scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

J.M. McCool

Bio: J.M. McCool is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Adaptive filter & Method of steepest descent. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 2 publications receiving 1673 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Aug 1976
TL;DR: It is shown that for stationary inputs the LMS adaptive algorithm, based on the method of steepest descent, approaches the theoretical limit of efficiency in terms of misadjustment and speed of adaptation when the eigenvalues of the input correlation matrix are equal or close in value.
Abstract: This paper describes the performance characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter, a digital filter composed of a tapped delay line and adjustable weights, whose impulse response is controlled by an adaptive algorithm. For stationary stochastic inputs, the mean-square error, the difference between the filter output and an externally supplied input called the "desired response," is a quadratic function of the weights, a paraboloid with a single fixed minimum point that can be sought by gradient techniques. The gradient estimation process is shown to introduce noise into the weight vector that is proportional to the speed of adaptation and number of weights. The effect of this noise is expressed in terms of a dimensionless quantity "misadjustment" that is a measure of the deviation from optimal Wiener performance. Analysis of a simple nonstationary case, in which the minimum point of the error surface is moving according to an assumed first-order Markov process, shows that an additional contribution to misadjustment arises from "lag" of the adaptive process in tracking the moving minimum point. This contribution, which is additive, is proportional to the number of weights but inversely proportional to the speed of adaptation. The sum of the misadjustments can be minimized by choosing the speed of adaptation to make equal the two contributions. It is further shown, in Appendix A, that for stationary inputs the LMS adaptive algorithm, based on the method of steepest descent, approaches the theoretical limit of efficiency in terms of misadjustment and speed of adaptation when the eigenvalues of the input correlation matrix are equal or close in value. When the eigenvalues are highly disparate (λ max /λ min > 10), an algorithm similar to LMS but based on Newton's method would approach this theoretical limit very closely.

1,423 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper compares the performance characteristics of three algorithms useful in adjusting the parameters of adaptive systems: the differential (DSD) and least-mean-square (LMS) algorithms, both based on the method of steepest descent, and the linear random search (LRS) algorithm, based on a random search procedure derived from the Darwinian concept of "natural selection.
Abstract: This paper compares the performance characteristics of three algorithms useful in adjusting the parameters of adaptive systems: the differential (DSD) and least-mean-square (LMS) algorithms, both based on the method of steepest descent, and the linear random search (LRS) algorithm, based on a random search procedure derived from the Darwinian concept of "natural selection." The LRS algorithm is presented here for the first time. Analytical expressions are developed that define the relationship between rate of adaptation and "misadjustment," a dimensionless measure of the difference between actual and optimal performance due to noise in the adaptive process. For a fixed rate of adaptation it is shown that the LMS algorithm, which is the most efficient, has a misadjustment proportional to the number of adaptive parameters, while the DSD and LRS algorithms have misadjustments proportional to the square of the number of adaptive parameters. The expressions developed are verified by computer simulations that demonstrate the application of the three algorithms to system modeling problems, of the LMS algorithm to the cancelling of broadband interference in the sidelobes of a receiving antenna array, and of the DSD and LRS algorithms to the phase control of a transmitting antenna array. The second application introduces a new method of constrained adaptive beamforming whose performance is not significantly affected by element nonuniformity. The third application represents a class of problems to which the LMS algorithm in the basic form described in this paper is not applicable.

