Author
Irena Rektorová
Other affiliations: European Institute, Masaryk University
Bio: Irena Rektorová is an academic researcher from Central European Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dementia & Parkinson's disease. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 204 publications receiving 4774 citations. Previous affiliations of Irena Rektorová include European Institute & Masaryk University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Paris 12 Val de Marne University1, University Medical Center Groningen2, Eindhoven University of Technology3, University Hospital of Lausanne4, French Institute of Health and Medical Research5, Università Campus Bio-Medico6, University of Belgrade7, University of Cologne8, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich9, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne10, Turku University Hospital11, University of Regensburg12, Università telematica San Raffaele13, Paris Descartes University14, Paracelsus Private Medical University of Salzburg15, University of Bern16, Universidade Nova de Lisboa17, Medical Park18, University of Göttingen19, University of Messina20, Central European Institute of Technology21, University of Siena22, University of Turku23, University of Tübingen24
TL;DR: These updated recommendations take into account all rTMS publications, including data prior to 2014, as well as currently reviewed literature until the end of 2018, and are based on the differences reached in therapeutic efficacy of real vs. sham rT MS protocols.
822 citations
••
TL;DR: The aim of this revised international guideline was to present a peer‐reviewed evidence‐based statement for the guidance of practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists, and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with AD.
Abstract: The aim of this revised international guideline was to present
a peer-reviewed evidence-based statement for the guidance of
practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians,
psychiatrists, and other specialist physicians responsible for
the care of patients with AD. Mild cognitive impairment and
non- Alzheimer dementias are not included in this guideline.
Methods: The task force working group reviewed evidence from
original research articles, meta-analysis, and systematic
reviews, published before May 2009. The evidence was classified
and consensus recommendations graded (A, B, or C) according to
the EFNS guidance. Where there was a lack of evidence, but
clear consensus, good practice points were provided. Results:
The recommendations for clinical diagnosis, blood tests,
neuropsychology, neuroimaging, electroencephalography,
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, genetic testing, disclosure
of diagnosis, treatment of AD, behavioural and psychological
symptoms in dementia, legal issues, counselling and support for
caregivers were all revised as compared with the previous EFNS
guideline. Conclusion: A number of new recommendations and good
practice points are made, namely in CSF, neuropsychology,
neuroimaging and reviewing non-evidence based therapies. The
assessment, interpretation, and treatment of symptoms,
disability, needs, and caregiver stress during the course of AD
require the contribution of many different professionals. These
professionals should adhere to these guideline to improve the
diagnosis and management of AD.
462 citations
••
University of Florence1, Charles University in Prague2, University of Helsinki3, Helsinki University Central Hospital4, Akershus University Hospital5, The Catholic University of America6, Istanbul University7, university of lille8, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy9, Masaryk University10, Polish Academy of Sciences11, Karolinska Institutet12, UCL Institute of Neurology13, University of Graz14, University of Belgrade15, VU University Medical Center16
TL;DR: The aim is to present a peer‐reviewed evidence‐based statement for the guidance of practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with dementing disorders.
Abstract: Background and objectives: The last version of the EFNS dementia guidelines is from 2007. In 2010, the revised guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were published. The current guidelines involve the revision of the dementia syndromes outside of AD, notably vascular cognitive impairment, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, Parkinson’s disease dementia, Huntington’s disease, prion diseases, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, limbic encephalitis and other toxic and metabolic disorders. The aim is to present a peer-reviewed evidence-based statement for the guidance of practice for clinical neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with dementing disorders. It represents a statement of minimum desirable standards for practice guidance.
261 citations
••
TL;DR: An 8‐month multicentre prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the effects of dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole and pergolide as add‐on to L‐dopa therapy on depression.
