Author
Heike Schroeder
Other affiliations: University of California, University of Oxford, Environmental Change Institute ...read more
Bio: Heike Schroeder is an academic researcher from University of East Anglia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Corporate governance & Sustainability. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 72 publications receiving 5762 citations. Previous affiliations of Heike Schroeder include University of California & University of Oxford.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce a special issue dedicated to understanding the governance and implementation dimensions of REDD+ at international, national and local levels, and highlight three main pillars for a future research agenda.
445 citations
22 Aug 2008
TL;DR: Biermann et al. as mentioned in this paper presented an overview of recent research on how institutions matter in efforts to tackle such environmental problems as the loss of biological diversity, the degradation of forests, and the overarching issue of climate change.
Abstract: Studies show that institutions play a role both in causing and in addressing problems arising from human-environment interactions. But the nature of this role is complex and not easily described. This book presents an overview of recent research on how institutions matter in efforts to tackle such environmental problems as the loss of biological diversity, the degradation of forests, and the overarching issue of climate change. Using the tools of the "new institutionalism" in the social sciences, the book treats institutions as sets of rights, rules, and decision-making procedures. Individual chapters present research findings and examine policy implications regarding questions of causality, performance, and institutional design as well as the themes of institutional fit (or misfit), interplay, and scale. Institutions and Environmental Change is the product of a decade-long international research project on the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) carried out under the auspices of the International Human Dimensions Programme. The book's policy insights demonstrate that research on institutions can provide the basis for practical advice on effective ways to deal with the most pressing environmental problems of our times. Contributors: Frank Biermann, Carl Folke, Victor Galaz, Thomas Gehring, Joyeeta Gupta, Thomas Hahn, Leslie A. King, Ronald B. Mitchell, Sebastian Oberthur, Per Olsson, Heike Schroeder, Uno Svedin, Simon Tay, Arild Underdal, Oran R. Young
405 citations
Lund University1, VU University Amsterdam2, Arizona State University3, Fridtjof Nansen Institute4, University of Toronto5, Colorado State University6, Durham University7, Yale University8, University of Waterloo9, Stockholm Resilience Centre10, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences11, Wageningen University and Research Centre12, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education13, University of Massachusetts Amherst14, University of East Anglia15, Tokyo Institute of Technology16, United Nations17, Slovak Academy of Sciences18, Chiang Mai University19, University of Arizona20, University of Oxford21, Carleton University22, University of Oregon23, University of Sussex24, Vrije Universiteit Brussel25, University of California, Riverside26, Colef27, University of Oslo28, University of Itaúna29, University of California, Santa Barbara30
TL;DR: The United Nations conference in Rio de Janeiro in June is an important opportunity to improve the institutional framework for sustainable development and requires fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship.
Abstract: Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability typical for the previous 500,000 years ( 1 , 2 ). Human societies must now change course and steer away from critical tipping points in the Earth system that might lead to rapid and irreversible change ( 3 ). This requires fundamental reorientation and restructuring of national and international institutions toward more effective Earth system governance and planetary stewardship.
402 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight the conceptual challenges posed by the increasing involvement of non-nation-state actors in the governance of climate change and explore the potential for drawing from alternative theoretical traditions to address these challenges.
Abstract: The governance of climate change has traditionally been conceived as an issue of international co-operation and considered through the lens of regime analysis. Increasingly, scholars of global governance have highlighted the multiple parallel initiatives involving a range of actors at different levels of governance through which this issue is being addressed. In this paper, we argue that this phenomenon warrants a re-engagement with some of the conceptual cornerstones of international studies. We highlight the conceptual challenges posed by the increasing involvement of non-nation-state actors (NNSAs) in the governance of climate change and explore the potential for drawing from alternative theoretical traditions to address these challenges. Specifically, the paper combines insights from neo-Gramscian and governmentality perspectives as a means of providing the critical space required to generate deeper understanding of: (a) the nature of power in global governance; (b) the relationship between public and...
388 citations
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a set of methods for constructing CO2 emissions inventories for Chinese cities based on energy balance table and examined uncertainties of the inventories, which is the basis for many climate policy and goal research in the future.
314 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: The work of the IPCC Working Group III 5th Assessment report as mentioned in this paper is a comprehensive, objective and policy neutral assessment of the current scientific knowledge on mitigating climate change, which has been extensively reviewed by experts and governments to ensure quality and comprehensiveness.
Abstract: The talk with present the key results of the IPCC Working Group III 5th assessment report. Concluding four years of intense scientific collaboration by hundreds of authors from around the world, the report responds to the request of the world's governments for a comprehensive, objective and policy neutral assessment of the current scientific knowledge on mitigating climate change. The report has been extensively reviewed by experts and governments to ensure quality and comprehensiveness.
3,224 citations
TL;DR: Griggs and colleagues as mentioned in this paper argue that planetary stability must be integrated with United Nations targets to fight poverty and secure human well-being, argue David Griggs and colleagues, and
Abstract: Planetary stability must be integrated with United Nations targets to fight poverty and secure human well-being, argue David Griggs and colleagues.
1,989 citations
Posted Content•
TL;DR: F fuzzy sets allow a far richer dialogue between ideas and evidence in social research than previously possible, and can be carefully tailored to fit evolving theoretical concepts, sharpening quantitative tools with in-depth knowledge gained through qualitative, case-oriented inquiry.
Abstract: In this innovative approach to the practice of social science, Charles Ragin explores the use of fuzzy sets to bridge the divide between quantitative and qualitative methods. Paradoxically, the fuzzy set is a powerful tool because it replaces an unwieldy, "fuzzy" instrument—the variable, which establishes only the positions of cases relative to each other, with a precise one—degree of membership in a well-defined set. Ragin argues that fuzzy sets allow a far richer dialogue between ideas and evidence in social research than previously possible. They let quantitative researchers abandon "homogenizing assumptions" about cases and causes, they extend diversity-oriented research strategies, and they provide a powerful connection between theory and data analysis. Most important, fuzzy sets can be carefully tailored to fit evolving theoretical concepts, sharpening quantitative tools with in-depth knowledge gained through qualitative, case-oriented inquiry. This book will revolutionize research methods not only in sociology, political science, and anthropology but in any field of inquiry dealing with complex patterns of causation.
1,828 citations
Stockholm Resilience Centre1, Stockholm University2, University of Copenhagen3, University of Exeter4, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences5, University of Arizona6, Scott Polar Research Institute7, Stanford University8, Université catholique de Louvain9, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research10, Australian National University11, Wageningen University and Research Centre12, University of Potsdam13
TL;DR: The risk that self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temperature rises and cause continued warming on a “Hothouse Earth” pathway even as human emissions are reduced is explored.
Abstract: We explore the risk that self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temperature rises and cause continued warming on a "Hothouse Earth" pathway even as human emissions are reduced. Crossing the threshold would lead to a much higher global average temperature than any interglacial in the past 1.2 million years and to sea levels significantly higher than at any time in the Holocene. We examine the evidence that such a threshold might exist and where it might be. If the threshold is crossed, the resulting trajectory would likely cause serious disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies. Collective human action is required to steer the Earth System away from a potential threshold and stabilize it in a habitable interglacial-like state. Such action entails stewardship of the entire Earth System-biosphere, climate, and societies-and could include decarbonization of the global economy, enhancement of biosphere carbon sinks, behavioral changes, technological innovations, new governance arrangements, and transformed social values.
1,685 citations