scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Itay Meiri

Bio: Itay Meiri is an academic researcher from University of California, Los Angeles. The author has contributed to research in topics: Constraint satisfaction problem & Consistency (database systems). The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 9 publications receiving 2747 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the STP, which subsumes the major part of Vilain and Kautz's point algebra, can be solved in polynomial time and the applicability of path consistency algorithms as preprocessing of temporal problems is studied, to demonstrate their termination and bound their complexities.

1,989 citations

Proceedings Article
14 Jul 1991
TL;DR: In this article, a general model for temporal reasoning, capable of handling both qualitative and quantitative information, is presented, which allows the representation and processing of all types of constraints considered in the literature so far, including metric constraints, and qualitative, disjunctive, constraints (specifying the relative position between temporal objects).
Abstract: This paper presents a general model for temporal reasoning, capable of handling both qualitative and quantitative information. This model allows the representation and processing of all types of constraints considered in the literature so far, including metric constraints (restricting the distance between time points), and qualitative, disjunctive, constraints (specifying the relative position between temporal objects). Reasoning tasks in this unified framework are formulated as constraint satisfaction problems, and are solved by traditional constraint satisfaction techniques, such as backtracking and path consistency. A new class of tractable problems is characterized, involving qualitative networks augmented by quantitative domain constraints, some of which can be solved in polynomial time using arc and path consistency.

312 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A general model for temporal reasoning, capable of handling both qualitative and quantitative information, is presented, involving qualitative networks augmented by quantitative domain constraints, some of which can be solved in polynomial time using arc and path consistency.

199 citations

Proceedings Article
20 Aug 1989
TL;DR: The results show that directional arc-consistency, a scheme which embodies the simplest form of constraint recording, outperforms all other preprocessing techniques and the results of the second part of the experiment suggest that the best variable ordering is achieved by the fixed max-cardinality search order.
Abstract: This paper presents an evaluation of two orthogonal schemes for improving the efficiency of solving constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The first scheme involves a class of pre-processing techniques designed to make the representation of the CSP more explicit, including directional-arc-consistency, directional-path-consistency and adaptive-consistency. The second scheme aims at improving the order in which variables are chosen for evaluation during the search. In the first part of the experiment we tested the performance of backtracking (and its common enhancement - backjumping) with and without each of the preprocessings techniques above. The results show that directional arc-consistency, a scheme which embodies the simplest form of constraint recording, outperforms all other preprocessing techniques. The results of the second part of the experiment suggest that the best variable ordering is achieved by the fixed max-cardinality search order.

124 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An experimental evaluation of two orthogonal schemes for pre-processing constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) involves a class of local consistency techniques that includes directional arc consistency, directional path consistency, and adaptive consistency, which suggests that maximum cardinality and minimum width are the best preordering strategies.

103 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the STP, which subsumes the major part of Vilain and Kautz's point algebra, can be solved in polynomial time and the applicability of path consistency algorithms as preprocessing of temporal problems is studied, to demonstrate their termination and bound their complexities.

1,989 citations

Book
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: Rina Dechter synthesizes three decades of researchers work on constraint processing in AI, databases and programming languages, operations research, management science, and applied mathematics to provide the first comprehensive examination of the theory that underlies constraint processing algorithms.
Abstract: Constraint satisfaction is a simple but powerful tool. Constraints identify the impossible and reduce the realm of possibilities to effectively focus on the possible, allowing for a natural declarative formulation of what must be satisfied, without expressing how. The field of constraint reasoning has matured over the last three decades with contributions from a diverse community of researchers in artificial intelligence, databases and programming languages, operations research, management science, and applied mathematics. Today, constraint problems are used to model cognitive tasks in vision, language comprehension, default reasoning, diagnosis, scheduling, temporal and spatial reasoning. In Constraint Processing, Rina Dechter, synthesizes these contributions, along with her own significant work, to provide the first comprehensive examination of the theory that underlies constraint processing algorithms. Throughout, she focuses on fundamental tools and principles, emphasizing the representation and analysis of algorithms. ·Examines the basic practical aspects of each topic and then tackles more advanced issues, including current research challenges ·Builds the reader's understanding with definitions, examples, theory, algorithms and complexity analysis ·Synthesizes three decades of researchers work on constraint processing in AI, databases and programming languages, operations research, management science, and applied mathematics Table of Contents Preface; Introduction; Constraint Networks; Consistency-Enforcing Algorithms: Constraint Propagation; Directional Consistency; General Search Strategies; General Search Strategies: Look-Back; Local Search Algorithms; Advanced Consistency Methods; Tree-Decomposition Methods; Hybrid of Search and Inference: Time-Space Trade-offs; Tractable Constraint Languages; Temporal Constraint Networks; Constraint Optimization; Probabilistic Networks; Constraint Logic Programming; Bibliography

