scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "James F. Fries published in 2003"


Journal Article
TL;DR: The Health Assessment Questionnaire has established itself as a valuable, effective, and sensitive tool for measurement of health status and has increased the credibility and use of validated self-report measurement techniques as a quantifiable set of hard data endpoints and has contributed to a new appreciation of outcome assessment.
Abstract: Over the last 2 decades, assessment of patient health status has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift, evolving from a predominant reliance on biochemical and physical measurements to an emphasis upon health outcomes based on the patient's personal appreciation of their illness. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), published in 1980, was among the first instruments based on patient centered dimensions. The HAQ was designed to represent a model of patient oriented outcome assessment and has played a major role in diverse areas such as prediction of successful aging, inversion of the therapeutic pyramid in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), quantification of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug gastropathy, development of risk factor models for osteoarthrosis, and examination of mortality risks in RA. The HAQ has established itself as a valuable, effective, and sensitive tool for measurement of health status. It has increased the credibility and use of validated self-report measurement techniques as a quantifiable set of hard data endpoints and has contributed to a new appreciation of outcome assessment. We review the development, content, and dissemination of the HAQ and provide reference sources for its uses, translations, and validations. We discuss contemporary issues regarding outcome assessment instruments relative to the HAQ's identity and utility. These include: (1) the issue of labeling instruments as generic versus disease-specific; (2) floor and ceiling effects in scales such as "disability"; (3) distances between values on scales; and (4) the continuing introduction of new measurement instruments and their potential effects.

741 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Health Assessment Questionnaire was designed to represent a model of patient-oriented outcome assessment and has played a major role in many diverse areas such as prediction of successful aging, inversion of the therapeutic pyramid in rheumatoid arthritis, quantification of NSAID gastropathy, development of risk factor models for osteoarthrosis, and examination of mortality risks in RA.
Abstract: The ability to effectively measure health-related quality-of-life longitudinally is central to describing the impacts of disease, treatment, or other insults, including normal aging, upon the patient. Over the last two decades, assessment of patient health status has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift, evolving from a predominant reliance on biochemical and physical measurements, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, lipid profiles, or radiographs, to an emphasis upon health outcomes based on the patient's personal appreciation of their illness. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), published in 1980, was among the first instruments based on generic, patient-centered dimensions. The HAQ was designed to represent a model of patient-oriented outcome assessment and has played a major role in many diverse areas such as prediction of successful aging, inversion of the therapeutic pyramid in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), quantification of NSAID gastropathy, development of risk factor models for osteoarthrosis, and examination of mortality risks in RA. Evidenced by its use over the past two decades in diverse settings, the HAQ has established itself as a valuable, effective, and sensitive tool for measurement of health status. It is available in more than 60 languages and is supported by a bibliography of more than 500 references. It has increased the credibility and use of validated self-report measurement techniques as a quantifiable set of hard data endpoints and has contributed to a new appreciation of outcome assessment. In this article, information regarding the HAQ's development, content, dissemination and reference sources for its uses, translations, and validations are provided.

663 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper draws on recent data from national surveys, observational longitudinal studies, and randomized, controlled trials to bring together the current evidence for morbidity compression in the United States and to outline the research agenda for the continued monitoring of trends in morbidity and disability.
Abstract: The Compression of Morbidity paradigm, introduced in 1980, maintains that if the average age at first infirmity, disability, or other morbidity is postponed and if this postponement is greater than increases in life expectancy, then cumulative lifetime morbidity will decrease-compressed between a later onset and the time of death. The National Long-Term Care Survey, the National Health Interview Survey, and other data now document declining disability trends beginning in 1982 and accelerating more recently. The decline is about 2% per year, contrasted with a decline in mortality rates of about 1% per year, thereby documenting compression of morbidity in the United States at the population level. Longitudinal studies now link good health risk status with long-term reductions in cumulative lifetime disability; persons with few behavioral health risks have only one-fourth the disability of those who have more risk factors, and the onset of disability is postponed from 7 to 12 years, far more than any increases in longevity in the groups. Randomized, controlled trials of health enhancement programs in elderly populations show reduction in health risks, improved health status, and decreased medical care utilization. Health policy initiatives now being undertaken have promise of increasing and consolidating health gains for the elderly.

337 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Average disability levels in rheumatoid arthritis have declined by approximately 40% in the 20+ years since 1977, consistent with a beneficial effect of the associated changes in treatment strategies.

107 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: OTC use of ASA, IBU, or APAP carries little risk of serious GI toxicity for most persons, although RA patients tended to have higher rates than OA patients and most serious problems encountered were in higher-risk patients.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The frequency of serious gastrointestinal (GI) complications has been quantitated with chronic high doses of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), but risk at lower dosages remains unknown. We examined the prevalence of serious GI events in patients taking aspirin (ASA), acetaminophen (APAP), or ibuprofen (IBU), focusing on low or intermittent use. METHODS: We studied 5692 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 3124 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) from 12 databank centers, with 36,262 patient-years of observation, who had taken one of 3 study analgesics, and examined the frequency of serious GI events requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: Treatment groups were of similar ages and severity. As lower doses of study analgesics were taken, serious GI events tended to be less prevalent. In patients taking a study drug alone, without other analgesics or corticosteroids, only one event occurred in over 900 patient-years of exposure, roughly equivalent to background. Rates of GI events while taking APAP with other concurrent therapy or corticosteroids were higher (p

57 citations