scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Hubertus F.J.M. Koopman

Bio: Hubertus F.J.M. Koopman is an academic researcher from University of Twente. The author has contributed to research in topics: Isometric exercise & Gait (human). The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 114 publications receiving 2501 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The presented anatomical dataset embraces all necessary data for state of the art musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity, and implementation of these data into an (existing) model is likely to significantly improve the estimation of muscle forces.

382 citations

31 Jul 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, a complete and consistent anatomical dataset containing the orientations of joints (hip, knee, ankle and subtalar joints), muscle parameters (optimum length, physiological cross sectional area), and geometrical parameters (attachment sites, ‘via’ points) was presented.
Abstract: Background: To assist in the treatment of gait disorders, an inverse and forward 3D musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity will be useful that allows to evaluate if–then scenarios. Currently available anatomical datasets do not comprise sufficiently accurate and complete information to construct such a model. The aim of this paper is to present a complete and consistent anatomical dataset, containing the orientations of joints (hip, knee, ankle and subtalar joints), muscle parameters (optimum length, physiological cross sectional area), and geometrical parameters (attachment sites, ‘via’ points). Methods: One lower extremity, taken from a male embalmed specimen, was studied. Position and geometry were measured with a 3D-digitizer. Optotrak was used for measurement of rotation axes of joints. Sarcomere length was measured by laser diffraction. Findings: A total of 38 muscles were measured. Each muscle was divided in different muscle lines of action based on muscle morphology. 14 Ligaments of the hip, knee and ankle were included. Interpretation: The presented anatomical dataset embraces all necessary data for state of the art musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Implementation of these data into an (existing) model is likely to significantly improve the estimation of muscle forces and will thus make the use of the model as a clinical tool more feasible.

350 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that the combination of the instrumented shoe and inertial sensing is a promising tool for the assessment of the dynamics of foot and ankle in an ambulatory setting.
Abstract: Ground reaction force (GRF) measurement is important in the analysis of human body movements. The main drawback of the existing measurement systems is the restriction to a laboratory environment. This paper proposes an ambulatory system for assessing the dynamics of ankle and foot, which integrates the measurement of the GRF with the measurement of human body movement. The GRF and the center of pressure (CoP) are measured using two six-degrees-of-freedom force sensors mounted beneath the shoe. The movement of foot and lower leg is measured using three miniature inertial sensors, two rigidly attached to the shoe and one on the lower leg. The proposed system is validated using a force plate and an optical position measurement system as a reference. The results show good correspondence between both measurement systems, except for the ankle power estimation. The root mean square (RMS) difference of the magnitude of the GRF over 10 evaluated trials was (0.012 plusmn 0.001) N/N (mean plusmn standard deviation), being (1.1 plusmn 0.1)% of the maximal GRF magnitude. It should be noted that the forces, moments, and powers are normalized with respect to body weight. The CoP estimation using both methods shows good correspondence, as indicated by the RMS difference of (5.1 plusmn 0.7) mm, corresponding to (1.7 plusmn 0.3)% of the length of the shoe. The RMS difference between the magnitudes of the heel position estimates was calculated as (18 plusmn 6) mm, being (1.4 plusmn 0.5)% of the maximal magnitude. The ankle moment RMS difference was (0.004 plusmn 0.001) Nm/N, being (2.3 plusmn 0.5)% of the maximal magnitude. Finally, the RMS difference of the estimated power at the ankle was (0.02 plusmn 0.005) W/N, being (14 plusmn 5)% of the maximal power. This power difference is caused by an inaccurate estimation of the angular velocities using the optical reference measurement system, which is due to considering the foot as a single segment. The ambulatory system considers separate heel and forefoot segments, thus allowing an additional foot moment and power to be estimated. Based on the results of this research, it is concluded that the combination of the instrumented shoe and inertial sensing is a promising tool for the assessment of the dynamics of foot and ankle in an ambulatory setting

199 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: With this approach it is possible to measure several consecutive steps without any constraint on foot placement and compute a standard inverse dynamics analysis with the estimated GRF.

