scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "J. H. J. de Bruijne published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
R. L. Smart1, L. M. Sarro2, Jan Rybizki3, Céline Reylé4  +455 moreInstitutions (82)
TL;DR: In this paper, a clean and well-characterised catalogue of objects within 100 pc of the Sun from the Gaia Early Data Release 3 is presented, which contains at least 92% of stars of stellar type M9 within 100pc of the sun.
Abstract: Aims. We produce a clean and well-characterised catalogue of objects within 100 pc of the Sun from the Gaia Early Data Release 3. We characterise the catalogue through comparisons to the full data release, external catalogues, and simulations. We carry out a first analysis of the science that is possible with this sample to demonstrate its potential and best practices for its use.Methods. Theselection of objects within 100 pc from the full catalogue used selected training sets, machine-learning procedures, astrometric quantities, and solution quality indicators to determine a probability that the astrometric solution is reliable. The training set construction exploited the astrometric data, quality flags, and external photometry. For all candidates we calculated distance posterior probability densities using Bayesian procedures and mock catalogues to define priors. Any object with reliable astrometry and a non-zero probability of being within 100 pc is included in the catalogue.Results. We have produced a catalogue of 331 312 objects that we estimate contains at least 92% of stars of stellar type M9 within 100 pc of the Sun. We estimate that 9% of the stars in this catalogue probably lie outside 100 pc, but when the distance probability function is used, a correct treatment of this contamination is possible. We produced luminosity functions with a high signal-to-noise ratio for the main-sequence stars, giants, and white dwarfs. We examined in detail the Hyades cluster, the white dwarf population, and wide-binary systems and produced candidate lists for all three samples. We detected local manifestations of several streams, superclusters, and halo objects, in which we identified 12 members of Gaia Enceladus. We present the first direct parallaxes of five objects in multiple systems within 10 pc of the Sun.Conclusions. We provide the community with a large, well-characterised catalogue of objects in the solar neighbourhood. This is a primary benchmark for measuring and understanding fundamental parameters and descriptive functions in astronomy.

137 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
Xavier Luri1, Laurent Chemin2, Gisella Clementini3, H. E. Delgado4  +452 moreInstitutions (83)
Abstract: Context. This work is part of the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium papers published with the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3). It is one of the demonstration papers aiming to highlight the improvements and quality of the newly published data by applying them to a scientific case.Aims. We use the Gaia EDR3 data to study the structure and kinematics of the Magellanic Clouds. The large distance to the Clouds is a challenge for the Gaia astrometry. The Clouds lie at the very limits of the usability of the Gaia data, which makes the Clouds an excellent case study for evaluating the quality and properties of the Gaia data.Methods. The basis of our work are two samples selected to provide a representation as clean as possible of the stars of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). The selection used criteria based on position, parallax, and proper motions to remove foreground contamination from the Milky Way, and allowed the separation of the stars of both Clouds. From these two samples we defined a series of subsamples based on cuts in the colour-magnitude diagram; these subsamples were used to select stars in a common evolutionary phase and can also be used as approximate proxies of a selection by age.Results. We compared the Gaia Data Release 2 and Gaia EDR3 performances in the study of the Magellanic Clouds and show the clear improvements in precision and accuracy in the new release. We also show that the systematics still present in the data make the determination of the 3D geometry of the LMC a difficult endeavour; this is at the very limit of the usefulness of the Gaia EDR3 astrometry, but it may become feasible with the use of additional external data. We derive radial and tangential velocity maps and global profiles for the LMC for the several subsamples we defined. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the two planar components of the ordered and random motions are derived for multiple stellar evolutionary phases in a galactic disc outside the Milky Way, showing the differences between younger and older phases. We also analyse the spatial structure and motions in the central region, the bar, and the disc, providing new insightsinto features and kinematics. Finally, we show that the Gaia EDR3 data allows clearly resolving the Magellanic Bridge, and we trace the density and velocity flow of the stars from the SMC towards the LMC not only globally, but also separately for young and evolved populations. This allows us to confirm an evolved population in the Bridge that is slightly shift from the younger population. Additionally, we were able to study the outskirts of both Magellanic Clouds, in which we detected some well-known features and indications of new ones.

