scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Ivar Ekeland

Bio: Ivar Ekeland is an academic researcher from Paris Dauphine University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hamiltonian system & Nonlinear system. The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 204 publications receiving 17282 citations. Previous affiliations of Ivar Ekeland include University of British Columbia & University of Paris.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider non-convex variational problems with a priori estimate in convex programming and show that they can be solved by the minimax theorem.
Abstract: Preface to the classics edition Preface Part I. Fundamentals of Convex Analysis. I. Convex functions 2. Minimization of convex functions and variational inequalities 3. Duality in convex optimization Part II. Duality and Convex Variational Problems. 4. Applications of duality to the calculus of variations (I) 5. Applications of duality to the calculus of variations (II) 6. Duality by the minimax theorem 7. Other applications of duality Part III. Relaxation and Non-Convex Variational Problems. 8. Existence of solutions for variational problems 9. Relaxation of non-convex variational problems (I) 10. Relaxation of non-convex variational problems (II) Appendix I. An a priori estimate in non-convex programming Appendix II. Non-convex optimization problems depending on a parameter Comments Bibliography Index.

4,434 citations

Book
01 Jan 1984

2,202 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Ivar Ekeland1
TL;DR: The variational principle states that if a differentiable function F has a finite lower bound (although it need not attain it), then, for every E > 0, there exists some point u( where 11 F'(uJj* < l, i.e., its derivative can be made arbitrarily small as discussed by the authors.

2,105 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that the set of continuous linear functionals on a Banach space E which attain their maximum on a prescribed closed convex bounded subset X c E is norm-dense in £ *.
Abstract: I. The central result. The grandfather of it all is the celebrated 1961 theorem of Bishop and Phelps (see [7], [8]) that the set of continuous linear functionals on a Banach space E which attain their maximum on a prescribed closed convex bounded subset X c E is norm-dense in £*. The crux of the proof lies in introducing a certain convex cone in E, associating with it a partial ordering, and applying to the latter a transfinite induction argument (Zorn's lemma). This argument was later used in different settings by Brondsted and Rockafellar (see [9]) and by F. Browder (see [11]). The various situations can be adequately summarized in a diagram:

901 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

08 Dec 2001-BMJ
TL;DR: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one, which seems an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality.
Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

33,785 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a fully specified model of long-run growth in which knowledge is assumed to be an input in production that has increasing marginal productivity, which is essentially a competitive equilibrium model with endogenous technological change.
Abstract: This paper presents a fully specified model of long-run growth in which knowledge is assumed to be an input in production that has increasing marginal productivity. It is essentially a competitive equilibrium model with endogenous technological change. In contrast to models based on diminishing returns, growth rates can be increasing over time, the effects of small disturbances can be amplified by the actions of private agents, and large countries may always grow faster than small countries. Long-run evidence is offered in support of the empirical relevance of these possibilities.

18,200 citations

Book
02 Jan 2013
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a detailed description of the basic properties of optimal transport, including cyclical monotonicity and Kantorovich duality, and three examples of coupling techniques.
Abstract: Couplings and changes of variables.- Three examples of coupling techniques.- The founding fathers of optimal transport.- Qualitative description of optimal transport.- Basic properties.- Cyclical monotonicity and Kantorovich duality.- The Wasserstein distances.- Displacement interpolation.- The Monge-Mather shortening principle.- Solution of the Monge problem I: global approach.- Solution of the Monge problem II: Local approach.- The Jacobian equation.- Smoothness.- Qualitative picture.- Optimal transport and Riemannian geometry.- Ricci curvature.- Otto calculus.- Displacement convexity I.- Displacement convexity II.- Volume control.- Density control and local regularity.- Infinitesimal displacement convexity.- Isoperimetric-type inequalities.- Concentration inequalities.- Gradient flows I.- Gradient flows II: Qualitative properties.- Gradient flows III: Functional inequalities.- Synthetic treatment of Ricci curvature.- Analytic and synthetic points of view.- Convergence of metric-measure spaces.- Stability of optimal transport.- Weak Ricci curvature bounds I: Definition and Stability.- Weak Ricci curvature bounds II: Geometric and analytic properties.

5,524 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: A Treatise on the Family by G. S. Becker as discussed by the authors is one of the most famous and influential economists of the second half of the 20th century, a fervent contributor to and expounder of the University of Chicago free-market philosophy, and winner of the 1992 Nobel Prize in economics.
Abstract: A Treatise on the Family. G. S. Becker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1981. Gary Becker is one of the most famous and influential economists of the second half of the 20th century, a fervent contributor to and expounder of the University of Chicago free-market philosophy, and winner of the 1992 Nobel Prize in economics. Although any book with the word "treatise" in its title is clearly intended to have an impact, one coming from someone as brilliant and controversial as Becker certainly had such a lofty goal. It has received many article-length reviews in several disciplines (Ben-Porath, 1982; Bergmann, 1995; Foster, 1993; Hannan, 1982), which is one measure of its scholarly importance, and yet its impact is, I think, less than it may have initially appeared, especially for scholars with substantive interests in the family. This book is, its title notwithstanding, more about economics and the economic approach to behavior than about the family. In the first sentence of the preface, Becker writes "In this book, I develop an economic or rational choice approach to the family." Lest anyone accuse him of focusing on traditional (i.e., material) economics topics, such as family income, poverty, and labor supply, he immediately emphasizes that those topics are not his focus. "My intent is more ambitious: to analyze marriage, births, divorce, division of labor in households, prestige, and other non-material behavior with the tools and framework developed for material behavior." Indeed, the book includes chapters on many of these issues. One chapter examines the principles of the efficient division of labor in households, three analyze marriage and divorce, three analyze various child-related issues (fertility and intergenerational mobility), and others focus on broader family issues, such as intrafamily resource allocation. His analysis is not, he believes, constrained by time or place. His intention is "to present a comprehensive analysis that is applicable, at least in part, to families in the past as well as the present, in primitive as well as modern societies, and in Eastern as well as Western cultures." His tone is profoundly conservative and utterly skeptical of any constructive role for government programs. There is a clear sense of how much better things were in the old days of a genderbased division of labor and low market-work rates for married women. Indeed, Becker is ready and able to show in Chapter 2 that such a state of affairs was efficient and induced not by market or societal discrimination (although he allows that it might exist) but by small underlying household productivity differences that arise primarily from what he refers to as "complementarities" between caring for young children while carrying another to term. Most family scholars would probably find that an unconvincingly simple explanation for a profound and complex phenomenon. What, then, is the salient contribution of Treatise on the Family? It is not literally the idea that economics could be applied to the nonmarket sector and to family life because Becker had already established that with considerable success and influence. At its core, microeconomics is simple, characterized by a belief in the importance of prices and markets, the role of self-interested or rational behavior, and, somewhat less centrally, the stability of preferences. It was Becker's singular and invaluable contribution to appreciate that the behaviors potentially amenable to the economic approach were not limited to phenomenon with explicit monetary prices and formal markets. Indeed, during the late 1950s and throughout the 1960s, he did undeniably important and pioneering work extending the domain of economics to such topics as labor market discrimination, fertility, crime, human capital, household production, and the allocation of time. Nor is Becker's contribution the detailed analyses themselves. Many of them are, frankly, odd, idiosyncratic, and off-putting. …

4,817 citations