corbett3, Noreen Dhalla3, Ranabir Guin3, An He3, Carrie Hirst3, Martin Hirst3, Robert A. Holt3, Steven J.M. Jones3, Aly Karsan3, Darlene Lee3, Haiyan I. Li3, Marco A. Marra3, Michael Mayo3, Richard A. Moore3, Karen Mungall3, Jeremy Parker3, Erin Pleasance3, Patrick Plettner3, Jacquie Schein3, Dominik Stoll3, Lucas Swanson3, Angela Tam3, Nina Thiessen3, Richard Varhol3, Natasja Wye3, Yongjun Zhao3, Stacey Gabriel6, Gad Getz6, Carrie Sougnez6, Lihua Zou6, Mark D.M. Leiserson2, Fabio Vandin2, Hsin-Ta Wu2, Frederick Applebaum7, Stephen B. Baylin8, Rehan Akbani9, Bradley M. Broom9, Ken Chen9, Thomas C. Motter9, Khanh Thi-Thuy Nguyen9, John N. Weinstein9, Nianziang Zhang9, Martin L. Ferguson, Christopher Adams10, Aaron D. Black10, Jay Bowen10, Julie M. Gastier-Foster10, Thomas Grossman10, Tara M. Lichtenberg10, Lisa Wise10, Tanja Davidsen11, John A. Demchok11, Kenna R. Mills Shaw11, Margi Sheth11, Heidi J. Sofia, Liming Yang11, James R. Downing, Greg Eley, Shelley Alonso12, Brenda Ayala12, Julien Baboud12, Mark Backus12, Sean P. Barletta12, Dominique L. Berton12, Anna L. Chu12, Stanley Girshik12, Mark A. Jensen12, Ari B. Kahn12, Prachi Kothiyal12, Matthew C. Nicholls12, Todd Pihl12, David Pot12, Rohini Raman12, Rashmi N. Sanbhadti12, Eric E. Snyder12, Deepak Srinivasan12, Jessica Walton12, Yunhu Wan12, Zhining Wang12, Jean Pierre J. Issa13, Michelle M. Le Beau14, Martin Carroll15, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Steven M. Kornblau, Moiz S. Bootwalla5, Phillip H. Lai5, Hui Shen5, David Van Den Berg5, Daniel J. Weisenberger5, Daniel C. Link1, Matthew J. Walter1, Bradley A. Ozenberger11, Elaine R. Mardis1, Peter Westervelt1, Timothy A. Graubert1, John F. DiPersio1, Richard K. Wilson1 
TL;DR: It is found that a complex interplay of genetic events contributes to AML pathogenesis in individual patients and the databases from this study are widely available to serve as a foundation for further investigations of AMl pathogenesis, classification, and risk stratification.
Abstract: BACKGROUND—Many mutations that contribute to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are undefined The relationships between patterns of mutations and epigenetic phenotypes are not yet clear METHODS—We analyzed the genomes of 200 clinically annotated adult cases of de novo AML, using either whole-genome sequencing (50 cases) or whole-exome sequencing (150 cases), along with RNA and microRNA sequencing and DNA-methylation analysis RESULTS—AML genomes have fewer mutations than most other adult cancers, with an average of only 13 mutations found in genes Of these, an average of 5 are in genes that are recurrently mutated in AML A total of 23 genes were significantly mutated, and another 237 were mutated in two or more samples Nearly all samples had at least 1 nonsynonymous mutation in one of nine categories of genes that are almost certainly relevant for pathogenesis, including transcriptionfactor fusions (18% of cases), the gene encoding nucleophosmin (NPM1) (27%), tumorsuppressor genes (16%), DNA-methylation–related genes (44%), signaling genes (59%), chromatin-modifying genes (30%), myeloid transcription-factor genes (22%), cohesin-complex genes (13%), and spliceosome-complex genes (14%) Patterns of cooperation and mutual exclusivity suggested strong biologic relationships among several of the genes and categories CONCLUSIONS—We identified at least one potential driver mutation in nearly all AML samples and found that a complex interplay of genetic events contributes to AML pathogenesis in individual patients The databases from this study are widely available to serve as a foundation for further investigations of AML pathogenesis, classification, and risk stratification (Funded by the National Institutes of Health) The molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been studied with the use of cytogenetic analysis for more than three decades Recurrent chromosomal structural variations are well established as diagnostic and prognostic markers, suggesting that acquired genetic abnormalities (ie, somatic mutations) have an essential role in pathogenesis 1,2 However, nearly 50% of AML samples have a normal karyotype, and many of these genomes lack structural abnormalities, even when assessed with high-density comparative genomic hybridization or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays 3-5 (see Glossary) Targeted sequencing has identified recurrent mutations in FLT3, NPM1, KIT, CEBPA, and TET2 6-8 Massively parallel sequencing enabled the discovery of recurrent mutations in DNMT3A 9,10 and IDH1 11 Recent studies have shown that many patients with

