scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Isabelle Soerjomataram

Other affiliations: Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bio: Isabelle Soerjomataram is an academic researcher from International Agency for Research on Cancer. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 166 publications receiving 83673 citations. Previous affiliations of Isabelle Soerjomataram include Erasmus University Rotterdam.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors found an increasing incidence among both males and females aged 40-49, with annual increases of 3.1% (95%CI: 1.21-5.03) and 2.5% (0.49-3.66), respectively, and an increase in older males (70+) of 0.61% (−1.47-1.14) and −0.68% (− 1.02-0.34), respectively.
Abstract: Uruguay has the highest colorectal cancer incidence rates in Latin America. Previous studies reported a stable incidence and a slight increase in mortality among males. We aimed to assess colorectal cancer incidence (2002–2017) and mortality trends (1990–2017) by age groups and sex, using data from the National Cancer Registry. Annual percent changes (APCs) were estimated using joinpoint regression models. We included 27,561 colorectal cancer cases and 25,403 deaths. We found an increasing incidence among both males and females aged 40–49, with annual increases of 3.1% (95%CI: 1.21–5.03) and 2.1% (95%CI: 0.49–3.66), respectively, and an increasein the rate in older males (70+) of 0.60% (95%CI: 0.02–1.20) per year between 2002 and 2017. Mortality remained stable among those younger than 50, whereas it decreased for older females aged 50–69 and 70+ (APC: −0.61% (−1.07–0.14) and −0.68% (−1.02–0.34), respectively), and increased for the oldest males (70+; APC: 0.74 (0.47–1.01)). In conclusion, we found rising colorectal cancer incidence accompanied by stable mortality in young adults. Sex disparities were also found among the older adults, with a more favorable pattern for females. Exposures to dietary and lifestyle risk factors, and inequalities in access to and awareness of screening programs, are probably among the main underlying causes and deserve further investigation.

2 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors used the New South Wales Cancer Registry (NSWCR) data to project mortality rates for colon and rectal cancers separately to 2040 in Australia.
Abstract: Previously published sub-site Australian projections for colon and rectal cancers to 2035 using the World Health Organization's mortality database sourced from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) predicted mortality rate decreases for colon cancer and increases for rectal cancer. There are complexities related to the interpretation of ABS's Australian colon and rectal cancer mortality rates, which could lead to possible inaccuracies in mortality rates for these sub-sites. The largest Australian population-wide registry, New South Wales Cancer Registry (NSWCR), compares routinely-reported causes of death with the recorded medical history from multiple data sources. Therefore, this study used the NSWCR data to project mortality rates for colon and rectal cancers separately to 2040 in Australia. The mortality rates for colon cancer are projected to continuously decline over the period 2015-2040, from 7.0 to 4.7 per 100,000 males, and from 5.3 to 3.2 per 100,000 females. Similar decreasing trends in mortality rates for rectal cancer were projected over the period 2015-2040, from 4.9 to 3.7 per 100,000 males, and from 2.6 to 2.3 per 100,000 females. These projections provide benchmark estimates for the colorectal cancer burden in Australia against which the effectiveness of cancer control interventions can be measured.

2 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Insufficient physical activity is associated to about 3000 cancer cases in France, a country with comparatively low but increasing prevalence of this risk factor, important for setting priorities in cancer prevention programmes aiming to increase physical activity in France and Europe in general.

