Showing papers by "Henry R. Black published in 1998"

Garlic powder and plasma lipids and lipoproteins a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: Background Garlic powder tablets have been reported to lower serum cholesterol levels. There is widespread belief among the general public that garlic powder tablets aid in controlling cholesterol levels. However, much of the prior data demonstrating the cholesterol-lowering effect of garlic tablets involved studies that were inadequately controlled. Objective To determine the lipid-lowering effect of garlic powder tablets in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week, parallel treatment study carried out in 2 outpatient lipid clinics. Entry into the study after 8 weeks of diet stabilization required a mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level on 2 visits of 4.1 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) or lower and a triglyceride level of 4.0 mmol/L (350 mg/dL) or lower. The active treatment arm received tablets containing 300 mg of garlic powder (Kwai) 3 times per day, given with meals (total, 900 mg/d). This is equivalent to approximately 2.7 g or approximately 1 clove of fresh garlic per day. The placebo arm received an identical-looking tablet, also given 3 times per day with meals. The main outcome measures included levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol after 12 weeks of treatment. Results Twenty-eight patients (43% male; mean ± SD age, 58 ± 14 years) received garlic powder treatment and 22 (68% male; mean ± SD age, 57 ± 13 years) received placebo treatment. There were no significant lipid or lipoprotein changes in either the placebo- or garlic-treated groups and no significant difference between changes in the placebo-treated group compared with changes in the garlic-treated patients. Conclusion Garlic powder (900 mg/d) treatment for 12 weeks was ineffective in lowering cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Comparison of Effects of Controlled Onset Extended Release Verapamil at Bedtime and Nifedipine Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System on Arising on Early Morning Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and the Heart Rate–Blood Pressure Product

Abstract: We assessed the differential effects of a chronotherapeutic agent (controlled-onset extended release [COER] verapamil), administered at bedtime versus a conventional, homeostatic therapy (nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system [GITS]) taken in the morning, on early morning and 24-hour blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and the HR x systolic BP product. The study was a multicenter (n = 51), randomized, double-blind prospective clinical trial with a 10-week treatment period. Dose titration was performed by study investigators based on systolic and diastolic BP values at the doctor's office. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at placebo baseline, after 4 weeks of stable double-blind therapy, and at end of the study. Twenty-four-hour BP profiles were studied in 557 hypertensive patients. Changes in BP, HR, slope of the rate of rise of BP and HR, and the HR-systolic BP product during the 4 hours from 1 hour before to 3 hours after awakening were evaluated. The study was powered to show equivalence between the 2 regimens, predefined as a difference between treatment groups in mean change from baseline in early morning BP of +/- 5 mm Hg systolic and +/- 3 mm Hg diastolic. Changes in the early morning BP fell within the definition of equivalence for the 2 treatment strategies (-12.0/-8.2 mm Hg for COER-verapamil and -13.9/-7.3 mm Hg for nifedipine GITS). Changes in both the early morning HR and rate-pressure product were significantly greater following COER-verapamil therapy versus nifedipine GITS (HR, -3.8 beats/minute vs +2.6 beats/minute, p < 0.001 and HR-systolic BP product, -1,437 beats/min x mm Hg vs -703 beats/min x mm Hg, respectively, p < 0.001). Changes in ambulatory BP demonstrated clinically similar reductions for the awake period, but nifedipine GITS lowered systolic BP to a greater extent than COER-verapamil during sleep (-11.0 vs -5.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001). COER-verapamil and nifedipine GITS had equivalent effects (+/- 5/3 mm Hg) on early morning BP. In addition, both extended-release calcium antagonists effectively lowered 24-hour BP. However, COER-verapamil had greater effects than nifedipine GITS on early morning hemodynamics (HR, HR-systolic BP product, rate of rise of BP and HR) and lesser effects during sleep due to its intrinsic pharmacologic properties and chronotherapeutic delivery system.