scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Hollianne Bruce

Bio: Hollianne Bruce is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Contact tracing & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 4 publications receiving 4239 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This case highlights the importance of close coordination between clinicians and public health authorities at the local, state, and federal levels, as well as the need for rapid dissemination of clinical information related to the care of patients with this emerging infection.
Abstract: An outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) that began in Wuhan, China, has spread rapidly, with cases now confirmed in multiple countries. We report the first case of 2019-nCoV infection confirmed in the United States and describe the identification, diagnosis, clinical course, and management of the case, including the patient's initial mild symptoms at presentation with progression to pneumonia on day 9 of illness. This case highlights the importance of close coordination between clinicians and public health authorities at the local, state, and federal levels, as well as the need for rapid dissemination of clinical information related to the care of patients with this emerging infection.

4,970 citations

Posted ContentDOI
12 Mar 2020-medRxiv
TL;DR: In 12 patients with mild to moderately severe illness, SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viable virus were detected early, and prolonged RNA detection suggests the window for diagnosis is long.
Abstract: Introduction More than 93,000 cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been reported worldwide. We describe the epidemiology, clinical course, and virologic characteristics of the first 12 U.S. patients with COVID-19. Methods We collected demographic, exposure, and clinical information from 12 patients confirmed by CDC during January 20–February 5, 2020 to have COVID-19. Respiratory, stool, serum, and urine specimens were submitted for SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR testing, virus culture, and whole genome sequencing. Results Among the 12 patients, median age was 53 years (range: 21–68); 8 were male, 10 had traveled to China, and two were contacts of patients in this series. Commonly reported signs and symptoms at illness onset were fever (n=7) and cough (n=8). Seven patients were hospitalized with radiographic evidence of pneumonia and demonstrated clinical or laboratory signs of worsening during the second week of illness. Three were treated with the investigational antiviral remdesivir. All patients had SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in respiratory specimens, typically for 2–3 weeks after illness onset, with lowest rRT-PCR Ct values often detected in the first week. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected after reported symptom resolution in seven patients. SARS-CoV-2 was cultured from respiratory specimens, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in stool from 7/10 patients. Conclusions In 12 patients with mild to moderately severe illness, SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viable virus were detected early, and prolonged RNA detection suggests the window for diagnosis is long. Hospitalized patients showed signs of worsening in the second week after illness onset.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ian Hennessee, Victoria Shelus, Cristin McArdle, Maren Wolf, Sabrina Schatzman, Ann Carpenter, Faisal Syed Minhaj, Julia Petras, Shama Cash-Goldwasser, Meghan Maloney, Lynn E. Sosa, Sydney A. Jones, Anil T. Mangla, Rachel Harold, Jason Beverley, Katharine Saunders, Jeremy N Adams, Danielle Stanek, Amanda Feldpausch, Jessica Pavlick, M. Cahill, Victoria O'Dell, Moon Jung Kim, Jemma Alarcón, Lauren E Finn, Maura Goss, Monique M. Duwell, David A. Crum, Thelonious W. Williams, Katrina Hansen, Megan Heddy, Krystle Mallory, Darby S McDermott, Mervin Keith Q. Cuadera, Eric Adler, Ellen H. Lee, Amanda Ruth Shinall, C. Thomas, Erin K Ricketts, Tammy Koonce, Dana B Rynk, Kelly E. Cogswell, Meagan L McLafferty, Dana Perella, Catherine Stockdale, BreeAnna Dell, Mellisa Roskosky, Stephen White, K. R. Davis, Rania S. Milleron, Skyler Mackey, L. Barringer, Hollianne Bruce, Debra K. Barrett, Marisa A D’Angeli, Anna Kocharian, Rachel Klos, Patrick Dawson, Sascha R. Ellington, Oren Mayer, Shana E. Godfred-Cato, Sarah M Labuda, David W. Mccormick, Andrea M. McCollum, Agam K Rao, Johanna S. Salzer, Anne Kimball, Jeremy A W Gold, Rick Berumen, G. C. Cosentino, Shiffen Getabecha, Carol A. Glaser, Kaitlin Grosgebauer, Kathleen Harriman, M. Haw, Ama Kamali, Chantha Kath, Elissa Kim, Linda S. Lewis, Darpun Sachdev, Maria Salas, Cameron Stainken, Debra A. Wadford, P. Peters, Akanksha Vaidya, Susan Hocevar Adkins, ;. N. Baird, Lisa C. Barrios, Amy Beeson, D. Blackburn, Brian Borah, Eleanor S. Click, Whitni Davidson, Romeo R. Galang, Kaitlin Hufstetler, Helena J. Hutchins, Athena P. Kourtis, Maureen J Miller, Sapna Bamrah Morris, Emily O'Malley Olsen, Nicole M. Roth, Emily Sims, Kevin Chatham-Stephens 
TL;DR: In this paper , a total of 25,038 monkeypox cases were reported in the United States, primarily among adult gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, accounting for 0.3% of reported cases.
Abstract: Data on monkeypox in children and adolescents aged <18 years are limited (1,2). During May 17–September 24, 2022, a total of 25,038 monkeypox cases were reported in the United States,† primarily among adult gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (3). During this period, CDC and U.S. jurisdictional health departments identified Monkeypox virus (MPXV) infections in 83 persons aged <18 years, accounting for 0.3% of reported cases. Among 28 children aged 0–12 years with monkeypox, 64% were boys, and most had direct skin-to-skin contact with an adult with monkeypox who was caring for the child in a household setting. Among 55 adolescents aged 13–17 years, most were male (89%), and male-to-male sexual contact was the most common presumed exposure route (66%). Most children and adolescents with monkeypox were non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) (47%) or Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) (35%). Most (89%) were not hospitalized, none received intensive care unit (ICU)–level care, and none died. Monkeypox in children and adolescents remains rare in the United States. Ensuring equitable access to monkeypox vaccination, testing, and treatment is a critical public health priority. Vaccination for adolescents with risk factors and provision of prevention information for persons with monkeypox caring for children might prevent additional infections.