2 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Norway, Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom, consistently had higher incidence of ovarian cancer compared to non-European countries, and the incidence trends revealed decreasing incidence trends of ovarian cancer in all countries evaluated.
Abstract: Background Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Historically, the incidence of ovarian cancer in Europe and North America had been higher compared to other regions of the world. Among European countries, the incidence of ovarian cancer has steadily declined over the years, nevertheless, countries in Europe continues to have the highest incidence of ovarian cancer. The aim of the study is to provide an overview of ovarian cancer incidence trends for high-income countries that are currently part of the Cancer Survival in High-Income Countries (SURVMARK-2) project. These countries include Norway, Denmark, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In addition, an age-period-cohort (APC) analysis was also conducted utilizing data from population-based cancer registries from these seven countries. Methods Ovarian cancer incidence rates were calculated using data from three sources, namely, SURVMARK-2, the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents database (CI5plus), and the European cancer registries (EUREG) database. The study contains all available years included in the databases until 2014, with Norway and Denmark having the longest study periods (1953–2014). The overall age-standardized incidence rates for ovarian cancer in women aged 20 and above were computed per year. SURVMARK-2 was utilized to calculate the incidence rates from 1995 to 2014. Incidence rates prior to 1995 were then derived from the CI5plus and the EUREG databases. Additionally, the estimated annual percent change (EAPC) between 1999 and 2013 was calculated for all women age 20 and above, women age 25–49 years and 50–74 years. Lastly, the data was grouped into 5-year age groups starting with 20–24 through 70–74 years, and APC analysis was performed to examine the effects of birth cohort and period. In addition, the goodness-of-fit of the models were assessed and the likelihood ratio test was used for APC model comparison. Results In general, Norway, Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom, consistently had higher incidence of ovarian cancer compared to non-European countries. Nevertheless, the incidence trends revealed decreasing incidence trends of ovarian cancer in all countries evaluated. Additionally, in the last 15-year period of the study, the overall incidence rate of ovarian cancer has generally been stable. Between 1999 and 2013 the highest decline of ovarian incidence rate was observed in Norway (EAPC: −1.9, 95% CI: −4.0, 0.4). Incidences of ovarian cancer in 25–49 years and 50–74 years age groups have also declined for most countries. Notably, among the age group 25–49 years, a statistically significant decline of ovarian cancer incidence rate was observed in Norway (EAPC: −4.2, 95% CI: −7.7, −0.6). In contrast, a modest increase of incidence rate in Canada (EAPC: 1.8, 95% CI: −2.2, 5.9) was observed in this age group. Moreover, the United Kingdom (EAPC: −1.8, 95% CI: −3.3, −0.3) had statistically significant decline of incidence rates among women 50–74 years. In addition, the APC analysis yielded the full APC model as the best fitting model for all countries. After adjusting for the period effect, a statistically significant cohort effect (P Conclusion In summary, a gradual decline of ovarian cancer was observed for all countries in the study. The birth cohort effect observed in the study may be linked to the changes in the prevalence of ovarian cancer risk factors, such as the use of oral contraceptive pill. In the other hand, the period effect observed may be explained partly by changes in disease classifications and cancer registry practices.

2 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions.
Abstract: This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions There will be an estimated 181 million new cancer cases (170 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 96 million cancer deaths (95 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018 In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (116% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (184% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (116%), prostate cancer (71%), and colorectal cancer (61%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (92%), stomach cancer (82%), and liver cancer (82%) for mortality Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality) Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31 © 2018 American Cancer Society

58,675 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as mentioned in this paper show that female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung cancer, colorectal (11 4.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%) and female breast (6.9%), and cervical cancer (5.6%) cancers.
Abstract: This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.

35,190 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A substantial portion of cancer cases and deaths could be prevented by broadly applying effective prevention measures, such as tobacco control, vaccination, and the use of early detection tests.
Abstract: Cancer constitutes an enormous burden on society in more and less economically developed countries alike. The occurrence of cancer is increasing because of the growth and aging of the population, as well as an increasing prevalence of established risk factors such as smoking, overweight, physical inactivity, and changing reproductive patterns associated with urbanization and economic development. Based on GLOBOCAN estimates, about 14.1 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million deaths occurred in 2012 worldwide. Over the years, the burden has shifted to less developed countries, which currently account for about 57% of cases and 65% of cancer deaths worldwide. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among males in both more and less developed countries, and has surpassed breast cancer as the leading cause of cancer death among females in more developed countries; breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among females in less developed countries. Other leading causes of cancer death in more developed countries include colorectal cancer among males and females and prostate cancer among males. In less developed countries, liver and stomach cancer among males and cervical cancer among females are also leading causes of cancer death. Although incidence rates for all cancers combined are nearly twice as high in more developed than in less developed countries in both males and females, mortality rates are only 8% to 15% higher in more developed countries. This disparity reflects regional differences in the mix of cancers, which is affected by risk factors and detection practices, and/or the availability of treatment. Risk factors associated with the leading causes of cancer death include tobacco use (lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer), overweight/obesity and physical inactivity (breast and colorectal cancer), and infection (liver, stomach, and cervical cancer). A substantial portion of cancer cases and deaths could be prevented by broadly applying effective prevention measures, such as tobacco control, vaccination, and the use of early detection tests.

23,203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data, available through 2015, were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data, available through 2016, were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, 1,762,450 new cancer cases and 606,880 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Over the past decade of data, the cancer incidence rate (2006-2015) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% per year in men, whereas the cancer death rate (2007-2016) declined annually by 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the racial gap in cancer mortality is slowly narrowing, socioeconomic inequalities are widening, with the most notable gaps for the most preventable cancers. For example, compared with the most affluent counties, mortality rates in the poorest counties were 2-fold higher for cervical cancer and 40% higher for male lung and liver cancers during 2012-2016. Some states are home to both the wealthiest and the poorest counties, suggesting the opportunity for more equitable dissemination of effective cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment strategies. A broader application of existing cancer control knowledge with an emphasis on disadvantaged groups would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer.

16,028 citations