64 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Teresa Antoja, Paul J. McMillan1, G. Kordopatis, P. Ramos2  +450 moreInstitutions (81)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the data from the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) to select different populations and components and to calculate the distances and velocities in the direction of the anticentre.
Abstract: Aims. We aim to demonstrate the scientific potential of the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) for the study of different aspects of the Milky Way structure and evolution and we provide, at the same time, a description of several practical aspects of the data and examples of their usage. Methods. We used astrometric positions, proper motions, parallaxes, and photometry from EDR3 to select different populations and components and to calculate the distances and velocities in the direction of the anticentre. In this direction, the Gaia astrometric data alone enable the calculation of the vertical and azimuthal velocities; also, the extinction is relatively low compared to other directions in the Galactic plane. We then explore the disturbances of the current disc, the spatial and kinematical distributions of early accreted versus in situ stars, the structures in the outer parts of the disc, and the orbits of open clusters Berkeley 29 and Saurer 1. Results. With the improved astrometry and photometry of EDR3, we find that: (i) the dynamics of the Galactic disc are very complex with oscillations in the median rotation and vertical velocities as a function of radius, vertical asymmetries, and new correlations, including a bimodality with disc stars with large angular momentum moving vertically upwards from below the plane, and disc stars with slightly lower angular momentum moving preferentially downwards; (ii) we resolve the kinematic substructure (diagonal ridges) in the outer parts of the disc for the first time; (iii) the red sequence that has been associated with the proto-Galactic disc that was present at the time of the merger with Gaia -Enceladus-Sausage is currently radially concentrated up to around 14 kpc, while the blue sequence that has been associated with debris of the satellite extends beyond that; (iv) there are density structures in the outer disc, both above and below the plane, most probably related to Monoceros, the Anticentre Stream, and TriAnd, for which the Gaia data allow an exhaustive selection of candidate member stars and dynamical study; and (v) the open clusters Berkeley 29 and Saurer 1, despite being located at large distances from the Galactic centre, are on nearly circular disc-like orbits. Conclusions. Even with our simple preliminary exploration of the Gaia EDR3, we demonstrate how, once again, these data from the European Space Agency are crucial for our understanding of the different pieces of our Galaxy and their connection to its global structure and history.

52 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) for the study of the Milky Way structure and evolution, including the disturbances of the current disc, the spatial and kinematical distributions of early accreted versus in-situ stars, the structures in the outer parts of the disc, and the orbits of open clusters Berkeley 29 and Saurer 1.
Abstract: We aim to demonstrate the scientific potential of the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) for the study of the Milky Way structure and evolution. We used astrometric positions, proper motions, parallaxes, and photometry from EDR3 to select different populations and components and to calculate the distances and velocities in the direction of the anticentre. We explore the disturbances of the current disc, the spatial and kinematical distributions of early accreted versus in-situ stars, the structures in the outer parts of the disc, and the orbits of open clusters Berkeley 29 and Saurer 1. We find that: i) the dynamics of the Galactic disc are very complex with vertical asymmetries, and new correlations, including a bimodality with disc stars with large angular momentum moving vertically upwards from below the plane, and disc stars with slightly lower angular momentum moving preferentially downwards; ii) we resolve the kinematic substructure (diagonal ridges) in the outer parts of the disc for the first time; iii) the red sequence that has been associated with the proto-Galactic disc that was present at the time of the merger with Gaia-Enceladus-Sausage is currently radially concentrated up to around 14 kpc, while the blue sequence that has been associated with debris of the satellite extends beyond that; iv) there are density structures in the outer disc, both above and below the plane, most probably related to Monoceros, the Anticentre Stream, and TriAnd, for which the Gaia data allow an exhaustive selection of candidate member stars and dynamical study; and v) the open clusters Berkeley~29 and Saurer~1, despite being located at large distances from the Galactic centre, are on nearly circular disc-like orbits. We demonstrate how, once again, the Gaia are crucial for our understanding of the different pieces of our Galaxy and their connection to its global structure and history.

