scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ingo Zettler

Bio: Ingo Zettler is an academic researcher from University of Copenhagen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Personality & Big Five personality traits. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 120 publications receiving 3274 citations. Previous affiliations of Ingo Zettler include FernUniversität Hagen & University of Tübingen.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations, which is called the Dark Factor of Personality (D).
Abstract: Many negatively connoted personality traits (often termed "dark traits") have been introduced to account for ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior. Herein, we provide a unifying, comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding dark personality in terms of a general dispositional tendency of which dark traits arise as specific manifestations. That is, we theoretically specify the common core of dark traits, which we call the Dark Factor of Personality (D). The fluid concept of D captures individual differences in the tendency to maximize one's individual utility-disregarding, accepting, or malevolently provoking disutility for others-accompanied by beliefs that serve as justifications. To critically test D, we unify and extend prior work methodologically and empirically by considering a large number of dark traits simultaneously, using statistical approaches tailored to capture both the common core and the unique content of dark traits, and testing the predictive validity of both D and the unique content of dark traits with respect to diverse criteria including fully consequential and incentive-compatible behavior. In a series of four studies (N > 2,500), we provide evidence in support of the theoretical conceptualization of D, show that dark traits can be understood as specific manifestations of D, demonstrate that D predicts a multitude of criteria in the realm of ethically, morally, and socially questionable behavior, and illustrate that D does not depend on any particular indicator variable included. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

233 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored the predictive power of the sixth personality dimension, Honesty-Humility, with respect to economic and cooperative behavior, and found that individuals low in Honesty−Humility made selfish decisions and only shifted towards a more fair allocation whenever the other was empowered to punish defection.

224 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper showed that Honesty-Humility, but not Agreeableness, indeed predicts active cooperation and non-exploitation in the ultimatum game, and they found a pattern of two concurrent selective associations, supporting the theoretical distinction between the two factors.

190 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Dunnette et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated whether interactions of the Five-Factor Model constructs of agreeableness and conscientiousness with political skill predict job performance, and they found that its interaction with political skills also significantly predicted job performance.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a two-study investigation of both the construct validity and antecedents and consequences of the political skill construct is presented. But no effort has been made to also identify a single, higher-order factor solution through second-order Factor Analysis.
Abstract: Purpose – Political skill is measured with the political skill inventory (PSI), and the construct is composed of four distinct dimensions. Previous validation studies of the PSI found evidence in support of the four‐factor structure, but only using self‐reports. Furthermore, no efforts have been made to also identify a single, higher‐order factor solution through second‐order factor analysis. The present research aims to expand on prior work and report on a two‐study investigation of both the construct validity and antecedents and consequences of the political skill construct.Design/methodology/approach – To test construct validity, Study 1 combined self‐ and other reports of political skill from 467 employees in a confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 used longitudinal data from 202 employees to constructively replicate Study 1 results and to test hypotheses regarding the antecedents and consequences of political skill.Findings – The results of Study 1 confirmed both a four‐factor and a single higher‐ord...

162 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
05 Feb 1897-Science

3,125 citations

01 Jan 1993

2,271 citations

01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The applied missing data analysis is universally compatible with any devices to read and is available in the digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly.
Abstract: Thank you for downloading applied missing data analysis. Maybe you have knowledge that, people have look hundreds times for their favorite readings like this applied missing data analysis, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than enjoying a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some malicious bugs inside their laptop. applied missing data analysis is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our digital library hosts in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the applied missing data analysis is universally compatible with any devices to read.

1,924 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The Social Psychology of Groups as discussed by the authors is a seminal work in the field of family studies, where the authors introduced, defined, and illustrated basic concepts in an effort to explain the simplest of social phenomena, the two-person relationship.
Abstract: The Social Psychology of Groups. J. W Thibaut & H. H. Kelley. New York: alley, 1959. The team of Thibaut and Kelley goes back to 1946 when, after serving in different units of the armed services psychology program, the authors joined the Research Center for Group Dynamics, first at M.LT and then at the University of Michigan. Their continued association eventuated in appointments as fellows at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, 19561957. It is during these years that their collaboration resulted in the publication of The Social Psychology of Groups. The book was designed to "bring order and coherence to present-day research in interpersonal relations and group functioning." To accomplish this aim, the authors introduced, defined, and illustrated basic concepts in an effort to explain the simplest of social phenomena, the two-person relationship. These basic principles and concepts were then employed to illuminate larger problems and more complex social relationships and to examine the significance of such concepts as roles, norm, power, group cohesiveness, and status. The lasting legacy of this book is derived from the fact that the concepts and principles discussed therein serve as a foundation for one of the dominant conceptual frameworks in the field of family studies today-the social exchange framework. Specifically, much of our contemporary thinking about the process of interpersonal attraction and about how individuals evaluate their close relationships has been influenced by the theory and concepts introduced in The Social Psychology of Groups. Today, as a result of Thibaut and Kelley, we think of interpersonal attraction as resulting from the unique valence of driving and restraining forces, rewards and costs, subjectively thought to be available from a specific relationship and its competing alternatives. We understand, as well, that relationships are evaluated through complex and subjectively based comparative processes. As a result, when we think about assessing the degree to which individuals are satisfied with their relationships, we take into consideration the fact that individuals differ in terms of the importance they attribute to different aspects of a relationship (e.g., financial security, sexual fulfillment, companionship). We also take into consideration the fact that individuals differ in terms of the levels of rewards and costs that they believe are realistically obtainable and deserved from a relationship. In addition, as a result of Thibaut and Kelley's theoretical focus on the concept of dependence and the interrelationship between attraction and dependence, there has evolved within the field of family studies a deeper appreciation for the complexities and variability found within relationships. Individuals are dependent on their relationships, according to Thibaut and Kelley, when the outcomes derived from the existing relationship exceed those perceived to be available in competing alternatives. Individuals who are highly dependent on their relationships are less likely to act to end their relationships. This dependence and the stability it engenders may or may not be voluntary, depending on the degree to which individuals are attracted to and satisfied with their relationships. When individuals are both attracted to and dependent on their relationships, they can be thought of as voluntarily participating in their relationship. That is, they are likely to commit themselves to the partner and relationship and actively work for its continuance. Thibaut and Kelley termed those relationships characterized by low levels of satisfaction and high levels of dependence "nonvoluntary relationships. …

1,894 citations

01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: “As a boy and then as an adult, I never lost my wonder at the personality that was Einstein.”
Abstract: 在翟象俊主编的《大学英语》第2册第5单元中,有这样一个句子:“As a boy and then as an adult, I never lost my wonder at the personality that was Einstein.”教参中指出“the personality that was Einstein”应理解为“the personality which was the most striking characteristic of Einstein”,该句译为“作为一个孩子,到后来作为一个成人,我一直对爱因斯坦的个性惊叹不已”。很明显,在这里译者把“personality”理解为“个性,人格”,但本人认为应译为“人物,名人”更妥。“personality”可作“个性,人格”讲,但它还有另外一个重要意思。在陆谷孙主编的《英汉大词典》(1993年版)中,“personality”第3条释义为:“个人,人物,名人”:“appoint a personality to lead a campaign,派一个人去领导一场运动”。“a personality in the news,新闻人物”。在...

1,096 citations