scispace - formally typeset
J

James R. Detert

Researcher at University of Virginia

Publications -  43
Citations -  7696

James R. Detert is an academic researcher from University of Virginia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Employee voice & Moral disengagement. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 36 publications receiving 6508 citations. Previous affiliations of James R. Detert include Harvard University & Saint Petersburg State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?

TL;DR: This article investigated the relationship between two types of change-oriented leadership (transformational leadership and managerial openness) and subordinate improvement-oriented voice in a two-phase study and found that openness is more consistently related to voice, given controls for numerous individual differences in subordinates' personality, satisfaction, and job demography.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Framework for Linking Culture and Improvement Initiatives in Organizations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a synthesis of the general dimensions of organizational culture used most commonly in extant research and outline how these general dimensions correspond to the specific values and beliefs underlying total quality management (TQM) practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes.

TL;DR: Testing hypotheses with 3 waves of survey data support 4 individual difference hypotheses, specifically, that empathy and moral identity are negatively related to moral disengagement, while trait cynicism and chance locus of control orientation are positively related tomoral disengagement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior

TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of individuals' propensity to morally disengage on a broad range of unethical organizational behaviors was examined, and the power of the propensity to moral disengage to predict multiple types of unethical organisational behavior was demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work

TL;DR: This paper examined implicit voice theories, taken-for-granted beliefs about when and why speaking up at work is risky or inappropriate, using interview data from a large corporation and found that speaking up is risky and inappropriate.