scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Isabel Cabas

Bio: Isabel Cabas is an academic researcher from University of Murcia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Immune system & Estrogen receptor. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 31 publications receiving 721 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that EE(2) might alter the capacity of fish to appropriately respond to infection although it does not behave as an immunosuppressor.
Abstract: There is increasing public attention concerning the effect of endocrine disruptor chemicals (EDCs) on the immune system. One important group belonging to EDCs are the environmental estrogens. Commonly found in the effluents in wastewater treatment plants, 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE 2 ) which is used in contraceptive pills, is an endocrine disruptor with strong estrogenic effects. This study aims to investigate the capacity of EE 2 to modulate in vivo and in vitro the innate immune response of the gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata L.), a teleost species of great commercial value. For this purpose, adult specimens were bath-exposed to EE 2 (0, 5 and 50 ng/L) and then immunized with hemocyanin in the presence of the adjuvant aluminum. The results indicate that, after 15 days of EE 2 -exposure, the disruptor was able to inhibit in a dose-dependent manner the induction of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) gene expression, but did not significantly alter the specific antibody titer. To shed light on the role played by EE 2 into seabream immune response, leukocytes were exposed in vitro to several concentrations of EE 2 (0, 0.5, 5, 50 and 500 ng/ml) for 3, 16 and 48 h and the production of reactive oxygen intermediates, the phagocytic activity and the gene expression profile of these cells were analyzed. EE 2 was seen to inhibit both cellular activities and to alter the immune gene expression profile in primary macrophages. Thus, low concentrations of EE 2 increase the mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, tumour necrosis factor α and tumour growth factor β in non-activated macrophages. In contrast, EE 2 treatment of activated macrophages resulted in the decreased expression of pro-inflammatory genes and the increased expression of genes encoding anti-inflammatory and tissue remodeling/repair enzymes. Taken together, our results suggest that EE 2 might alter the capacity of fish to appropriately respond to infection although it does not behave as an immunosuppressor.

76 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated for the first time, to the knowledge, that estrogens are able to modulate vertebrate granulocyte functions through a GPER/cAMP/protein kinase A/CREB signaling pathway and could establish therapeutic targets for several immune disorders in which estrogens play a prominent role.
Abstract: Neutrophils are major participants in innate host responses. It is well known that estrogens have an immune-modulatory role, and some evidence exists that neutrophil physiology can be altered by these molecules. Traditionally, estrogens act via classical nuclear estrogen receptors, but the identification of a G protein–coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), a membrane estrogen receptor that binds estradiol and other estrogens, has opened up the possibility of exploring additional estrogen-mediated effects. However, information on the importance of GPER for immunity, especially, in neutrophils is scant. In this study, we report that gilthead seabream ( Sparus aurata L.) acidophilic granulocytes, which are the functional equivalent of mammalian neutrophils, express GPER at both mRNA and protein levels. By using a GPER selective agonist, G1, it was found that GPER activation in vitro slightly reduced the respiratory burst of acidophilic granulocytes and drastically altered the expression profile of several genes encoding major pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. In addition, GPER signaling in vivo modulated adaptive immunity. Finally, a cAMP analog mimicked the effects of G1 in the induction of the gene coding for PG-endoperoxide synthase 2 and in the induction of CREB phosphorylation, whereas pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase A superinduced PG-endoperoxide synthase 2. Taken together, our results demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that estrogens are able to modulate vertebrate granulocyte functions through a GPER/cAMP/protein kinase A/CREB signaling pathway and could establish therapeutic targets for several immune disorders in which estrogens play a prominent role.

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The effects of dietary intake of EE(2) on gilthead seabream, a marine hermaphrodite teleost, focusing on the immune events that take place in the gonad are reported, promoting a dose-dependent up-regulation of the expression of genes coding for cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules correlated with a leukocyte infiltration.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
09 Jan 2018-Biology
TL;DR: The aim of this manuscript is to review the present knowledge concerning the effect of sex steroid hormones and the presence of their receptors on fish leukocytes, taking into consideration that the studies performed vary as regard the fish species, doses, exposure protocols and hormones used.
Abstract: In vertebrates, in addition to their classically reproductive functions, steroids regulate the immune system. This action is possible mainly due to the presence of steroid receptors in the different immune cell types. Much evidence suggests that the immune system of fish is vulnerable to xenosteroids, which are ubiquitous in the aquatic environment. In vivo and in vitro assays have amply demonstrated that oestrogens interfere with both the innate and the adaptive immune system of fish by regulating the main leukocyte activities and transcriptional genes. They activate nuclear oestrogen receptors and/or G-protein coupled oestrogen receptor. Less understood is the role of androgens in the immune system, mainly due to the complexity of the transcriptional regulation of androgen receptors in fish. The aim of this manuscript is to review our present knowledge concerning the effect of sex steroid hormones and the presence of their receptors on fish leukocytes, taking into consideration that the studies performed vary as regard the fish species, doses, exposure protocols and hormones used. Moreover, we also include evidence of the probable role of progestins in the regulation of the immune system of fish.

