scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

James F. Gilliam

Bio: James F. Gilliam is an academic researcher from North Carolina State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Foraging. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 49 publications receiving 9658 citations. Previous affiliations of James F. Gilliam include University at Albany, SUNY & Michigan State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The body size is one of the most important attributes of an organism from an ecological and evolutionary point of view as mentioned in this paper, and it has a predominant influence on an animal's energetic requirements, its potential for resource exploitation, and its susceptibility to natural enemies.
Abstract: Body size is manifestly one of the most important attributes of an organism from an ecological and evolutionary point of view. Size has a predominant influence on an animal's energetic requirements, its potential for resource exploitation, and its susceptibility to natural enemies. A large literature now exists on how physiological, life history, and population parameters scale with body dimensions (24, 131). The ecological literature on species interactions and the structure of animal communities also stresses the importance of body size. Differences in body size are a major means by which species avoid direct overlap in resource use (153), and size-selective predation can be a primary organizing force in some communities (20, 70). Size thus imposes important constraints on the manner in which an organism interacts with its environment and influences the strength, type, and symmetry of interactions with other species (152, 207). Paradoxically, ecologists have virtually ignored the implications of these observations for interactions among species that exhibit size-distributed populations. For instance, it has been often suggested that competing species

3,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 1983-Ecology
TL;DR: Methods to predict the additional mortality expected on a cohort due to a reduction in growth rate are developed, and the potential for predation risk to enforce size—class segregation is discussed, which leads de facto to resource partitioning.
Abstract: We present an experiment designed to test the hypothesis that fish respond to both relative predation risk and habitat profitability in choosing habitats in which to feed. Identical populations of three size—classes of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) were stocked on both sides of a divided pond (29 m in diameter), and eight piscivorous largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) were introduced to one side. Sizes of both species were chosen such that the small class of bluegills was very vulnerable to the bass, whereas the largest class was invulnerable to bass predation. We then compared mortality, habitat use, and growth of each size—class in the presence and absence of the bass. Only the small size—class suffered significant mortality from the bass (each bass consumed on average about one small bluegill every 3.8 d); the two larger size—classes exhibited similar mortality rates on both sides of the pond. In the absence of the bass, we found that habitat use of all size—classes was similar and that the pattern of habitat use maximized foraging return rates (Werner et al. 1983). In the presence of the bass the two larger size—classes chose habitats to maximize return rates, but the small size—class obtained a greater fraction of its diet from the vegetation habitat, where foraging return rates were only one—third of those in the more open habitats. The small size—class further exhibited a significant depression in individual growth in the presence of the bass; the growth increment during the experiment was 27% less than that for small bluegills in the absence of the bass. Because of the reduced utilization of more open habitats by the small fish in the presence of bass, resources in these habitats were released to the larger size—classes, which showed greater growth in the presence of the bass than in its absence. We develop methods to predict the additional mortality expected on a cohort due to a reduction in growth rate (because individuals are spending a longer time in vunerable sizes), and discuss and potential for predation risk to enforce size—class segregation, which leads de facto to resource partitioning.

1,637 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 1987-Ecology
TL;DR: A model that specifies the choice of foraging areas ("habitats") that would minimize total mortality risk while allowing collection of some arbitrary net energy gain is presented and tested.
Abstract: Animals commonly choose among habitats that differ both in foraging return and mortality hazard. However, no experimental study has attempted to predict the level of increase in resources, or the decrease in mortality hazard, which will induce a forager to shift from a safer to a more hazardous (but richer) foraging area. Here we present and test a model that specifies the choice of foraging areas ("habitats") that would minimize total mortality risk while allowing collection of some arbitrary net energy gain. We tested the model with juvenile creek chubs (Semotilus atromaculatus) in an exper- imental field stream in which the foragers could utilize a foodless refuge and choose between two foraging areas that differed in experimentally manipulated resource densities (Tubifex spp. worms in sediments) and mortality hazard (adult creek chubs). For the case tested, the model specified a simple rule: "use the refuge plus the site with the lowest ratio of mortality rate (A) to gross foraging rate (f)," i.e., "minimize l/f." Independent prior mea- surements of mortality hazard (as a function of predator density) and gross foraging rate (as a function of resource density) allowed us to predict the resource level in the more hazardous foraging site that should induce a shift from the safer to the more hazardous site. The chubs' preferences in subsequent choice experiments agreed well with the theo- retical predictions. The "minimize Al/f" rule (deaths per unit energy), perhaps in modified form, provides a simple alternative to the "maximize f " (energy per unit time) criterion that applies to

864 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Nov 2001-Ecology
Abstract: A predator's per capita feeding rate on prey, or its functional response, provides a foundation for predator-prey theory. Since 1959, Holling's prey-dependent Type II functional response, a model that is a function of prey abundance only, has served as the basis for a large literature on predator-prey theory. We present statistical evidence from 19 predator-prey systems that three predator-dependent functional responses (Beddington- DeAngelis, Crowley-Martin, and Hassell-Varley), i.e., models that are functions of both prey and predator abundance because of predator interference, can provide better descrip- tions of predator feeding over a range of predator-prey abundances. No single functional response best describes all of the data sets. Given these functional forms, we suggest use of the Beddington-DeAngelis or Hassell-Varley model when predator feeding rate becomes independent of predator density at high prey density and use of the Crowley-Martin model when predator feeding rate is decreased by higher predator density even when prey density is high.