280 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: The author explains the development of the Huffman Coding Algorithm and some of the techniques used in its implementation, as well as some of its applications, including Image Compression, which is based on the JBIG standard.
Abstract: Preface 1 Introduction 1.1 Compression Techniques 1.1.1 Lossless Compression 1.1.2 Lossy Compression 1.1.3 Measures of Performance 1.2 Modeling and Coding 1.3 Organization of This Book 1.4 Summary 1.5 Projects and Problems 2 Mathematical Preliminaries 2.1 Overview 2.2 A Brief Introduction to Information Theory 2.3 Models 2.3.1 Physical Models 2.3.2 Probability Models 2.3.3. Markov Models 2.3.4 Summary 2.5 Projects and Problems 3 Huffman Coding 3.1 Overview 3.2 "Good" Codes 3.3. The Huffman Coding Algorithm 3.3.1 Minimum Variance Huffman Codes 3.3.2 Length of Huffman Codes 3.3.3 Extended Huffman Codes 3.4 Nonbinary Huffman Codes 3.5 Adaptive Huffman Coding 3.5.1 Update Procedure 3.5.2 Encoding Procedure 3.5.3 Decoding Procedure 3.6 Applications of Huffman Coding 3.6.1 Lossless Image Compression 3.6.2 Text Compression 3.6.3 Audio Compression 3.7 Summary 3.8 Projects and Problems 4 Arithmetic Coding 4.1 Overview 4.2 Introduction 4.3 Coding a Sequence 4.3.1 Generating a Tag 4.3.2 Deciphering the Tag 4.4 Generating a Binary Code 4.4.1 Uniqueness and Efficiency of the Arithmetic Code 4.4.2 Algorithm Implementation 4.4.3 Integer Implementation 4.5 Comparison of Huffman and Arithmetic Coding 4.6 Applications 4.6.1 Bi-Level Image Compression-The JBIG Standard 4.6.2 Image Compression 4.7 Summary 4.8 Projects and Problems 5 Dictionary Techniques 5.1 Overview 5.2 Introduction 5.3 Static Dictionary 5.3.1 Diagram Coding 5.4 Adaptive Dictionary 5.4.1 The LZ77 Approach 5.4.2 The LZ78 Approach 5.5 Applications 5.5.1 File Compression-UNIX COMPRESS 5.5.2 Image Compression-the Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) 5.5.3 Compression over Modems-V.42 bis 5.6 Summary 5.7 Projects and Problems 6 Lossless Image Compression 6.1 Overview 6.2 Introduction 6.3 Facsimile Encoding 6.3.1 Run-Length Coding 6.3.2 CCITT Group 3 and 4-Recommendations T.4 and T.6 6.3.3 Comparison of MH, MR, MMR, and JBIG 6.4 Progressive Image Transmission 6.5 Other Image Compression Approaches 6.5.1 Linear Prediction Models 6.5.2 Context Models 6.5.3 Multiresolution Models 6.5.4 Modeling Prediction Errors 6.6 Summary 6.7 Projects and Problems 7 Mathematical Preliminaries 7.1 Overview 7.2 Introduction 7.3 Distortion Criteria 7.3.1 The Human Visual System 7.3.2 Auditory Perception 7.4 Information Theory Revisted 7.4.1 Conditional Entropy 7.4.2 Average Mutual Information 7.4.3 Differential Entropy 7.5 Rate Distortion Theory 7.6 Models 7.6.1 Probability Models 7.6.2 Linear System Models 7.6.3 Physical Models 7.7 Summary 7.8 Projects and Problems 8 Scalar Quantization 8.1 Overview 8.2 Introduction 8.3 The Quantization Problem 8.4 Uniform Quantizer 8.5 Adaptive Quantization 8.5.1 Forward Adaptive Quantization 8.5.2 Backward Adaptive Quantization 8.6 Nonuniform Quantization 8.6.1 pdf-Optimized Quantization 8.6.2 Companded Quantization 8.7 Entropy-Coded Quantization 8.7.1 Entropy Coding of Lloyd-Max Quantizer Outputs 8.7.2 Entropy-Constrained Quantization 8.7.3 