scispace - formally typeset
I

Irene S. Um

Researcher at University of Sydney

Publications -  17
Citations -  200

Irene S. Um is an academic researcher from University of Sydney. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pharmacy & Pharmacy practice. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 12 publications receiving 152 citations. Previous affiliations of Irene S. Um include Woolcock Institute of Medical Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumer perspectives about weight management services in a community pharmacy setting in NSW, Australia.

TL;DR: This work states that community pharmacists may be well placed to manage Australia’s obesity problem owing to their training, accessibility and trustworthiness, but determining consumers’ needs is vital to the development of any new services or the evaluation of existing services.
Journal ArticleDOI

Weight management in community pharmacy: what do the experts think?

TL;DR: Pharmacists are well-positioned to promote healthy weight and/or implement weight management interventions and some physical and financial barriers in providing these services were identified including infrastructure, pharmacists’ time and cost-effectiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing obesity in pharmacy: the Australian experience

TL;DR: Australian pharmacists believe there is a role for pharmacy in weight management, provided training in accredited programs is made available, and a holistic, evidence-based, multi-disciplinary service model has been identified as ideal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing and testing evidence-based weight management in Australian pharmacies: A Healthier Life Program

TL;DR: This study demonstrated that an evidence-based patient-centred weight management program can be implemented in Australian pharmacies and participants achieved targeted weight loss.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pharmacokinetic changes post-bariatric surgery: A scoping review.

TL;DR: This scoping review aimed to explore pharmacokinetic changes of orally administered drugs in patients post‐bariatric surgery, and assess the quality and level of bias, and found four studies were assessed as having fair quality while the remainder were of good quality and low risk of bias.