scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

James F. Fries

Bio: James F. Fries is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rheumatoid arthritis & Arthritis. The author has an hindex of 100, co-authored 369 publications receiving 83589 citations. Previous affiliations of James F. Fries include University of Saskatchewan & National Institutes of Health.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Increased blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines are associated with autoantibody targeting of citrullinated antigens and surrogate markers of disease activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Abstract: Objectives: To identify peripheral blood autoantibody and cytokine profiles that characterise clinically relevant subgroups of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis using arthritis antigen microarrays and a multiplex cytokine assay. Methods: Serum samples from 56 patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis of Results: Distinct antibody profiles were associated with subgroups of patients who exhibited high serum levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α, interleukin (IL)1β, IL6, IL13, IL15 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Significantly increased autoantibody reactivity against citrullinated epitopes was observed in patients within the cytokine “high” subgroup. Increased levels of TNFα, IL1α, IL12p40 and IL13, and the chemokines eotaxin/CCL11, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interferon-inducible protein 10, were present in early rheumatoid arthritis as compared with controls (p Conclusions: Increased blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines are associated with autoantibody targeting of citrullinated antigens and surrogate markers of disease activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Proteomic analysis of serum autoantibodies, cytokines and chemokines enables stratification of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis into molecular subgroups.

143 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall toxicity Index scores were computed from symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, and hospitalizations attributed to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy in 2,747 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and these differences are both clinically and statistically significant.
Abstract: Toxicity Index scores were computed from symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, and hospitalizations attributed to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy in 2,747 patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving 5,642 courses of 11 NSAIDs over 8,481 patient-years. Substantial differences in overall toxicity were found, the differences between drugs often being clinically significant (2-3 times as toxic) and highly statistically significant. The results strengthened after adjustment for differing patient characteristics, held generally across multiple ARAMIS (Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System) data bank centers, and persisted after use of different techniques for the weighting of side effects. The most toxic side effects were experienced by patients taking indomethacin (mean +/- SEM score 3.99 +/- 0.58), tolmetin sodium (3.96 +/- 0.74), and meclofenamate sodium (3.86 +/- 0.66). Least toxic were coated or buffered aspirin (1.19 +/- 0.10), salsalate (1.28 +/- 0.34), and ibuprofen (1.94 +/- 0.43). The most toxic drugs were generally taken in the lowest relative doses. There are statistical differences in overall toxicity between different NSAIDs as used in rheumatoid arthritis, and these differences are both clinically and statistically significant.

142 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Precise measures, such as PROMIS, efficiently incorporate patient self-report of health into research, potentially reducing research cost by lowering sample size requirements and the advent of routine IRT applications has the potential to transform PRO measurement.
Abstract: Objective. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires record health information directly from research participants because observers may not accurately represent the patient perspective. Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a US National Institutes of Health cooperative group charged with bringing PRO to a new level of precision and standardization across diseases by item development and use of item response theory (IRT). Methods. With IRT methods, improved items are calibrated on an underlying concept to form an item bank for a “domain” such as physical function (PF). The most informative items can be combined to construct efficient “instruments” such as 10-item or 20-item PF static forms. Each item is calibrated on the basis of the probability that a given person will respond at a given level, and the ability of the item to discriminate people from one another. Tailored forms may cover any desired level of the domain being measured. Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) selects the best items to sharpen the estimate of a person’s functional ability, based on prior responses to earlier questions. PROMIS item banks have been improved with experience from several thousand items, and are calibrated on over 21,000 respondents. Results. In areas tested to date, PROMIS PF instruments are superior or equal to Health Assessment Questionnaire and Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Survey legacy instruments in clarity, translatability, patient importance, reliability, and sensitivity to change. Conclusion. Precise measures, such as PROMIS, efficiently incorporate patient self-report of health into research, potentially reducing research cost by lowering sample size requirements. The advent of routine IRT applications has the potential to transform PRO measurement.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that use of rheumatology subspecialty care is associated with better health outcomes in r heumatoid arthritis.
Abstract: Background: To determine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis and their physicians make appropriate decisions regarding referral to rheumatologists and the need for continuing rheumatology care, we examined the relationship between the progression of functional disability in these patients and their use of rheumatology subspecialty care over time. Methods: A cohort of 282 patients with rheumatoid arthritis was followed prospectively for up to 10 years. Participants were categorized into three subgroups based on the pattern of care received from rheumatologists over the study period: patients who were never treated by a rheumatologist; patients treated by a rheumatologist only intermittently; and patients treated by a rheumatologist at least once during each 6-month study period. The outcome was the rate of progression of functional disability, measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index. Results: Among the 52 patients who had not been referred to a rheumatologist, 30 (58%) had rates of progression of functional disability that were stable or improving over time (rate Conclusions: Most patients with rheumatoid arthritis in this community cohort were treated by a rheumatologist, but 42% of those not referred had progressively increasing functional disability. Among patients treated by rheumatologists, those who had continuing care from rheumatologists experienced lower rates of progression of functional disability than those who had only intermittent care. These results suggest that use of rheumatology subspecialty care is associated with better health outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. (Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2229-2237)