644 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results show that a behavioral trait, not discernible from body size or sex, contributes to dispersal and that a component of fitness of surviving “dispersers” is elevated above that of “stayers,” a fundamental assumption or prediction of many models of the evolution of dispersal through hazardous habitat.
Abstract: Leptokurtic distributions of movement distances observed in field‐release studies, in which some individuals move long distances while most remain at or near their release point, are a common feature of mobile animals. However, because leptokurtosis is predicted to be transient in homogeneous populations, persistent leptokurtosis suggests a population heterogeneity. We found evidence for a heterogeneity that may generate persistent leptokurtosis. We tested individuals of the Trinidad killifish Rivulus hartii for boldness in a tank test and released them back into their native stream. Boldness in the tank test predicted distance moved in the field releases, even after effects of size and sex were removed. Further, data from a 19‐mo mark‐recapture study showed that individual growth correlated positively with movement in a predator‐threatened river zone where the Rivulus population is spatially fragmented and dispersal is likely to be a hazardous activity. In contrast, no such correlation existed ...

591 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols used xiii 1.
Abstract: Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols Used xiii 1. The Importance of Islands 3 2. Area and Number of Speicies 8 3. Further Explanations of the Area-Diversity Pattern 19 4. The Strategy of Colonization 68 5. Invasibility and the Variable Niche 94 6. Stepping Stones and Biotic Exchange 123 7. Evolutionary Changes Following Colonization 145 8. Prospect 181 Glossary 185 References 193 Index 201

14,171 citations

Journal Article
Fumio Tajima1
30 Oct 1989-Genomics
TL;DR: It is suggested that the natural selection against large insertion/deletion is so weak that a large amount of variation is maintained in a population.

11,521 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work has shown that predation is a major selective force in the evolution of several morphological and behavioral characteristics of animals and the importance of predation during evolutionary time has been underestimated.
Abstract: Predation has long been implicated as a major selective force in the evolution of several morphological and behavioral characteristics of animals. The importance of predation during evolutionary ti...

7,461 citations

Book
01 Jan 1998
TL;DR: In this book the authors investigate the nonlinear dynamics of the self-regulation of social and economic behavior, and of the closely related interactions among species in ecological communities.
Abstract: Every form of behavior is shaped by trial and error. Such stepwise adaptation can occur through individual learning or through natural selection, the basis of evolution. Since the work of Maynard Smith and others, it has been realized how game theory can model this process. Evolutionary game theory replaces the static solutions of classical game theory by a dynamical approach centered not on the concept of rational players but on the population dynamics of behavioral programs. In this book the authors investigate the nonlinear dynamics of the self-regulation of social and economic behavior, and of the closely related interactions among species in ecological communities. Replicator equations describe how successful strategies spread and thereby create new conditions that can alter the basis of their success, i.e., to enable us to understand the strategic and genetic foundations of the endless chronicle of invasions and extinctions that punctuate evolution. In short, evolutionary game theory describes when to escalate a conflict, how to elicit cooperation, why to expect a balance of the sexes, and how to understand natural selection in mathematical terms. Comprehensive treatment of ecological and game theoretic dynamics Invasion dynamics and permanence as key concepts Explanation in terms of games of things like competition between species

4,480 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The body size is one of the most important attributes of an organism from an ecological and evolutionary point of view as mentioned in this paper, and it has a predominant influence on an animal's energetic requirements, its potential for resource exploitation, and its susceptibility to natural enemies.
Abstract: Body size is manifestly one of the most important attributes of an organism from an ecological and evolutionary point of view. Size has a predominant influence on an animal's energetic requirements, its potential for resource exploitation, and its susceptibility to natural enemies. A large literature now exists on how physiological, life history, and population parameters scale with body dimensions (24, 131). The ecological literature on species interactions and the structure of animal communities also stresses the importance of body size. Differences in body size are a major means by which species avoid direct overlap in resource use (153), and size-selective predation can be a primary organizing force in some communities (20, 70). Size thus imposes important constraints on the manner in which an organism interacts with its environment and influences the strength, type, and symmetry of interactions with other species (152, 207). Paradoxically, ecologists have virtually ignored the implications of these observations for interactions among species that exhibit size-distributed populations. For instance, it has been often suggested that competing species

3,129 citations