164 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A computational method to perform inverse dynamics-based simulations without force plates is presented, which both improves the dynamic consistency as well as removes the model's dependency on measured external forces.

142 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
12 Aug 2011
TL;DR: This paper presents a novel orientation algorithm designed to support a computationally efficient, wearable inertial human motion tracking system for rehabilitation applications, applicable to inertial measurement units (IMUs) consisting of tri-axis gyroscopes and accelerometers, and magnetic angular rate and gravity sensor arrays that also include tri- axis magnetometers.
Abstract: This paper presents a novel orientation algorithm designed to support a computationally efficient, wearable inertial human motion tracking system for rehabilitation applications. It is applicable to inertial measurement units (IMUs) consisting of tri-axis gyroscopes and accelerometers, and magnetic angular rate and gravity (MARG) sensor arrays that also include tri-axis magnetometers. The MARG implementation incorporates magnetic distortion compensation. The algorithm uses a quaternion representation, allowing accelerometer and magnetometer data to be used in an analytically derived and optimised gradient descent algorithm to compute the direction of the gyroscope measurement error as a quaternion derivative. Performance has been evaluated empirically using a commercially available orientation sensor and reference measurements of orientation obtained using an optical measurement system. Performance was also benchmarked against the propriety Kalman-based algorithm of orientation sensor. Results indicate the algorithm achieves levels of accuracy matching that of the Kalman based algorithm; < 0.8° static RMS error, < 1.7° dynamic RMS error. The implications of the low computational load and ability to operate at small sampling rates significantly reduces the hardware and power necessary for wearable inertial movement tracking, enabling the creation of lightweight, inexpensive systems capable of functioning for extended periods of time.

1,803 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Research carried out on locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs), i.e. neural circuits capable of producing coordinated patterns of high-dimensional rhythmic output signals while receiving only simple, low-dimensional, input signals, is reviewed.

1,737 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The modelling method presented represents a good way to estimate in vivo muscle forces during movement tasks and changing the muscle model to one that is more physiologically correct produced better predictions.

1,049 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Feb 2012-Sensors
TL;DR: The gait analysis methods based on wearable sensors is divided into gait kinematics, gait kinetics, and electromyography, which are expected to play an increasingly important role in clinical applications.
Abstract: Gait analysis using wearable sensors is an inexpensive, convenient, and efficient manner of providing useful information for multiple health-related applications. As a clinical tool applied in the rehabilitation and diagnosis of medical conditions and sport activities, gait analysis using wearable sensors shows great prospects. The current paper reviews available wearable sensors and ambulatory gait analysis methods based on the various wearable sensors. After an introduction of the gait phases, the principles and features of wearable sensors used in gait analysis are provided. The gait analysis methods based on wearable sensors is divided into gait kinematics, gait kinetics, and electromyography. Studies on the current methods are reviewed, and applications in sports, rehabilitation, and clinical diagnosis are summarized separately. With the development of sensor technology and the analysis method, gait analysis using wearable sensors is expected to play an increasingly important role in clinical applications.

926 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
19 Feb 2014-Sensors
TL;DR: An increasing number of research works demonstrate that various parameters such as precision, conformability, usability or transportability have indicated that the portable systems based on body sensors are promising methods for gait analysis.
Abstract: This article presents a review of the methods used in recognition and analysis of the human gait from three different approaches: image processing, floor sensors and sensors placed on the body. Progress in new technologies has led the development of a series of devices and techniques which allow for objective evaluation, making measurements more efficient and effective and providing specialists with reliable information. Firstly, an introduction of the key gait parameters and semi-subjective methods is presented. Secondly, technologies and studies on the different objective methods are reviewed. Finally, based on the latest research, the characteristics of each method are discussed. 40% of the reviewed articles published in late 2012 and 2013 were related to non-wearable systems, 37.5% presented inertial sensor-based systems, and the remaining 22.5% corresponded to other wearable systems. An increasing number of research works demonstrate that various parameters such as precision, conformability, usability or transportability have indicated that the portable systems based on body sensors are promising methods for gait analysis.

862 citations