scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

J. O. Haug

Bio: J. O. Haug is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sulpiride. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 52 citations.
Topics: Sulpiride

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In a material of 71 patients admitted because of acute or chronic psychoses, 32 patients treated with sulpiride and 39 with chlorpromazine, the effect of the two preparations was very similar as were the type and frequency of side effects, except that sulpirides did not cause sunrash.
Abstract: In a material of 71 patients admitted because of acute or chronic psychoses, 32 were treated with sulpiride (up to 1,800 mg per day) and 39 with chlorpromazine (up to 675 mg). Duration of treatment was from 4 to 8 weeks. The effect of the two preparations was very similar as were the type and frequency of side effects, except that sulpiride did not cause sunrash.

53 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A network meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and head-to-head randomised controlled trials and compared 32 antipsychotics aimed to compare and rank antipsychotic drugs by quantifying information from randomisedcontrolled trials.

735 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Examination of available preclinical and clinical data leads to two hypotheses concerning the mode of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs, and suggests that a relatively high ratio of serotonin 5-HT2:dopamine D2 receptor antagonism may subserve the atypicals profile.

260 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A subgroup of patients with chronic schizophrenia may substantially benefit from sulpiride addition to clozapine, and exhibited substantially greater and significant improvements in positive and negative psychotic symptoms.
Abstract: BACKGROUND We hypothesised that a combined regimen of clozapine, a relatively weak D2-dopaminergic antagonist, and sulpiride, a selective D2 blocker, would demonstrate a greater antipsychotic efficacy by enhancing the D2 blockade of clozapine. METHOD Twenty-eight people with schizophrenia, previously unresponsive to typical antipsychotics and only partially responsive to current treatment with clozapine, received, double-blind, 600 mg/day sulpiride or placebo, in addition to an ongoing clozapine treatment. The clinical status was evaluated before, during, and at the end of 10 weeks of sulpiride addition using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. RESULTS The clozapine-sulpiride group exhibited substantially greater and significant improvements in positive and negative psychotic symptoms. About half of them, characterised by a younger age and lower baseline SAPS scores, had a mean reduction of 42.4 and 50.4% in their BPRS and SAPS scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A subgroup of patients with chronic schizophrenia may substantially benefit from sulpiride addition to clozapine.

243 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is unlikely that the atypical antipsychotics and antiparkinsonian agents interact with only one subtype of DA receptor, or have their therapeutic actions only through that receptor, and other pharmacological characteristics of these agents are more critically involved in their unique behavioral effects.

114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A double‐blind study was performed comparing fixed doses of sulpiride and chlorpromazine for the treatment of schizophrenic patients, and interrater reliabilities for CPRS items and subscales were satisfactory.
Abstract: To evaluate the clinical potential of sulpiride for the treatment of schizophrenic patients, a double-blind study was performed comparing fixed doses of sulpiride (800 mg daily) and chlorpromazine (400 mg daily). Twentyfive schizophrenic (RDC) patients participated in each treatment group. Antipsychotic effects were evaluated by CPRS and NOSIE ratings before and after 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Interrater reliabilities for CPRS items and subscales were satisfactory. Treatment with sulpiride or chlorpromazine resulted in a significant reduction of psychotic morbidity as estimated by CPRS and global ratings. CPRS scores reflecting autism were significantly reduced in all ratings of sulpiride-treated patients, but only after four weeks in the chlorpromazine group. Total NOSIE scores indicated improvement in both treatment groups. A significant difference in favour of sulpiride was obtained for the NOSIE subscale “retardation”. Extrapyramidal side effects occurred at a similar frequency in both treatment groups. Autonomic side effects occurred to a greater extent in chlorpromazine-treated patients. Lactation was reported only in four sulpiride-treated patients. Liver transaminase enzymes in serum were markedly elevated only in chlorpromazine-treated patients. The results indicate that sulpiride has a marked antipsychotic effect which is at least not inferior to that of chlorpromazine. A better effect on autistic components of behaviour was demonstrated for sulpiride. The results indicate a higher risk of lactation but a lower risk of anticholinergic side effects and liver toxicity for treatment with sulpiride than with chlorpromazine.

84 citations