High-Rate Optimum Quantization 8.8 Summary 8.9 Projects and Problems 9 Vector Quantization 9.1 Overview 9.2 Introduction 9.3 Advantages of Vector Quantization over Scalar Quantization 9.4 The Linde-Buzo-Gray Algorithm 9.4.1 Initializing the LBG Algorithm 9.4.2 The Empty Cell Problem 9.4.3 Use of LBG for Image Compression 9.5 Tree-Structured Vector Quantizers 9.5.1 Design of Tree-Structured Vector Quantizers 9.6 Structured Vector Quantizers 9.6.1 Pyramid Vector Quantization 9.6.2 Polar and Spherical Vector Quantizers 9.6.3 Lattice Vector Quantizers 9.7 Variations on the Theme 9.7.1 Gain-Shape Vector Quantization 9.7.2 Mean-Removed Vector Quantization 9.7.3 Classified Vector Quantization 9.7.4 Multistage Vector Quantization 9.7.5 Adaptive Vector Quantization 9.8 Summary 9.9 Projects and Problems 10 Differential Encoding 10.1 Overview 10.2 Introduction 10.3 The Basic Algorithm 10.4 Prediction in DPCM 10.5 Adaptive DPCM (ADPCM) 10.5.1 Adaptive Quantization in DPCM 10.5.2 Adaptive Prediction in DPCM 10.6 Delta Modulation 10.6.1 Constant Factor Adaptive Delta Modulation (CFDM) 10.6.2 Continuously Variable Slope Delta Modulation 10.7 Speech Coding 10.7.1 G.726 10.8 Summary 10.9 Projects and Problems 11 Subband Coding 11.1 Overview 11.2 Introduction 11.3 The Frequency Domain and Filtering 11.3.1 Filters 11.4 The Basic Subband Coding Algorithm 11.4.1 Bit Allocation 11.5 Application to Speech Coding-G.722 11.6 Application to Audio Coding-MPEG Audio 11.7 Application to Image Compression 11.7.1 Decomposing an Image 11.7.2 Coding the Subbands 11.8 Wavelets 11.8.1 Families of Wavelets 11.8.2 Wavelets and Image Compression 11.9 Summary 11.10 Projects and Problems 12 Transform Coding 12.1 Overview 12.2 Introduction 12.3 The Transform 12.4 Transforms of Interest 12.4.1 Karhunen-Loeve Transform 12.4.2 Discrete Cosine Transform 12.4.3 Discrete Sine Transform 12.4.4 Discrete Walsh-Hadamard Transform 12.5 Quantization and Coding of Transform Coefficients 12.6 Application to Image Compression-JPEG 12.6.1 The Transform 12.6.2 Quantization 12.6.3 Coding 12.7 Application to Audio Compression 12.8 Summary 12.9 Projects and Problems 13 Analysis/Synthesis Schemes 13.1 Overview 13.2 Introduction 13.3 Speech Compression 13.3.1 The Channel Vocoder 13.3.2 The Linear Predictive Coder (Gov.Std.LPC-10) 13.3.3 Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) 13.3.4 Sinusoidal Coders 13.4 Image Compression 13.4.1 Fractal Compression 13.5 Summary 13.6 Projects and Problems 14 Video Compression 14.1 Overview 14.2 Introduction 14.3 Motion Compensation 14.4 Video Signal Representation 14.5 Algorithms for Videoconferencing and Videophones 14.5.1 ITU_T Recommendation H.261 14.5.2 Model-Based Coding 14.6 Asymmetric Applications 14.6.1 The MPEG Video Standard 14.7 Packet Video 14.7.1 ATM Networks 14.7.2 Compression Issues in ATM Networks 14.7.3 Compression Algorithms for Packet Video 14.8 Summary 14.9 Projects and Problems A Probability and Random Processes A.1 Probability A.2 Random Variables A.3 Distribution Functions A.4 Expectation A.5 Types of Distribution A.6 Stochastic Process A.7 Projects and Problems B A Brief Review of Matrix Concepts B.1 A Matrix B.2 Matrix Operations C Codes for Facsimile Encoding D The Root Lattices Bibliography Index