44 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Simon Hodgkin1, D. L. Harrison1, Elmé Breedt1, Thomas Wevers1, Thomas Wevers2, Guy Rixon1, A. Delgado1, A. Yoldas1, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska3, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska4, Łukasz Wyrzykowski5, M. van Leeuwen1, N. Blagorodnova6, H. Campbell7, D. Eappachen6, D. Eappachen4, Morgan Fraser8, N. Ihanec5, Sergey E. Koposov9, Sergey E. Koposov1, K. Kruszyńska5, Gábor Marton10, Krzysztof A. Rybicki5, A. G. A. Brown3, P. Burgess1, G. Busso1, S. Cowell1, F. De Angeli1, C. Diener1, D. W. Evans1, Gerry Gilmore1, G. Holland1, Peter G. Jonker4, Peter G. Jonker6, F. van Leeuwen1, Francois Mignard11, P. Osborne1, Jordi Portell12, Timo Prusti13, P. J. Richards14, M. Riello1, George M. Seabroke15, N. A. Walton1, P. Ábrahám10, P. Ábrahám16, G. Altavilla17, G. Altavilla18, S. G. Baker15, Ulrich Bastian19, P. T. O'Brien20, J. H. J. de Bruijne13, Timothy Butterley21, J. M. Carrasco12, J. Castañeda12, J. S. Clark22, Gisella Clementini18, Chris M. Copperwheat23, Mark Cropper15, Goran Damljanović, Michael Davidson9, Christopher J. Davis24, Michel Dennefeld25, V. S. Dhillon26, V. S. Dhillon27, C. Dolding15, Martin Dominik28, P. Esquej, L. Eyer29, Claus Fabricius12, M. Fridman30, M. Fridman31, Dirk Froebrich32, N. Garralda12, A. Gomboc31, J. J. González-Vidal12, Raphael Guerra, Nigel Hambly9, L. K. Hardy26, B. Holl29, A. Hourihane1, J. Japelj33, David Alexander Kann27, Cs. Kiss10, Christian Knigge34, Ulrich Kolb22, S. Komossa35, Ágnes Kóspál10, Ágnes Kóspál35, Ágnes Kóspál16, G. Kovács36, Mária Kun10, Giuseppe Leto18, Fraser Lewis23, Fraser Lewis37, S. P. Littlefair26, A. A. Mahabal38, Carole Mundell39, Z. Nagy10, D. Padeletti40, L. Palaversa29, Andrzej Pigulski41, M. L. Pretorius, W. van Reeven, Valério A. R. M. Ribeiro6, Valério A. R. M. Ribeiro42, Maroussia Roelens29, Nicholas Rowell9, N. Schartel, Alexander Scholz28, Axel Schwope43, Brigitta Sipőcz36, S. J. Smartt44, Michael D. Smith32, I. Serraller12, Danny Steeghs45, Mark Sullivan34, Laszlo Szabados10, E. Szegedi-Elek10, P. Tisserand25, L. Tomasella18, S. van Velzen3, Patricia A. Whitelock46, Richard Wilson21, D. R. Young44 
TL;DR: Hodgkin et al. as mentioned in this paper presented an open-access version of their paper, which is available for free under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Full list of authors: Hodgkin, S. T.; Harrison, D. L.; Breedt, E.; Wevers, T.; Rixon, G.; Delgado, A.; Yoldas, A.; Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; van Leeuwen, M.; Blagorodnova, N.; Campbell, H.; Eappachen, D.; Fraser, M.; Ihanec, N.; Koposov, S. E.; Kruszynska, K.; Marton, G.; Rybicki, K. A.; Brown, A. G. A.; Burgess, P. W.; Busso, G.; Cowell, S.; De Angeli, F.; Diener, C.; Evans, D. W.; Gilmore, G.; Holland, G.; Jonker, P. G.; van Leeuwen, F.; Mignard, F.; Osborne, P. J.; Portell, J.; Prusti, T.; Richards, P. J.; Riello, M.; Seabroke, G. M.; Walton, N. A.; Abraham, P.; Altavilla, G.; Baker, S. G.; Bastian, U.; O'Brien, P.; de Bruijne, J.; Butterley, T.; Carrasco, J. M.; Castaneda, J.; Clark, J. S.; Clementini, G.; Copperwheat, C. M.; Cropper, M.; Damljanovic, G.; Davidson, M.; Davis, C. J.; Dennefeld, M.; Dhillon, V. S.; Dolding, C.; Dominik, M.; Esquej, P.; Eyer, L.; Fabricius, C.; Fridman, M.; Froebrich, D.; Garralda, N.; Gomboc, A.; Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.; Guerra, R.; Hambly, N. C.; Hardy, L. K.; Holl, B.; Hourihane, A.; Japelj, J.; Kann, D. A.; Kiss, C.; Knigge, C.; Kolb, U.; Komossa, S.; Kospal, A.; Kovacs, G.; Kun, M.; Leto, G.; Lewis, F.; Littlefair, S. P.; Mahabal, A. A.; Mundell, C. G.; Nagy, Z.; Padeletti, D.; Palaversa, L.; Pigulski, A.; Pretorius, M. L.; van Reeven, W.; Ribeiro, V. A. R. M.; Roelens, M.; Rowell, N.; Schartel, N.; Scholz, A.; Schwope, A.; Sipőcz, B. M.; Smartt, S. J.; Smith, M. D.; Serraller, I.; Steeghs, D.; Sullivan, M.; Szabados, L.; Szegedi-Elek, E.; Tisserand, P.; Tomasella, L.; van Velzen, S.; Whitelock, P. A.; Wilson, R. W.; Young, D. R.-- This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

