J.-C. Schwartz

Bio: J.-C. Schwartz is an academic researcher from French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The author has contributed to research in topics: Histamine & Histamine H3 receptor. The author has an hindex of 69, co-authored 242 publications receiving 15422 citations. Previous affiliations of J.-C. Schwartz include Paris Descartes University.

Formation and inactivation of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide in central neurons.

Abstract: Anandamide (N-arachidonoyl-ethanolamine) was recently identified as a brain arachidonate derivative that binds to and activates cannabinoid receptors, yet the mechanisms underlying formation, release and inactivation of this putative messenger molecule are still unclear. Here we report that anandamide is produced in and released from cultured brain neurons in a calcium ion-dependent manner when the neurons are stimulated with membrane-depolarizing agents. Anandamide formation occurs through phosphodiesterase-mediated cleavage of a novel phospholipid precursor, N-arachidonoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine. A similar mechanism also governs the formation of a family of anandamide congeners, whose possible roles in neuronal signalling remain unknown. Our results and those of others indicate therefore that multiple biochemical pathways may participate in anandamide formation in brain tissue. The life span of extracellular anandamide is limited by a rapid and selective process of cellular uptake, which is accompanied by hydrolytic degradation to ethanolamine and arachidonate. Our results thus strongly support the proposed role of anandamide as an endogenous neuronal messenger.

High-affinity enkephalin-degrading peptidase in brain is increased after morphine

Abstract: CONSIDERABLE evidence now exists to suggest that the endogenous opioid pentapeptides Met-enkephalin (Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met) and Leu-enkephalin (Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Leu) function as neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. A correlate of this hypothesis is that a specific inactivation mechanism must operate in the vicinity of opiate receptors to turn off rapidly the enkephalin signal. Indeed recent studies have shown that the pentapeptides are subject to extremely rapid inactivation in various tissues, occurring primarily by cleavage of the Tyr–Gly amide bond1–5. This feature accounts for the short-lasting biological activity of these peptides, contrasting with the potent activity of synthetic analogues such as (D-Ala2)-Met-enkephalinamide in which this bond is protected6. However, many tissues including brain contain a spectrum of peptidases with low specificities and affinities7 and no evidence has been yet provided for the involvement of a specific enzyme in the regulation of enkephalinergic transmission. We now report the presence of a high-affinity peptidase in a particulate fraction of mouse striatum splitting the Leu-enkephalin molecule with release of a tripeptide fragment (Tyr-Gly-Gly) and exhibiting definite substrate specificity. The marked and selective increase in the activity of this peptidase in the striatum of mice chronically treated with morphine suggests that it might be associated with enkephalinergic transmission.

Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function

Abstract: Missale, Cristina, S. Russel Nash, Susan W. Robinson, Mohamed Jaber, and Marc G. Caron. Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function. Physiol. Rev. 78: 189–225, 1998. — The diverse physiological actions of dopamine are mediated by at least five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1 and D5) couple to the G protein Gs and activate adenylyl cyclase. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2 , D3 , and D4) and are prototypic of G protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels. The genes for the D1 and D5 receptors are intronless, but pseudogenes of the D5 exist. The D2 and D3 receptors vary in certain tissues and species as a result of alternative splicing, and the human D4 receptor gene exhibits extensive polymorphic variation. In the central nervous system, dopamine receptors are widely expressed because they are involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, emotion, and affect as well as neuroendocrine s...

International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin).

Abstract: It is evident that in the last decade or so, a vast amount of new information has become available concerning the various 5-HT receptor types and their characteristics. This derives from two main research approaches, operational pharmacology, using selective ligands (both agonists and antagonists), and, more recently, molecular biology. Although the scientific community continues to deliberate about the hierarchy of criteria for neurotransmitter receptor characterisation, there seems good agreement between the two approaches regarding 5-HT receptor classification. In addition, the information regarding transduction mechanisms and second messengers is also entirely consistent. Thus, on the basis of these essential criteria for receptor characterisation and classification, there are at least three main groups or classes of 5-HT receptor: 5-HT1, 5-HT2, and 5-HT3. Each group is not only operationally but also structurally distinct, with each receptor group having its own distinct transducing system. The more recently identified 5-HT4 receptor almost undoubtedly represents a fourth 5-HT receptor class on the basis of operational and transductional data, but this will only be definitively shown when the cDNA for the receptor has been cloned and the amino acid sequence of the protein is known. Although those 5-HT receptors that have been fully characterised and classified to date (and, hence, named with confidence) would seem to mediate the majority of the actions of 5-HT throughout the mammalian body, not all receptors for 5-HT are fully encompassed within our scheme of classification. These apparent anomalies must be recognised and need further study. They may or may not represent new groups of 5-HT receptor or subtypes of already known groups of 5-HT receptor. Even though the cDNAs for the 5-ht1E, 5-ht1F, 5-ht5, 5-ht6, and 5-ht7 receptors have been cloned and their amino acid sequence defined, more data are necessary concerning their operational and transductional characteristics before one can be confident of the suitability of their appellations. Therefore, it is important to rationalise in concert all of the available data from studies involving both operational approaches of the classical pharmacological type and those from molecular and cellular biology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction

Abstract: The theory is advanced that the common denominator of a wide range of addictive substances is their ability to cause psychomotor activation. This view is related to the theory that all positive reinforcers activate a common biological mechanism associated with approach behaviors and that this mechanism has as one of its components dopaminergic fibers that project up the medial forebrain bundle from the midbrain to limbic and cortical regions. Evidence is reviewed that links both the reinforcing and locomotor-stimulating effects of both the psychomotor stimulants and the opiates to this brain mechanism. It is suggested that nicotine, caffeine, barbiturates, alcohol, benzodiazepines, cannabis, and phencyclidine----each ofwhich also has psychomotor stimulant actions--may activate the docaminergic fibers or their output circuitry. The role of physical dependence in addiction is suggested to vary from drug to drug and to be of secondary importance in the understanding of compulsive drug self-administration. Attempts at a general theory of addiction are attempts to isr late--from a variety of irrelevant actionsmthose drug actions that are responsible for habitual, compulsive, nonmedical drug self-administration. The common assumption of addiction theorists is that general principles of addiction can be learned from the study of one drug and that these principles will have heuristic value for the study of other drugs. Thus far, attempts at a general theory of addiction have failed to isolate common actions that can account for addiction across the range of major drug classes. A major stumbling block has been the psychomotor stimulants--amph etamine and cocainemwhich do not readily fit models traditionally based on depressant drug classes. The present article offers a new attempt at a general theory of addiction. It differs from earlier theories (e.g., Collier, 1968; Himmelsbach, 1943; Jaffe & Sharpless, 1968; Jellinek, 1960; Kalant, 1977; Lindsmith, 1947; Solomon & Corbit, 1974) in that it is based on the common denominator of the psychomotor stimulants---amphetamine, cocaine, and related drugs---rather than on the common denominator of the socalled depressant drugs~opiates, barbiturates, alcohol, and others. We take up two topics before presenting the new theory. First, we briefly discuss the heuristic value of a biological approach and suggest that the biologist's distinction between homology and analogy offers a useful insight. Next we discuss the shortcomings of earlier theories--variants of dependence theory. Then we outline the new theory and review the relevant evidence for its three major assertions: (a) that all addictive drugs have psychomotor stimulant actions, (b) that the stimulant actions of these different drugs have a shared biological mechanism, and (c) that the biological mechanism of these stimulant