2,311 citations

Book
30 Nov 1993
TL;DR: Details of Element Pattern and Mutual Impedance Effects for Phased Arrays and Special Array Feeds for Limited Field of View and Wideband Arrays are presented.
Abstract: Phased Arrays in Radar and Communication Systems. Pattern Characteristics and Synthesis of Linear and Planar Arrays. Patterns of Nonplanar Arrays. Elements, Transmission Lines, and Feed Architectures for Phased Arrays. Summary of Element Pattern and Mutual Impedance Effects. Array Error Effects. Special Array Feeds for Limited Field of View and Wideband Arrays.

2,233 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1997
TL;DR: This paper provides a comprehensive and detailed treatment of different beam-forming schemes, adaptive algorithms to adjust the required weighting on antennas, direction-of-arrival estimation methods-including their performance comparison-and effects of errors on the performance of an array system, as well as schemes to alleviate them.
Abstract: Array processing involves manipulation of signals induced on various antenna elements. Its capabilities of steering nulls to reduce cochannel interferences and pointing independent beams toward various mobiles, as well as its ability to provide estimates of directions of radiating sources, make it attractive to a mobile communications system designer. Array processing is expected to play an important role in fulfilling the increased demands of various mobile communications services. Part I of this paper showed how an array could be utilized in different configurations to improve the performance of mobile communications systems, with references to various studies where feasibility of apt array system for mobile communications is considered. This paper provides a comprehensive and detailed treatment of different beam-forming schemes, adaptive algorithms to adjust the required weighting on antennas, direction-of-arrival estimation methods-including their performance comparison-and effects of errors on the performance of an array system, as well as schemes to alleviate them. This paper brings together almost all aspects of array signal processing.

2,169 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A hierarchical neural network model which accounts for the learning and control capability of the CNS and provides a promising parallel-distributed control scheme for a large-scale complex object whose dynamics are only partially known is proposed.
Abstract: In order to control voluntary movements, the central nervous system (CNS) must solve the following three computational problems at different levels: the determination of a desired trajectory in the visual coordinates, the transformation of its coordinates to the body coordinates and the generation of motor command. Based on physiological knowledge and previous models, we propose a hierarchical neural network model which accounts for the generation of motor command. In our model the association cortex provides the motor cortex with the desired trajectory in the body coordinates, where the motor command is then calculated by means of long-loop sensory feedback. Within the spinocerebellum — magnocellular red nucleus system, an internal neural model of the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system is acquired with practice, because of the heterosynaptic plasticity, while monitoring the motor command and the results of movement. Internal feedback control with this dynamical model updates the motor command by predicting a possible error of movement. Within the cerebrocerebellum — parvocellular red nucleus system, an internal neural model of the inverse-dynamics of the musculo-skeletal system is acquired while monitoring the desired trajectory and the motor command. The inverse-dynamics model substitutes for other brain regions in the complex computation of the motor command. The dynamics and the inverse-dynamics models are realized by a parallel distributed neural network, which comprises many sub-systems computing various nonlinear transformations of input signals and a neuron with heterosynaptic plasticity (that is, changes of synaptic weights are assumed proportional to a product of two kinds of synaptic inputs). Control and learning performance of the model was investigated by computer simulation, in which a robotic manipulator was used as a controlled system, with the following results: (1) Both the dynamics and the inverse-dynamics models were acquired during control of movements. (2) As motor learning proceeded, the inverse-dynamics model gradually took the place of external feedback as the main controller. Concomitantly, overall control performance became much better. (3) Once the neural network model learned to control some movement, it could control quite different and faster movements. (4) The neural netowrk model worked well even when only very limited information about the fundamental dynamical structure of the controlled system was available. Consequently, the model not only accounts for the learning and control capability of the CNS, but also provides a promising parallel-distributed control scheme for a large-scale complex object whose dynamics are only partially known.

1,508 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Treichler1, B. Agee
TL;DR: In this article, an adaptive digital filtering algorithm that can compensate for both frequency-selective multipath and interference on constant envelope modulated signals is presented, which exploits the fact that multipath reception and various interference sources generate incidental amplitude modulation on the received signal.
Abstract: An adaptive digital filtering algorithm that can compensate for both frequency-selective multipath and interference on constant envelope modulated signals is presented. The method exploits the fact that multipath reception and various interference sources generate incidental amplitude modulation on the received signal. A class of so-called constant modulus performance functions is developed which sense this AM term but are insensitive to the angle modulation. Simple adaptive algorithms for finite-impulse-response (FIR) digital filters are developed which employ a gradient search of the performance function. One of the resulting algorithms is simulated for the example of an FM signal degraded by specular multipath propagation. Substantial improvements in noise power ratio (NPR) are observed (e.g., 25 dB) with moderately rapid convergence time. These results are then extended to include tonal interference on a FM signal and intersymbol interference on a QPSK data signal.

1,339 citations