137 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were formulated from a computerized analysis of 262 contemporary, consecutively studied patients with RA and 262 control subjects with rheumatic diseases other than RA (non-RA).
Abstract: The revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were formulated from a computerized analysis of 262 contemporary, consecutively studied patients with RA and 262 control subjects with rheumatic diseases other than RA (non-RA). The new criteria are as follows: 1) morning stiffness in and around joints lasting at least 1 hour before maximal improvement; 2) soft tissue swelling (arthritis) of 3 or more joint areas observed by a physician; 3) swelling (arthritis) of the proximal interphalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, or wrist joints; 4) symmetric swelling (arthritis); 5) rheumatoid nodules; 6) the presence of rheumatoid factor; and 7) radiographic erosions and/or periarticular osteopenia in hand and/or wrist joints. Criteria 1 through 4 must have been present for at least 6 weeks. Rheumatoid arthritis is defined by the presence of 4 or more criteria, and no further qualifications (classic, definite, or probable) or list of exclusions are required. In addition, a "classification tree" schema is presented which performs equally as well as the traditional (4 of 7) format. The new criteria demonstrated 91-94% sensitivity and 89% specificity for RA when compared with non-RA rheumatic disease control subjects.

19,409 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 1971 preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were revised and updated to incorporate new immunologic knowledge and improve disease classification and showed gains in sensitivity and specificity.
Abstract: The 1971 preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were revised and updated to incorporate new immunologic knowledge and improve disease classification. The 1982 revised criteria include fluorescence antinuclear antibody and antibody to native DNA and Sm antigen. Some criteria involving the same organ systems were aggregated into single criteria. Raynaud's phenomenon and alopecia were not included in the 1982 revised criteria because of low sensitivity and specificity. The new criteria were 96% sensitive and 96% specific when tested with SLE and control patient data gathered from 18 participating clinics. When compared with the 1971 criteria, the 1982 revised criteria showed gains in sensitivity and specificity.

14,272 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In the early 1990s, the National Kidney Foundation (K/DOQI) developed a set of clinical practice guidelines to define chronic kidney disease and to classify stages in the progression of kidney disease.

10,265 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In 1992, Piette and colleagues suggested that the ACR revised criteria be reevaluated in light of the above discoveries, and the presence and clinical associations or antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with SLE was suggested.
Abstract: In 1982, the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)published revised criteria for the classification of systemiclupus erythematosus (SLE) (1). During the ensuing decade several investigators, including Drs. Graham Hughes and Donato Alarcon-Segovia, among others, have described the presence and clinical associations or antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with SLE, as well as the occurrence of theprimary antiphospholipid syndrome (2-5). In 1992, Piette and colleagues suggested that the ACR revised criteria be reevaluated in light of the above discoveries (6).

9,999 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia are widespread pain in combination with 2) tenderness at 11 or more of the 18 specific tender point sites, and no exclusions are made for the presence of concomitant radiographic or laboratory abnormalities.
Abstract: To develop criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia, we studied 558 consecutive patients: 293 patients with fibromyalgia and 265 control patients. Interviews and examinations were performed by trained, blinded assessors. Control patients for the group with primary fibromyalgia were matched for age and sex, and limited to patients with disorders that could be confused with primary fibromyalgia. Control patients for the group with secondary-concomitant fibromyalgia were matched for age, sex, and concomitant rheumatic disorders. Widespread pain (axial plus upper and lower segment plus left- and right-sided pain) was found in 97.6% of all patients with fibromyalgia and in 69.1% of all control patients. The combination of widespread pain and mild or greater tenderness in greater than or equal to 11 of 18 tender point sites yielded a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 81.1%. Primary fibromyalgia patients and secondary-concomitant fibromyalgia patients did not differ statistically in any major study variable, and the criteria performed equally well in patients with and those without concomitant rheumatic conditions. The newly proposed criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia are 1) widespread pain in combination with 2) tenderness at 11 or more of the 18 specific tender point sites. No exclusions are made for the presence of concomitant radiographic or laboratory abnormalities. At the diagnostic or classification level, the distinction between primary fibromyalgia and secondary-concomitant fibromyalgia (as defined in the text) is abandoned.

9,289 citations