scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Iryna B. Dehtyarova

Bio: Iryna B. Dehtyarova is an academic researcher from Sumy State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tourism & Permission. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 7 publications receiving 54 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Melnyk et al. as mentioned in this paper studied the role and impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic stability of the country and identified the key factors that impact macro economic stability, which is described by the following variables: the growth rate of money supply, investment and openness of the economy.
Abstract: The main objective of this research is to study the role and impact of fiscal decentralization on the macroeconomic stability of the country. The paper analyzes and systematizes approaches to the definition of ‘macroeconomic stability’ concept. The key factors that impact macroeconomic stability are identified. In the framework of this research, the authors identify fiscal decentralization as one of the factors affecting macroeconomic stability. To determine the strength and statistical significance of the above mentioned relationship, the authors suggest presenting macroeconomic stability as a functional dependency between macroeconomic stability and the level of fiscal decentralization, which is described by the following variables: the growth rate of money supply, investment and openness of the economy, fiscal decentralization. In this case, it is suggested to determine the level of fiscal decentralization in three directions: expenditure decentralization, revenue decentralization and expenditure decentralization simultaneously. Leonid Melnyk (Ukraine), Lina Sineviciene (Lithuania), Oleksii Lyulyov (Ukraine), Tetyana Pimonenko (Ukraine), Iryna Dehtyarova (Ukraine) BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES LLC “СPС “Business Perspectives” Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10, Sumy, 40022, Ukraine www.businessperspectives.org FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY: THE EXPERIENCE OF UKRAINE’S ECONOMY Received on: 11th of October, 2017 Accepted on: 26th of November, 2017

32 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Melnyk et al. as mentioned in this paper studied the effect of industrial revolutions on the transformation of social and economic systems and found that industrial revolutions are a major factor in the success and failure of economic systems.
Abstract: ARTICLE INFO Leonid Melnyk, Oleksandr Kubatko, Iryna Dehtyarova, Oleksandr Matsenko and Oleksandr Rozhko (2019). The effect of industrial revolutions on the transformation of social and economic systems. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 381-391. doi:10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.31 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.31 RELEASED ON Friday, 27 December 2019 RECEIVED ON Friday, 11 October 2019 ACCEPTED ON Monday, 16 December 2019

30 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
11 Nov 2019
TL;DR: Melnyk et al. as mentioned in this paper analyzed key disruptive technologies which form the basis for the Internet of Things and revealed the concept of disruptive technologies as a phenomenon that opens a new cycle of productive forces development.
Abstract: The paper reveals the concept of disruptive technologies as a phenomenon that opens a new cycle of productive forces development. The paper shows essential disruptive technologies which have determined the change of socio-economic formations of human development: from agrarian societies to industrial and post-industrial ones. The authors of the article have analyzed key disruptive technologies which form the basis for the Internet of Things. Thus, it is stated that the innovations created on the basis of personal computers, mobile phones, Internet, Wi-Fi, renewable energy, 3D printers, digital technology, artificial intelligence, RFID tags, GPS, robots, and «cloud» technologies are the original components of the Internet of Things. A prognosis is that 37 billion devices will have been connected to the Internet of Things in the world by 2024. The paper demonstrates the economic view on disruptive technologies as a phenomenon that changes the benefit-cost ratio. The article reveals possible positive and negative effects of the implementation of disruptive technologies. The concept of the so called «the innovator’s dilemma» is discussed, and two principles of disruptive technologies are shown (creative, since it opens a new technological cycle, and destructive, since it undermines the production bases). The authors have empirically estimated the effects of key drivers that impact the average global GDP per capita. Thus, energy use, fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people), gross capital formation, improvements in life expectancy, and an increase in mobile cellular subscriptions are among the factors that increase the economic performance. ECONOMIC ANNALS-XXI ISSN 1728-6239 (Online) ISSN 1728-6220 (Print) https://doi.org/10.21003/ea http://www.soskin.info/ea/ Volume 179 Issue (9-10)’2019 Citation information: Melnyk, L., Dehtyarova, I., Kubatko, O., Karintseva, O., & Derykolenko, A. (2019). Disruptive technologies for the transition of digital economies towards sustainability. Economic Annals-XXI, 179(9-10), 22-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-02 UDC: 330.342:316.422.44:316.32(100) Leonid Melnyk D.Sc. (Economics), Professor, Head, Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration 2 Rymsky Korsakov Str., Sumy, 40007, Ukraine mealnyksumy@gmail.com ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-0678 Iryna Dehtyarova PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration 2 Rymsky Korsakov Str., Sumy, 40007, Ukraine i.dehtyarova@econ.sumdu.edu.ua ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-0437 Oleksandr Kubatko D.Sc. (Economics), Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration 2 Rymsky Korsakov Str., Sumy, 40007, Ukraine okubatko@econ.sumdu.edu.ua ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6396-5772 Oleksandra Karintseva D.Sc. (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration 2 Rymsky Korsakov Str., Sumy, 40007, Ukraine karintseva@econ.sumdu.edu.ua ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9570-3646 Anna Derykolenko PhD Student (Economics), Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration 2 Rymsky Korsakov Str., Sumy, 40007, Ukraine annysumy@ukr.net ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-5472 © Institute of Society Transformation, 2019

