This essential reference for graduate students and researchers provides a unified treatment of earthquakes and faulting as two aspects of brittle tectonics at different timescales. The intimate connection between the two is manifested in their scaling laws and populations, which evolve from fracture growth and interactions between fractures. The connection between faults and the seismicity generated is governed by the rate and state dependent friction laws - producing distinctive seismic styles of faulting and a gamut of earthquake phenomena including aftershocks, afterslip, earthquake triggering, and slow slip events. The third edition of this classic treatise presents a wealth of new topics and new observations. These include slow earthquake phenomena; friction of phyllosilicates, and at high sliding velocities; fault structures; relative roles of strong and seismogenic versus weak and creeping faults; dynamic triggering of earthquakes; oceanic earthquakes; megathrust earthquakes in subduction zones; deep earthquakes; and new observations of earthquake precursory phenomena.

The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

On robust estimation of the location parameter

A global plate motion model, named NUVEL-1, which describes current plate motions between 12 rigid plates is described, with special attention given to the method, data, and assumptions used Tectonic implications of the patterns that emerged from the results are discussed It is shown that wide plate boundary zones can form not only within the continental lithosphere but also within the oceanic lithosphere; eg, between the Indian and Australian plates and between the North American and South American plates Results of the model also suggest small but significant diffuse deformation of the oceanic lithosphere, which may be confined to small awkwardly shaped salients of major plates

Current plate motions

SUMMARY 
We determine best-fitting Euler vectors, closure-fitting Euler vectors, and a new global model (NUVEL-1) describing the geologically current motion between 12 assumed-rigid plates by inverting plate motion data we have compiled, critically analysed, and tested for self-consistency. We treat Arabia, India and Australia, and North America and South America as distinct plates, but combine Nubia and Somalia into a single African plate because motion between them could not be reliably resolved. The 1122 data from 22 plate boundaries inverted to obtain NUVEL-1 consist of 277 spreading rates, 121 transform fault azimuths, and 724 earthquake slip vectors. We determined all rates over a uniform time interval of 3.0m.y., corresponding to the centre of the anomaly 2A sequence, by comparing synthetic magnetic anomalies with observed profiles. The model fits the data well. Unlike prior global plate motion models, which systematically misfit some spreading rates in the Indian Ocean by 8–12mm yr−1, the systematic misfits by NUVEL-1 nowhere exceed ∼3 mm yr−1. The model differs significantly from prior global plate motion models. For the 30 pairs of plates sharing a common boundary, 29 of 30 P071, and 25 of 30 RM2 Euler vectors lie outside the 99 per cent confidence limits of NUVEL-1. Differences are large in the Indian Ocean where NUVEL-1 plate motion data and plate geometry differ from those used in prior studies and in the Pacific Ocean where NUVEL-1 rates are systematically 5–20 mm yr−1 slower than those of prior models. The strikes of transform faults mapped with GLORIA and Seabeam along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge greatly improve the accuracy of estimates of the direction of plate motion. These data give Euler vectors differing significantly from those of prior studies, show that motion about the Azores triple junction is consistent with plate circuit closure, and better resolve motion between North America and South America. Motion of the Caribbean plate relative to North or South America is about 7 mm yr−1 slower than in prior global models. Trench slip vectors tend to be systematically misfit wherever convergence is oblique, and best-fitting poles determined only from trench slip vectors differ significantly from their corresponding closure-fitting Euler vectors. The direction of slip in trench earthquakes tends to be between the direction of plate motion and the normal to the trench strike. Part of this bias may be due to the neglect of lateral heterogeneities of seismic velocities caused by cold subducting slabs, but the larger part is likely caused by independent motion of fore-arc crust and lithosphere relative to the overriding plate.

Summary The kinematic understanding of the relationship between relative plate motion and the structure of orogenic belts depends upon a knowledge of relative plate motion across the plate boundary system, the relative motion of small blocks and flakes within the system, an evaluation of orogenic body forces, and an understanding of the thermomechanical evolution of the upper part of the orogenic lithosphere in determining strength and detachment levels. We have built a preliminary model for the Cenozoic kinematic evolution of the western Mediterranean oceanic basins and their peripheral orogens that integrates (1) the motion of Africa relative to Europe based upon a new study of Atlantic fracture zones using SEASAT data and the Lamont-Doherty magnetic anomaly database, (2) a new interpretation of the rotation of Corsica/Sardinia and the opening of the Balearic and Tyrrhenian oceanic basins, (3) sedimentary facies sequences in the Apennines, Calabria, and Sicily, and (4) Apennine/Calabrian structure and structural sequence.

Kinematics of the western Mediterranean

The westward drift is one of the most well known features of the geomagnetic field. In this paper we come back to the apparent drift of the main field as seen at the Earth's surface, and show that there is no evidence for a body drift but rather clear evidence for a latitude-dependent drift. Computing the fluid flow at the core mantle boundary (CMB), in the frozen flux and geostrophic hypothesis, we also obtain, among other components, a clear differential zonal rotation of the fluid, symmetrical with respect to the Equator. This differential rotation changes with time, with a time constant of the order of 10 years. Dynamic considerations lead us to think that, during such a time interval, the change in the zonal toroidal flow inside the core consists of motions in which axial cylindrical annuli rotate rigidly about the Earth's axis of rotation. Then, for the 1969–85 time-span, the change in the core angular momentum is shown to balance the change in the mantle angular momentum.

Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle

A major preoccupation in physical sciences has been to interpret macroscopic events from microscopic phenomena. In some cases the change of scale is efficient and fairly easy to perform, but in others it turns out to be difficult and uninteresting. Success or failure is due more to the nature of the events than to the efficiency of the theoretical methods used. Some macroscopic phenomena have their origin in a microscopic organization which can be transferred to larger scales whereas others attain their structure on the macroscopic scale itself. Thus before applying scaling laws techniques1–4 one must ensure that embedded scales are suggested by physical observations. That this seems to be the case for the fracture of rocks is supported by geological, seismological and rock mechanics observations. We have therefore built a very simple model based on scaling laws which yields a criterion for fragility at different scales and views rupture as a critical point. We use this model here to outline a general approach to earthquake prediction.

Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction

A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field

In studies of the temporal variations of the main internal geomagnetic field (the secular variation or SV), it is usual to consider separately the variations of the dipolar and non-dipolar parts which appear to have different time constants. The mechanism that is generally invoked to explain the generation of SV is the advection of the lines of force of the main field by the highly conducting fluid at the top of the core. Such a mechanism involves the main field as a whole and it is not clear a priori why its two parts should behave separately. I show here that the Coriolis force will probably dominate the force budget at the top of the core and that, in such a case, the motion of the fluid involves the two parts of the field in a different way; in particular, the existing axial dipolar component is not re-engaged in the process which builds up the SV.

J. L. Le Mouël

Papers

Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle

Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction

A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field

Outer-core geostrophic flow and secular variation of Earth's geomagnetic field

Motions at core surface in the geostrophic approximation