36 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the vector field of proper motions in vector spherical harmonics (VSH) fit and various versions of the VSH fit and compared to get the most consistent result and a realistic estimate of its uncertainty.
Abstract: Context. Gaia Early Data Release 3 ( Gaia EDR3) provides accurate astrometry for about 1.6 million compact (QSO-like) extragalactic sources, 1.2 million of which have the best-quality five-parameter astrometric solutions. Aims. The proper motions of QSO-like sources are used to reveal a systematic pattern due to the acceleration of the solar systembarycentre with respect to the rest frame of the Universe. Apart from being an important scientific result by itself, the acceleration measured in this way is a good quality indicator of the Gaia astrometric solution. Methods. Theeffect of the acceleration was obtained as a part of the general expansion of the vector field of proper motions in vector spherical harmonics (VSH). Various versions of the VSH fit and various subsets of the sources were tried and compared to get the most consistent result and a realistic estimate of its uncertainty. Additional tests with the Gaia astrometric solution were used to get a better idea of the possible systematic errors in the estimate. Results. Our best estimate of the acceleration based on Gaia EDR3 is (2.32 ± 0.16) × 10 −10 m s −2 (or 7.33 ±0.51 km s −1 Myr−1) towards α = 269.1° ± 5.4°, δ = −31.6° ± 4.1°, corresponding to a proper motion amplitude of 5.05 ±0.35 μ as yr −1 . This is in good agreement with the acceleration expected from current models of the Galactic gravitational potential. We expect that future Gaia data releases will provide estimates of the acceleration with uncertainties substantially below 0.1 μ as yr −1 .

35 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
S. T. Hodgkin, D. L. Harrison, Elmé Breedt, Thomas Wevers, Guy Rixon, Antonio Delgado, A. Yoldas, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Łukasz Wyrzykowski, M. van Leeuwen, N. Blagorodnova, H. Campbell, D. Eappachen, Morgan Fraser, N. Ihanec, Sergey E. Koposov, K. Kruszyńska, Gábor Marton, K. A. Rybicki, A. G. A. Brown, Paul W. Burgess, G. Busso, S. Cowell, F. De Angeli, C. Diener, D. W. Evans, Gerry Gilmore, G. Holland, P.G. Jonker, F.E. van Leeuwen, Francois Mignard, P. Osborne, Jordi Portell, Timo Prusti, P. J. Richards, M. Riello, George M. Seabroke, N. A. Walton, Péter Ábrahám, G. Altavilla, S. G. Baker, Ulrich Bastian, P. T. O'Brien, J. H. J. de Bruijne, Timothy Butterley, J. M. Carrasco, J. Castañeda, J. S. Clark, G. Clementini, Chris M. Copperwheat, Mark Cropper, Goran Damljanović, Michael Davidson, Christopher J. Davis, Michel Dennefeld, V. S. Dhillon, C. Dolding, Martin Dominik, P. Esquej, L. Eyer, Claus Fabricius, M. Fridman, Dirk Froebrich, N. Garralda, A. Gomboc, J.J. González-Vidal, Raphael Guerra, Nigel Hambly, L. K. Hardy, B. Holl, A. Hourihane, J. Japelj, David Alexander Kann, Cs. Kiss, Christian Knigge, Ulrich Kolb, S. Komossa, Ágnes Kóspál, G. Kovács, Mária Kun, Giuseppe Leto, Fraser Lewis, S. P. Littlefair, A. A. Mahabal, Carole Mundell, Z. Nagy, D. Padeletti, L. Palaversa, Andrzej Pigulski, M. L. Pretorius, W. van Reeven, Valério A. R. M. Ribeiro, Maroussia Roelens, Nicholas Rowell, N. Schartel, Alexander Scholz, Axel Schwope, Brigitta Sipőcz, S. J. Smartt, Michael D. Smith, I. Serraller, Danny Steeghs, Mark Sullivan, László Szabados, E. Szegedi-Elek, P. Tisserand, L. Tomasella, S. van Velzen, Patricia A. Whitelock, Richard Wilson, D. R. Young 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission, processed by the Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC), processed by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the \gaia\ multilateral agreement.