24 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Rachel M Burke, Sharon Balter, Emily D. Barnes, Vaughn Barry, Karri Bartlett, Karlyn D. Beer, Isaac Benowitz, Holly M. Biggs, Hollianne Bruce, Jonathan Bryant-Genevier, Jordan Cates, Kevin Chatham-Stephens, Nora Chea, Howard Chiou, Demian Christiansen, Victoria T Chu, Shauna Clark, Sara Cody, Max Cohen, Erin E. Conners, Vishal Dasari, Patrick Dawson, Traci DeSalvo, Matthew Donahue, Alissa Dratch, Lindsey M. Duca, Jeffrey S. Duchin, Jonathan W. Dyal, Leora R. Feldstein, Marty Fenstersheib, Marc J. C. Fischer, Rebecca Fisher, Chelsea Foo, Brandi Freeman-Ponder, Alicia M. Fry, Jessica Gant, Romesh Gautom, Isaac Ghinai, Prabhu Gounder, Cheri Grigg, Jeffrey D. Gunzenhauser, Aron J. Hall, George Han, Thomas Haupt, Michelle Holshue, Jennifer C. Hunter, Mireille B. Ibrahim, Max W. Jacobs, M. Claire Jarashow, Kiran Joshi, Talar Kamali, Vance Kawakami, Moon Kim, Hannah L Kirking, Amanda Kita-Yarbro, Rachel Klos, Miwako Kobayashi, Anna Kocharian, Misty Lang, Jennifer E. Layden, Eva Leidman, Scott Lindquist, Stephen Lindstrom, Ruth Link-Gelles, Mariel Marlow, Claire P. Mattison, Nancy McClung, Tristan D. McPherson, Lynn Mello, Claire M Midgley, Shannon A. Novosad, Megan T. Patel, Kristen Pettrone, Satish K. Pillai, Ian W. Pray, Heather E. Reese, Heather J. Rhodes, Susan Robinson, Melissa A. Rolfes, Janell Routh, Rachel Rubin, Sarah L. Rudman, Denny Russell, Sarah Scott, Varun Shetty, Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat, Elizabeth Soda, Christopher Spitters, Bryan Stierman, Rebecca Sunenshine, Dawn Terashita, Elizabeth Traub, Grace M Vahey, Jennifer R. Verani, Megan J. Wallace, Matthew Westercamp, Jonathan M. Wortham, Amy Xie, Anna R Yousaf, Matthew Zahn 
02 Sep 2020-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The results from these contact tracing investigations suggest that household members, especially significant others, of COVID-19 cases are at highest risk of becoming infected.
Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in Wuhan, China and has since become pandemic. In response to the first cases identified in the United States, close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases were investigated to enable early identification and isolation of additional cases and to learn more about risk factors for transmission. Close contacts of nine early travel-related cases in the United States were identified and monitored daily for development of symptoms (active monitoring). Selected close contacts (including those with exposures categorized as higher risk) were targeted for collection of additional exposure information and respiratory samples. Respiratory samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Four hundred four close contacts were actively monitored in the jurisdictions that managed the travel-related cases. Three hundred thirty-eight of the 404 close contacts provided at least basic exposure information, of whom 159 close contacts had ≥1 set of respiratory samples collected and tested. Across all actively monitored close contacts, two additional symptomatic COVID-19 cases (i.e., secondary cases) were identified; both secondary cases were in spouses of travel-associated case patients. When considering only household members, all of whom had ≥1 respiratory sample tested for SARS-CoV-2, the secondary attack rate (i.e., the number of secondary cases as a proportion of total close contacts) was 13% (95% CI: 4-38%). The results from these contact tracing investigations suggest that household members, especially significant others, of COVID-19 cases are at highest risk of becoming infected. The importance of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers is also underlined. Isolation of persons with COVID-19, in combination with quarantine of exposed close contacts and practice of everyday preventive behaviors, is important to mitigate spread of COVID-19.