Abstract: An 8-month multicentre prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the effects of dopamine receptor agonists pramipexole (PPX; Mirapexin) and pergolide (PRG; Permax) as add-on to L-dopa therapy on depression [Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)] in 41 non-demented patients (25 men, 16 women) suffering from both mild or moderate depression and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The assessment was performed by a blinded independent observer. Motor symptoms (UPDRS III), motor complications (UPDRS IV), activities of daily living (UPDRS II and VI) and depressive symptoms as measured by Self - Rating Depression Scale by Zung were evaluated in an open-label design. The average value of Zung scores decreased significantly in both groups with no statistical difference between both groups. A significant decrease in the average value of MADRS scores was present only in the PPX group. The average UPDRS scores decreased significantly with no statistical difference between both groups at the comparable average total daily dose of both preparations. In both cases, the total daily dose of L-dopa decreased significantly but the decrease was statistically more pronounced in the PRG group. Our results demonstrate the antidepressant effect of PPX in patients with PD while we can't make any conclusions with regard to antidepressant effect of PRG.
239 citations
••
TL;DR: Experimental results showed that an analysis of kinematic and pressure features during handwriting can help assess subtle characteristics of handwriting and discriminate between PD patients and healthy controls.
201 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
[...]
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …
33,785 citations
••
University College London1, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust2, King's College London3, University of Melbourne4, University of Exeter5, Brighton and Sussex Medical School6, University of Manchester7, Tel Aviv University8, Johns Hopkins University9, University of Michigan10, University of Washington11, Kaiser Permanente12, University of Edinburgh13, University of Montpellier14, Dalhousie University15, University of Southern California16, Innlandet Hospital Trust17, University of Oslo18
TL;DR: The Lancet Commission on Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care met to consolidate the huge strides that have been made and the emerging knowledge as to what the authors should do to prevent and manage dementia.
3,826 citations
•
2,428 citations
••
TL;DR: Some non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, including depression, constipation, pain, genitourinary problems, and sleep disorders, can be improved with available treatments and need the introduction of novel non-dopaminergic drugs.
Abstract: The clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease rests on the identification of the characteristics related to dopamine deficiency that are a consequence of degeneration of the substantia nigra pars compacta. However, non-dopaminergic and non-motor symptoms are sometimes present before diagnosis and almost inevitably emerge with disease progression. Indeed, non-motor symptoms dominate the clinical picture of advanced Parkinson's disease and contribute to severe disability, impaired quality of life, and shortened life expectancy. By contrast with the dopaminergic symptoms of the disease, for which treatment is available, non-motor symptoms are often poorly recognised and inadequately treated. However, attention is now being focused on the recognition and quantitation of non-motor symptoms, which will form the basis of improved treatments. Some non-motor symptoms, including depression, constipation, pain, genitourinary problems, and sleep disorders, can be improved with available treatments. Other non-motor symptoms can be more refractory and need the introduction of novel non-dopaminergic drugs. Inevitably, the development of treatments that can slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson's disease and its multicentric neurodegeneration provides the best hope of curing non-motor symptoms.
2,257 citations
•
TL;DR: The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson9s disease as discussed by the authors have been proposed for clinical diagnosis, which are intended for use in clinical research, but may also be used to guide clinical diagnosis.
Abstract: Objective
To present the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson9s disease.
Background
Although several diagnostic criteria for Parkinson9s disease have been proposed, none have been officially adopted by an official Parkinson society. Moreover, the commonest-used criteria, the UK brain bank, were created more than 25 years ago. In recognition of the lack of standard criteria, the MDS initiated a task force to design new diagnostic criteria for clinical Parkinson9s disease.
Methods/Results
The MDS-PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research, but may also be used to guide clinical diagnosis. The benchmark is expert clinical diagnosis; the criteria aim to systematize the diagnostic process, to make it reproducible across centers and applicable by clinicians with less expertise. Although motor abnormalities remain central, there is increasing recognition of non-motor manifestations; these are incorporated into both the current criteria and particularly into separate criteria for prodromal PD. Similar to previous criteria, the MDS-PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core disease feature, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor and/or rigidity. Explicit instructions for defining these cardinal features are included. After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies upon three categories of diagnostic features; absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of PD diagnosis). Two levels of certainty are delineated: Clinically-established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity), and Probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity).
Conclusion
The MDS criteria retain elements proven valuable in previous criteria and omit aspects that are no longer justified, thereby encapsulating diagnosis according to current knowledge. As understanding of PD expands, criteria will need continuous revision to accommodate these advances. Disclosure: Dr. Postuma has received personal compensation for activities with Roche Diagnostics Corporation and Biotie Therapies. Dr. Berg has received research support from Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), the German Parkinson Association and Novartis GmbH.
1,655 citations