“Liquid biopsy” focusing on the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of patients with cancer has received enormous attention because of its obvious clinical implications for personalized medicine. Analyses of CTCs and ctDNA have paved new diagnostic avenues and are, to date, the cornerstones of liquid biopsy diagnostics. The present review focuses on key areas of clinical applications of CTCs and ctDNA, including detection of cancer, prediction of prognosis in patients with curable disease, monitoring systemic therapies, and stratification of patients based on the detection of therapeutic targets or resistance mechanisms.

Significance: The application of CTCs and ctDNA for the early detection of cancer is of high public interest, but it faces serious challenges regarding specificity and sensitivity of the current assays. Prediction of prognosis in patients with curable disease can already be achieved in several tumor entities, particularly in breast cancer. Monitoring the success or failure of systemic therapies (i.e., chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or other targeted therapies) by sequential measurements of CTCs or ctDNA is also feasible. Interventional studies on treatment stratification based on the analysis of CTCs and ctDNA are needed to implement liquid biopsy into personalized medicine. Cancer Discov; 6(5); 479–91. ©2016 AACR.

/pdf/clinical-applications-of-circulating-tumor-cells-and-rk9p9044ax.pdf

Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA as Liquid Biopsy.

Next-generation sequencing of cell-free circulating solid tumor DNA addresses two challenges in contemporary cancer care. First this method of massively parallel and deep sequencing enables assessment of a comprehensive panel of genomic targets from a single sample, and second, it obviates the need for repeat invasive tissue biopsies. Digital Sequencing™ is a novel method for high-quality sequencing of circulating tumor DNA simultaneously across a comprehensive panel of over 50 cancer-related genes with a simple blood test. Here we report the analytic and clinical validation of the gene panel. Analytic sensitivity down to 0.1% mutant allele fraction is demonstrated via serial dilution studies of known samples. Near-perfect analytic specificity (> 99.9999%) enables complete coverage of many genes without the false positives typically seen with traditional sequencing assays at mutant allele frequencies or fractions below 5%. We compared digital sequencing of plasma-derived cell-free DNA to tissue-based sequencing on 165 consecutive matched samples from five outside centers in patients with stage III-IV solid tumor cancers. Clinical sensitivity of plasma-derived NGS was 85.0%, comparable to 80.7% sensitivity for tissue. The assay success rate on 1,000 consecutive samples in clinical practice was 99.8%. Digital sequencing of plasma-derived DNA is indicated in advanced cancer patients to prevent repeated invasive biopsies when the initial biopsy is inadequate, unobtainable for genomic testing, or uninformative, or when the patient's cancer has progressed despite treatment. Its clinical utility is derived from reduction in the costs, complications and delays associated with invasive tissue biopsies for genomic testing.

/pdf/analytical-and-clinical-validation-of-a-digital-sequencing-3r47f1jzpf.pdf

Analytical and clinical validation of a digital sequencing panel for quantitative, highly accurate evaluation of cell-free circulating tumor DNA

Single-cell technologies have contributed to unravelling tumour heterogeneity, now considered a hallmark of cancer and one of the main causes of tumour resistance to cancer therapies. Liquid biopsy (LB), defined as the detection and analysis of cells or cell products released by tumours into the blood, offers an appealing minimally invasive approach that allows the characterization and monitoring of tumour heterogeneity in individual patients. Here, we will review and discuss how circulating tumour cell (CTC) analysis at single-cell resolution provides unique insights into tumour heterogeneity that are not revealed by analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) derived from LBs. The molecular analysis of CTCs provides complementary information to that of genomic aberrations determined using ctDNA to fully describe many different cellular components (for example, DNA, RNA, proteins and metabolites) that can influence tumour heterogeneity.

Unravelling tumour heterogeneity by single-cell profiling of circulating tumour cells

Recent technological advances have enabled the detection and detailed characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood samples from patients with cancer. Often referred to as a "liquid biopsy," CTCs and ctDNA are expected to provide real-time monitoring of tumor evolution and therapeutic efficacy, with the potential for improved cancer diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we focus on these opportunities as well as the challenges that should be addressed so that these tools may eventually be implemented into routine clinical care.

https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/clincanres/21/21/4786.full.pdf

Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA: Challenges and Opportunities on the Path to Clinical Utility

https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.molonc.2014.12.003

Circulating tumor DNA as a non-invasive substitute to metastasis biopsy for tumor genotyping and personalized medicine in a prospective trial across all tumor types