20 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The negative consequences of disruptive technologies are difficult to predict, and the authors in this article classified them in eight groups: psychological impact, information vulnerability, increasing information dependence, risk of creative potential reduction, increasing cost of waste in the green economy, loss of jobs, privacy decrease, hacking and the loss of human control over cyber systems.
Abstract: The size of the business intelligence market and its growth allows to estimate the short-term substitution effect, when the labour is replaced by artificial intelligence. Positive impacts of disruptive technologies include the dematerialisation of the industrial metabolism, and less ecological impact on nature, as prerequisites for the implementation of a circular economy. The negative consequences of disruptive technologies are difficult to predict, and the paper classifies them in eight groups: psychological impact; information vulnerability; increasing information dependence; the risk of creative potential reduction; the increasing cost of waste in the green economy; loss of jobs; privacy decrease; hacking and the loss of human control over cyber systems. The Internet of Things could not appear before the digital technologies (from a personal computer to 'cloud' technologies) reached industrial maturity. Also, societal, legislation and economic challenges raised by disruptive technologies for workers and firms are discussed.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyze the economic and social challenges of disruptive technologies in conditions of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0, and demonstrate how disruptive technologies will accelerate by 2025 and how both positive and negative impacts on business will grow up.
Abstract: The paper analyses the economic and social challenges of disruptive technologies in conditions of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0. The paper overviews research progress on Industry 4.0 and 5.0 and their influence on sustainable development. The research explains disruptive technologies trends for sustainable development. The paper examines the development process of “disruptive technologies”, which are numerous: telephone (replaced the telegraph), steamboats (replaced the sailing vessels), semiconductors (replaced the vacuum equipment), e-mail (instead of traditional mail), etc. The paper analyzes basic disruptive technologies for creating the Internet of Things. The paper shows potential economic characteristics of disruptive technologies for the nearest five-year perspective. It investigates the EU experience on the realization of Industries 4.0 and 5.0. The paper highlights the trends that positively impact business growth up to 2022 according to the EU Future of Jobs Report: increasing adoption of new technology and big data; advances in mobile internet; advances in artificial intelligence and cloud technology; shifts in national economic growth; expansion of education; advances in new energy supplies and technologies. The research demonstrates how disruptive technologies will accelerate by 2025 and how both positive and negative impacts on business will grow up. The article tackles the issues of the potential economic and social impact of disruptive technologies in the nearest future. It distinguishes possible consequences of the implementation of key disruptive technologies of our time: for example excessive psychological impact; the risk of creative potential reduction; increasing information dependence; reduced the privacy of personal life; risks of uncontrolled reduction of information security (for example, due to hackers); increased information vulnerability of civilization; risk of loss of human control over cyber systems, etc. Key words: economic challenges, social challenges, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, disruptive technology.

4 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a detailed analysis of the literature based on emerging themes was conducted with a focus on illuminating the path of circular economy implementation, which revealed that IoT and AI play a key role in the transition towards the circular economy transformation.

108 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the Japanese context of Society 5.0, which is based on a society-centered approach to take advantage of technological advances to finally solve the problems that currently threaten Japan, such as aging, birth rates and lack of competitiveness, among others.
Abstract: This document discusses the Japanese context of Society 5.0. Based on a society-centered approach, Society 5.0 seeks to take advantage of technological advances to finally solve the problems that currently threaten Japan, such as aging, birth rates and lack of competitiveness, among others. Additionally, another objective is to contribute to the progress of the country and develop the foundations for a better world, in which no individual can be excluded from the technological advances of our current society, to achieve this goal, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) have been developed. SDGs seek to assess the methods of use of modern technology and thus find the best strategies and tools to use it in a way that guarantees sustainability within the framework of a new society that demands constant renovations.

68 citations