3,980 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal significantly lowers the barriers between complex genomic data and cancer researchers who want rapid, intuitive, and high-quality access to molecular profiles and clinical attributes from large-scale cancer genomics projects and empowers researchers to translate these rich data sets into biologic insights and clinical applications.
Abstract: The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal (http://cbioportal.org) is an open-access resource for interactive exploration of multidimensional cancer genomics data sets, currently providing access to data from more than 5,000 tumor samples from 20 cancer studies. The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal significantly lowers the barriers between complex genomic data and cancer researchers who want rapid, intuitive, and high-quality access to molecular profiles and clinical attributes from large-scale cancer genomics projects and empowers researchers to translate these rich data sets into biologic insights and clinical applications.

11,912 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A practical guide to the analysis and visualization features of the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, which makes complex cancer genomics profiles accessible to researchers and clinicians without requiring bioinformatics expertise, thus facilitating biological discoveries.
Abstract: The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://cbioportal.org) provides a Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimensional cancer genomics data. The portal reduces molecular profiling data from cancer tissues and cell lines into readily understandable genetic, epigenetic, gene expression, and proteomic events. The query interface combined with customized data storage enables researchers to interactively explore genetic alterations across samples, genes, and pathways and, when available in the underlying data, to link these to clinical outcomes. The portal provides graphical summaries of gene-level data from multiple platforms, network visualization and analysis, survival analysis, patient-centric queries, and software programmatic access. The intuitive Web interface of the portal makes complex cancer genomics profiles accessible to researchers and clinicians without requiring bioinformatics expertise, thus facilitating biological discoveries. Here, we provide a practical guide to the analysis and visualization features of the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics.

10,947 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an approach for efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data.
Abstract: Rapid improvements in sequencing and array-based platforms are resulting in a flood of diverse genome-wide data, including data from exome and whole-genome sequencing, epigenetic surveys, expression profiling of coding and noncoding RNAs, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and copy number profiling, and functional assays. Analysis of these large, diverse data sets holds the promise of a more comprehensive understanding of the genome and its relation to human disease. Experienced and knowledgeable human review is an essential component of this process, complementing computational approaches. This calls for efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data. However, the sheer volume and scope of data pose a significant challenge to the development of such tools.

10,798 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the US.
Abstract: The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), is the largest population-based registry focused exclusively on primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the United States (US) and represents the entire US population. This report contains the most up-to-date population-based data on primary brain tumors (malignant and non-malignant) and supersedes all previous CBTRUS reports in terms of completeness and accuracy. All rates (incidence and mortality) are age-adjusted using the 2000 US standard population and presented per 100,000 population. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rate (AAAIR) of all malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors was 23.79 (Malignant AAAIR=7.08, non-Malignant AAAIR=16.71). This rate was higher in females compared to males (26.31 versus 21.09), Blacks compared to Whites (23.88 versus 23.83), and non-Hispanics compared to Hispanics (24.23 versus 21.48). The most commonly occurring malignant brain and other CNS tumor was glioblastoma (14.5% of all tumors), and the most common non-malignant tumor was meningioma (38.3% of all tumors). Glioblastoma was more common in males, and meningioma was more common in females. In children and adolescents (age 0-19 years), the incidence rate of all primary brain and other CNS tumors was 6.14. An estimated 83,830 new cases of malignant and non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors are expected to be diagnosed in the US in 2020 (24,970 malignant and 58,860 non-malignant). There were 81,246 deaths attributed to malignant brain and other CNS tumors between 2013 and 2017. This represents an average annual mortality rate of 4.42. The 5-year relative survival rate following diagnosis of a malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 23.5% and for a non-malignant brain and other CNS tumor was 82.4%.

9,802 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Oct 2012-Nature
TL;DR: The ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity.
Abstract: We analysed primary breast cancers by genomic DNA copy number arrays, DNA methylation, exome sequencing, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. Our ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity. Somatic mutations in only three genes (TP53, PIK3CA and GATA3) occurred at >10% incidence across all breast cancers; however, there were numerous subtype-associated and novel gene mutations including the enrichment of specific mutations in GATA3, PIK3CA and MAP3K1 with the luminal A subtype. We identified two novel protein-expression-defined subgroups, possibly produced by stromal/microenvironmental elements, and integrated analyses identified specific signalling pathways dominant in each molecular subtype including a HER2/phosphorylated HER2/EGFR/phosphorylated EGFR signature within the HER2-enriched expression subtype. Comparison of basal-like breast tumours with high-grade serous ovarian tumours showed many molecular commonalities, indicating a related aetiology and similar therapeutic opportunities. The biological finding of the four main breast cancer subtypes caused by different subsets of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities raises the hypothesis that much of the clinically observable plasticity and heterogeneity occurs within, and not across, these major biological subtypes of breast cancer.

9,355 citations