Abstract: This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission \gaia\ (\url{https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia}), processed by the \gaia\ Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, \url{https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium}). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the \gaia\ Multilateral Agreement. Further details of funding authorities and individuals contributing to the success of the mission is shown at \url{https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GEDR3/Miscellaneous/sec_acknowl/}. We thank the United Kingdom Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (PPARC), the United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), and the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA) through the following grants to the University of Bristol, the University of Cambridge, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Leicester, the Mullard Space Sciences Laboratory of University College London, and the United Kingdom Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL): PP/D006511/1, PP/D006546/1, PP/D006570/1, ST/I000852/1, ST/J005045/1, ST/K00056X/1, ST/K000209/1, ST/K000756/1, ST/L006561/1, ST/N000595/1, ST/S000623/1, ST/N000641/1, ST/N000978/1, ST/N001117/1, ST/S000089/1, ST/S000976/1, ST/S001123/1, ST/S001948/1, ST/S002103/1, and ST/V000969/1. This paper made use of the Whole Sky Database (WSDB) created by Sergey Koposov and maintained at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge with financial support from the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) and the European Research Council (ERC). We thank the William Herschel and Isaac Newton Telescopes on the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory, La Palma, Spain, as well as the Optical Infrared Coordination Network for Astronomy (OPTICON) for their support of this project through telescope time, especially during the commissioning and verification phases. We thank the Copernico 1.82m telescope (Mt. Ekar, Asiago Italy) operated by INAF Padova for supporting the project through telescope time (under the Large Programme Tomasella-SNe) during the verification phases. We acknowledge observations taken as part of the PESSTO project collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programme 199.D-0143. Authors at the ICCUB were supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and University (MICIU/FEDER, UE) through grant RTI2018-095076-B-C21, and the Institute of Cosmos Sciences University of Barcelona (ICCUB, Unidad de Excelencia ’Mar\'{\i}a de Maeztu’) through grant CEX2019-000918-M. This work is supported by Polish NCN grants: Daina No. 2017/27/L/ST9/03221, Harmonia No. 2018/30/M/ST9/00311, Preludium No. 2017/25/N/ST9/01253 and MNiSW grant DIR/WK/2018/12 as well as the European Commission's Horizon2020 OPTICON grant No. 730890. The Authors would like to thank the Warsaw University OGLE project for their continuous support in this work. AB acknowledges financial support from the Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA). AG acknowledges the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (grants P1-0031, I0-0033, J1-8136, J1-2460). AH was funded in part by the Leverhulme Trust through grant RPG-2012-541 and by the European Research Council grant 320360. AP acknowledges support from the NCN grant No.