20 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Rachel M Burke, Sharon Balter1, Emily D. Barnes1, Vaughn Barry, Karri Bartlett2, Karlyn D. Beer, Isaac Benowitz, Holly M. Biggs, Hollianne Bruce, Jonathan Bryant-Genevier, Jordan Cates, Kevin Chatham-Stephens3, Nora Chea, Howard Chiou, Demian Christiansen, Victoria T Chu, Shauna Clark4, Sara Cody, Max Cohen, Erin E. Conners, Vishal Dasari, Patrick Dawson, Traci DeSalvo5, Matthew Donahue, Alissa Dratch, Lindsey M. Duca, Jeffrey S. Duchin4, Jonathan W. Dyal, Leora R. Feldstein, Marty Fenstersheib, Marc J. C. Fischer, Rebecca Fisher1, Chelsea Foo1, Brandi Freeman-Ponder, Alicia M. Fry, Jessica Gant, Romesh Gautom6, Isaac Ghinai7, Prabhu Gounder, Cheri Grigg, Jeffrey D. Gunzenhauser1, Aron J. Hall, George Han, Thomas Haupt5, Michelle Holshue, Jennifer C. Hunter, Mireille B. Ibrahim1, Max W. Jacobs, M. Claire Jarashow1, Kiran Joshi, Talar Kamali1, Vance Kawakami4, Moon Kim1, Hannah L Kirking, Amanda Kita-Yarbro2, Rachel Klos, Miwako Kobayashi, Anna Kocharian5, Misty Lang, Jennifer E. Layden7, Eva Leidman, Scott Lindquist6, Stephen Lindstrom, Ruth Link-Gelles, Mariel Marlow, Claire P. Mattison8, Nancy McClung, Tristan D. McPherson7, Lynn Mello9, Claire M Midgley, Shannon A. Novosad, Megan T. Patel10, Kristen Pettrone, Satish K. Pillai, Ian W. Pray5, Heather E. Reese, Heather J. Rhodes11, Susan Robinson12, Melissa A. Rolfes, Janell Routh, Rachel Rubin, Sarah L. Rudman, Denny Russell, Sarah Scott, Varun Shetty, Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat, Elizabeth Soda, Christopher Spitters, Bryan Stierman, Rebecca Sunenshine, Dawn Terashita1, Elizabeth Traub1, Grace M Vahey, Jennifer R. Verani, Megan J. Wallace, Matthew Westercamp, Jonathan M. Wortham, Amy Xie, Anna R Yousaf, Matthew Zahn 
03 May 2020-medRxiv
TL;DR: The enhanced contact tracing investigations undertaken around nine early travel-related cases of COVID-19 in the United States identified two cases of secondary transmission, both spouses of travel-associated case patients.
Abstract: Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in Wuhan, China and has since become pandemic. As part of initial response activities in the United States, enhanced contact investigations were conducted to enable early identification and isolation of additional cases and to learn more about risk factors for transmission. Methods Close contacts of nine early travel-related cases in the United States were identified. Close contacts meeting criteria for active monitoring were followed, and selected individuals were targeted for collection of additional exposure details and respiratory samples. Respiratory samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Results There were 404 close contacts who underwent active monitoring in the response jurisdictions; 338 had at least basic exposure data, of whom 159 had ≥1 set of respiratory samples collected and tested. Across all known close contacts under monitoring, two additional cases were identified; both secondary cases were in spouses of travel-associated case patients. The secondary attack rate among household members, all of whom had ≥1 respiratory sample tested, was 13% (95% CI: 4 – 38%). Conclusions The enhanced contact tracing investigations undertaken around nine early travel-related cases of COVID-19 in the United States identified two cases of secondary transmission, both spouses. Rapid detection and isolation of the travel-associated case patients, enabled by public awareness of COVID-19 among travelers from China, may have mitigated transmission risk among close contacts of these cases.