39 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New insights are provided into plastic particles' effects on zebrafish larvae, improving the understanding of their environmental risks to the aquatic environment and changing the larvae swimming behavior when co-exposed with EE2.

425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the science regarding EE2, the concentration levels in the environment (water, sediment and biota) and summarize the effects of this compound on exposed biota at various concentrations, stage life, sex, and species.

422 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
University of Michigan1, Cornell University2, University of Pennsylvania3, University of Massachusetts Medical School4, University of Naples Federico II5, Baylor College of Medicine6, Spanish National Research Council7, Complutense University of Madrid8, New York University9, Boston Children's Hospital10, University of Rome Tor Vergata11, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital12, University of Pittsburgh13, French Institute of Health and Medical Research14, University of Paris15, National University of Cuyo16, Albert Einstein College of Medicine17, University of New Mexico18, Goethe University Frankfurt19, Weizmann Institute of Science20, University of Turku21, Sapienza University of Rome22, Virginia Commonwealth University23, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital24, Discovery Institute25, University of Copenhagen26, University of Tromsø27, Eötvös Loránd University28, Merck & Co.29, University of Freiburg30, Babraham Institute31, University of South Australia32, University of Adelaide33, University of Oviedo34, University of Chicago35, University of Graz36, National Institutes of Health37, Queens College38, City University of New York39, University of Tokyo40, University of Zurich41, Austrian Academy of Sciences42, University of British Columbia43, University of California, San Francisco44, Russian Academy of Sciences45, University Medical Center Groningen46, University of Cambridge47, University of Glasgow48, Rutgers University49, University of Padua50, Kazan Federal University51, University of Bern52, University of Oxford53, Oslo University Hospital54, University of Oslo55, University of Crete56, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas57, Francis Crick Institute58, Osaka University59, Harvard University60, Chinese Academy of Sciences61, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai62, Shanghai Jiao Tong University63, Karolinska Institutet64
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Abstract: Autophagy is a core molecular pathway for the preservation of cellular and organismal homeostasis. Pharmacological and genetic interventions impairing autophagy responses promote or aggravate disease in a plethora of experimental models. Consistently, mutations in autophagy-related processes cause severe human pathologies. Here, we review and discuss preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.

365 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Recent advances and current understanding of the role of GPER and the activity of clinically used drugs, such as SERMs and SERDs, in physiology and disease are discussed and novel opportunities for clinical development towards GPER-targeted therapeutics are highlighted.

317 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The history and characterization of GPER over the past 15 years is described, focusing on the pharmacology of steroidal and nonsteroidal compounds that have been employed to unravel the biology of this most recently recognized estrogen receptor.
Abstract: Estrogens are critical mediators of multiple and diverse physiologic effects throughout the body in both sexes, including the reproductive, cardiovascular, endocrine, nervous, and immune systems. As such, alterations in estrogen function play important roles in many diseases and pathophysiological conditions (including cancer), exemplified by the lower prevalence of many diseases in premenopausal women. Estrogens mediate their effects through multiple cellular receptors, including the nuclear receptor family (ERα and ERβ) and the G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) family (GPR30/G protein–coupled estrogen receptor [GPER]). Although both receptor families can initiate rapid cell signaling and transcriptional regulation, the nuclear receptors are traditionally associated with regulating gene expression, whereas GPCRs are recognized as mediating rapid cellular signaling. Estrogen-activated pathways are not only the target of multiple therapeutic agents (e.g., tamoxifen, fulvestrant, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors) but are also affected by a plethora of phyto- and xeno-estrogens (e.g., genistein, coumestrol, bisphenol A, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane). Because of the existence of multiple estrogen receptors with overlapping ligand specificities, expression patterns, and signaling pathways, the roles of the individual receptors with respect to the diverse array of endogenous and exogenous ligands have been challenging to ascertain. The identification of GPER-selective ligands however has led to a much greater understanding of the roles of this receptor in normal physiology and disease as well as its interactions with the classic estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ and their signaling pathways. In this review, we describe the history and characterization of GPER over the past 15 years focusing on the pharmacology of steroidal and nonsteroidal compounds that have been employed to unravel the biology of this most recently recognized estrogen receptor.

189 citations