1,739 citations

Book
30 Aug 2001

1,709 citations

Book
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Researchers from other fields should find in this handbook an effective way to learn about constraint programming and to possibly use some of the constraint programming concepts and techniques in their work, thus providing a means for a fruitful cross-fertilization among different research areas.
Abstract: Constraint programming is a powerful paradigm for solving combinatorial search problems that draws on a wide range of techniques from artificial intelligence, computer science, databases, programming languages, and operations research. Constraint programming is currently applied with success to many domains, such as scheduling, planning, vehicle routing, configuration, networks, and bioinformatics. The aim of this handbook is to capture the full breadth and depth of the constraint programming field and to be encyclopedic in its scope and coverage. While there are several excellent books on constraint programming, such books necessarily focus on the main notions and techniques and cannot cover also extensions, applications, and languages. The handbook gives a reasonably complete coverage of all these lines of work, based on constraint programming, so that a reader can have a rather precise idea of the whole field and its potential. Of course each line of work is dealt with in a survey-like style, where some details may be neglected in favor of coverage. However, the extensive bibliography of each chapter will help the interested readers to find suitable sources for the missing details. Each chapter of the handbook is intended to be a self-contained survey of a topic, and is written by one or more authors who are leading researchers in the area. The intended audience of the handbook is researchers, graduate students, higher-year undergraduates and practitioners who wish to learn about the state-of-the-art in constraint programming. No prior knowledge about the field is necessary to be able to read the chapters and gather useful knowledge. Researchers from other fields should find in this handbook an effective way to learn about constraint programming and to possibly use some of the constraint programming concepts and techniques in their work, thus providing a means for a fruitful cross-fertilization among different research areas. The handbook is organized in two parts. The first part covers the basic foundations of constraint programming, including the history, the notion of constraint propagation, basic search methods, global constraints, tractability and computational complexity, and important issues in modeling a problem as a constraint problem. The second part covers constraint languages and solver, several useful extensions to the basic framework (such as interval constraints, structured domains, and distributed CSPs), and successful application areas for constraint programming. - Covers the whole field of constraint programming - Survey-style chapters - Five chapters on applications Table of Contents Foreword (Ugo Montanari) Part I : Foundations Chapter 1. Introduction (Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, Toby Walsh) Chapter 2. Constraint Satisfaction: An Emerging Paradigm (Eugene C. Freuder, Alan K. Mackworth) Chapter 3. Constraint Propagation (Christian Bessiere) Chapter 4. Backtracking Search Algorithms (Peter van Beek) Chapter 5. Local Search Methods (Holger H. Hoos, Edward Tsang) Chapter 6. Global Constraints (Willem-Jan van Hoeve, Irit Katriel) Chapter 7. Tractable Structures for CSPs (Rina Dechter) Chapter 8. The Complexity of Constraint Languages (David Cohen, Peter Jeavons) Chapter 9. Soft Constraints (Pedro Meseguer, Francesca Rossi, Thomas Schiex) Chapter 10. Symmetry in Constraint Programming (Ian P. Gent, Karen E. Petrie, Jean-Francois Puget) Chapter 11. Modelling (Barbara M. Smith) Part II : Extensions, Languages, and Applications Chapter 12. Constraint Logic Programming (Kim Marriott, Peter J. Stuckey, Mark Wallace) Chapter 13. Constraints in Procedural and Concurrent Languages (Thom Fruehwirth, Laurent Michel, Christian Schulte) Chapter 14. Finite Domain Constraint Programming Systems (Christian Schulte, Mats Carlsson) Chapter 15. Operations Research Methods in Constraint Programming (John Hooker) Chapter 16. Continuous and Interval Constraints(Frederic Benhamou, Laurent Granvilliers) Chapter 17. Constraints over Structured Domains (Carmen Gervet) Chapter 18. Randomness and Structure (Carla Gomes, Toby Walsh) Chapter 19. Temporal CSPs (Manolis Koubarakis) Chapter 20. Distributed Constraint Programming (Boi Faltings) Chapter 21. Uncertainty and Change (Kenneth N. Brown, Ian Miguel) Chapter 22. Constraint-Based Scheduling and Planning (Philippe Baptiste, Philippe Laborie, Claude Le Pape, Wim Nuijten) Chapter 23. Vehicle Routing (Philip Kilby, Paul Shaw) Chapter 24. Configuration (Ulrich Junker) Chapter 25. Constraint Applications in Networks (Helmut Simonis) Chapter 26. Bioinformatics and Constraints (Rolf Backofen, David Gilbert)

1,527 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: PDDL2.1 as discussed by the authors is a modelling language capable of expressing temporal and numeric properties of planning domains and has been used in the International Planning Competitions (IPC) since 1998.
Abstract: In recent years research in the planning community has moved increasingly towards application of planners to realistic problems involving both time and many types of resources. For example, interest in planning demonstrated by the space research community has inspired work in observation scheduling, planetary rover exploration and spacecraft control domains. Other temporal and resource-intensive domains including logistics planning, plant control and manufacturing have also helped to focus the community on the modelling and reasoning issues that must be confronted to make planning technology meet the challenges of application. The International Planning Competitions have acted as an important motivating force behind the progress that has been made in planning since 1998. The third competition (held in 2002) set the planning community the challenge of handling time and numeric resources. This necessitated the development of a modelling language capable of expressing temporal and numeric properties of planning domains. In this paper we describe the language, PDDL2.1, that was used in the competition. We describe the syntax of the language, its formal semantics and the validation of concurrent plans. We observe that PDDL2.1 has considerable modelling power -- exceeding the capabilities of current planning technology -- and presents a number of important challenges to the research community.

1,420 citations