12 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness, and patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings.
Abstract: Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of...

22,622 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuhan Jin Yin-tan hospital between late December, 2019 and Jan 26, 2020 are described.

7,787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 In this research letter, investigators report on the stability of Sars-CoVs and the viability of the two virus under experimental conditions.
Abstract: Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 In this research letter, investigators report on the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 under experimental conditions. The viability of the two virus...

7,412 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 May 2020-JAMA
TL;DR: This case series provides characteristics and early outcomes of sequentially hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in the New York City area and assesses outcomes during hospitalization, such as invasive mechanical ventilation, kidney replacement therapy, and death.
Abstract: Importance There is limited information describing the presenting characteristics and outcomes of US patients requiring hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a US health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants Case series of patients with COVID-19 admitted to 12 hospitals in New York City, Long Island, and Westchester County, New York, within the Northwell Health system. The study included all sequentially hospitalized patients between March 1, 2020, and April 4, 2020, inclusive of these dates. Exposures Confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by positive result on polymerase chain reaction testing of a nasopharyngeal sample among patients requiring admission. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical outcomes during hospitalization, such as invasive mechanical ventilation, kidney replacement therapy, and death. Demographics, baseline comorbidities, presenting vital signs, and test results were also collected. Results A total of 5700 patients were included (median age, 63 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 52-75; range, 0-107 years]; 39.7% female). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (3026; 56.6%), obesity (1737; 41.7%), and diabetes (1808; 33.8%). At triage, 30.7% of patients were febrile, 17.3% had a respiratory rate greater than 24 breaths/min, and 27.8% received supplemental oxygen. The rate of respiratory virus co-infection was 2.1%. Outcomes were assessed for 2634 patients who were discharged or had died at the study end point. During hospitalization, 373 patients (14.2%) (median age, 68 years [IQR, 56-78]; 33.5% female) were treated in the intensive care unit care, 320 (12.2%) received invasive mechanical ventilation, 81 (3.2%) were treated with kidney replacement therapy, and 553 (21%) died. As of April 4, 2020, for patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 1151, 20.2%), 38 (3.3%) were discharged alive, 282 (24.5%) died, and 831 (72.2%) remained in hospital. The median postdischarge follow-up time was 4.4 days (IQR, 2.2-9.3). A total of 45 patients (2.2%) were readmitted during the study period. The median time to readmission was 3 days (IQR, 1.0-4.5) for readmitted patients. Among the 3066 patients who remained hospitalized at the final study follow-up date (median age, 65 years [IQR, 54-75]), the median follow-up at time of censoring was 4.5 days (IQR, 2.4-8.1). Conclusions and Relevance This case series provides characteristics and early outcomes of sequentially hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in the New York City area.

7,282 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Abstract: Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.

6,656 citations