~2016/21/B/ST9/01126. CM acknowledges support from Jim and Hiroko Sherwin. DAK acknowledges support from the Spanish research projects AYA 2014-58381-P, AYA2017-89384-P, from Juan de la Cierva Incorporaci\'on fellowship IJCI-2015-26153, and from Spanish National Research Project RTI2018-098104-J-I00 (GRBPhot). EB and STH are funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council grant ST/S000623/1. TW was funded in part by European Research Council grant 320360 and by European Commission grant 730980. GC acknowledges the Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) for its continuing support through contract 2018-24-HH.0 to the Italian Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF). GD acknowledges the observing grant support from the Institute of Astronomy and Rozhen NAO BAS through the bilateral joint research project "Gaia Celestial Reference Frame (CRF) and fast variable astronomical objects" (during 2020-2022, leader is G.Damljanovic), and support by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (contract No 451-03-68/2020-14/200002). G. Marton acknowledges support from the EC Horizon 2020 project OPTICON (730890) and the ESA PRODEX contract nr. 4000129910. MF is supported by a Royal Society - Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship NB acknowledges support from the research programme VENI, with project number 016.192.277, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). NI is partially supported by Polish NCN DAINA grant No. 2017/27/L/ST9/03221. PAW acknowledges research funding from the South African National Research Foundation. RWW was funded by the Science and Technology Facilities Council grant ST/P000541/1. V.A.R.M.R.\ acknowledges financial support from Radboud Excellence Initiative, the Funda\c{c}\~{a}o para a Ci\^encia e a Tecnologia (FCT) in the form of an exploratory project of reference IF/00498/2015/CP1302/CT0001, FCT and the Minist\'erio da Ci\^encia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES) through national funds and when applicable co-funded EU funds under the project UIDB/EEA/50008/2020, and supported by Enabling Green E-science for the Square Kilometre Array Research Infrastructure (ENGAGE-SKA), POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022217, and PHOBOS, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029932, funded by Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionaliza\c{c}\~ao (COMPETE 2020) and FCT, Portugal. ZKR acknowledges funding from the Netherlands Research School for Astronomy (NOVA). ZN acknowledges support from the ESA PRODEX contract nr. 4000129910.

32 citations


F.E. van Leeuwen, J. H. J. de Bruijne, Carine Babusiaux, J. Castañeda, David Hobbs, G. Busso, P. Sartoretti, E. Utrilla, Xavier Luri, P. M. Marrese, A. Mora, Claus Fabricius, J. González-Núñez, Nigel Hambly, G. Altavilla, M. Altmann, Teresa Antoja, Frédéric Arenou, Joost M. Bakker, Eduardo Balbinot, Christophe Barache, Ulrich Bastian, N. Bauchet, M. Bellazzini, M. Biermann, R. Blomme, Alex Bombrun, A. G. A. Brown, Deborah Busonero, A. G. Butkevich, Carla Cacciari, J. M. Carrasco, N. Cheek, M. Clotet, O. L. Creevey, C. Crowley, Hector Canovas, Mario David, Michael Davidson, F. De Angeli, S. Diakite, R. Drimmel, J. Durán, D. W. Evans, M. Fabrizio, J. Fernández-Hernández, Francesca Figueras, K. Findeisen, A. Garcia-Gutierrez, G. Gracia-Abril, Raphael Guerra, R. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Amina Helmi, M. Henar Sarmiento, Jonay I. González Hernández, A. Hutton, Carme Jordi, Sanjeev Khanna, Sergei A. Klioner, Uwe Lammers, N. Leclerc, Lennart Lindegren, W. Löffler, S. Marinoni, J. M. Martín-Fleitas, Eduard Masana, A. Masip Vela, A. Masip, R. Messineo, Daniel Michalik, Francois Mignard, Paolo Montegriffo, Tatiana Muraveva, Krzysztof Nienartowicz, E. Pancino, C. Panem, Jordi Portell, E. Racero, M. Rainer, P. Ramos, Céline Reylé, C. Ríos Diaz, Alberto Riva, Annie C. Robin, T. Roegiers, M. Romero-Gómez, Nicholas Rowell, Jan Rybizki, Jesus Salgado, Nicoletta Sanna, George M. Seabroke, J. C. Segovia, H. Siddiqui, R. L. Smart, C.A. Stephenson, D. Teyssier, F. Torra, C. Turon, J. Valero, Antonella Vallenari, M. van Leeuwen, M. Weiler 
01 Mar 2021

1 citations