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a new circulating tumor biomarker which might be used as a prognostic biomarker in a way similar to circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Here, we used the high prevalence of TP53 mutations in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to compare ctDNA and CTC detection rates and prognostic value in metastatic TNBC patients. Forty patients were enrolled before starting a new line of treatment. TP53 mutations were characterized in archived tumor tissues and in plasma DNA using two next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms in parallel. Archived tumor tissue was sequenced successfully for 31/40 patients. TP53 mutations were found in 26/31 (84%) of tumor samples. The same mutation was detected in the matched plasma of 21/26 (81%) patients with an additional mutation found only in the plasma for one patient. Mutated allele fractions ranged from 2 to 70% (median 5%). The observed correlation between the two NGS approaches (R2 = 0.903) suggested that ctDNA levels data were quantitative. Among the 27 patients with TP53 mutations, CTC count was ≥1 in 19 patients (70%) and ≥5 in 14 patients (52%). ctDNA levels had no prognostic impact on time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS), whereas CTC numbers were correlated with OS (p = 0.04) and marginally with TTP (p = 0.06). Performance status and elevated LDH also had significant prognostic impact. Here, absence of prognostic impact of baseline ctDNA level suggests that mechanisms of ctDNA release in metastatic TNBC may involve, beyond tumor burden, biological features that do not dramatically affect patient outcome.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ijc.29265

Circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients.

Background Preliminary reports suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used as a prognostic marker in a way akin to circulating tumor cells (CTC) in metastatic breast cancer patients. However ctDNA detection is often performed on multiple mutations, combining heterogeneous techniques. Here we used the high prevalence of TP53 mutations in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (TNMBC) to compare CTC and ctDNA detection rates and prognostic value. Methods A cohort of 40 patients treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) was enrolled before starting a new line of treatment for TNMBC. CTC were detected by the CellSearch system (in 7.5 mL of blood). Using massively parallel sequencing (NGS), TP53 mutations were first characterized in tumor tissue, then in plasma DNA extracted from fresh frozen plasma samples (from 15-20 mL of blood). ctDNA detection was performed using high depth targeted sequencing using two platforms in parallel (Illumina HiSeq 2500 and Roche 454). Libraries for Illumina were prepared following the TAm-Seq procedure (Forshew et al, Sci Transl Med 2012), with preamplification of all coding TP53 exons and flanking untranslated regions followed by both paired-end 150bp Illumina and 454/Roche sequencing. CTC, ctDNA and usual patient characteristics were correlated with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Results Archived tumor (FFPE or frozen) tissue was available for 36 patients, and 31 were successfully sequenced: TP53 mutations were found in 27 patients. As measured on the Illumina platform, ctDNA was detected in 21/27 patients (81%), ranging from 48 to 648,000 copies/mL of plasma (median 1620). Mutant allele fraction in circulating cell-free DNA ranged from 2 to 70% (median 5%). Comparison between ctDNA levels measured by Illumina and 454/Roche platforms in plasma displayed a good correlation (R2 = 0.903), with a single discordance. ≥1 CTC were detected in 19 of these 27 patients (70%). Strikingly, high ctDNA levels had prognostic impact neither on OS, nor on TTP, whatever the dataset used (Illumina or 454) whereas CTC≥5/7.5 mL were correlated with OS (p=0.04) and marginally with TTP (p=0.06). Other known usual factors, such as poor performance status, elevated LDH and number of previous treatment lines had also significant prognostic factors in this cohort. CTC and ctDNA early changes during treatment were available for 12 patients and changes (increase/decrease) of the two biomarkers were globally similar. Conclusion Demonstrating a good sensitivity (81%), ctDNA by the TAm-Seq is more frequently detected than CTCs in the 27 TNMBC with TP53 mutations. The observed correlation between the 2 massively parallel sequencing approaches suggested that ctDNA levels data were quantitative. In contrast to other usual prognostic factors, baseline ctDNA level did not demonstrate a prognostic impact,in this proof-of-principle study, suggesting that mechanisms of ctDNA release in TNMBC rely on biological features that do not dramatically impact patient’s outcome. Citation Format: Francois-Clement Bidard, Jordan Madic, Anna Kiialainen, Fabian Birzele, Guillemette Ramey, Quentin Leroy, Thomas Rio Frio, Virginie Raynal, Virginie Bernard, Alban Lermine, Inga Clausen, Nicolas Giroud, Roland Schmucki, Carsten Horn, Olivia Spleiss, Olivier Lantz, Marc-Henri Stern, Martin Weisser, Ronald Lebofsky, Jean-Yves Pierga. Circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-8.

Inga Clausen

Papers

Circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients.

Abstract PD3-8: Circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients