Jan F. Silverman

Bio: Jan F. Silverman is an academic researcher from Allegheny General Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Adenocarcinoma & Fine-needle aspiration. The author has an hindex of 30, co-authored 99 publications receiving 2763 citations. Previous affiliations of Jan F. Silverman include University of Toronto & Drexel University.

Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in stage I non-small cell lung cancer correlates with neoangiogenesis and a poor prognosis.

Abstract: Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in tumor growth and metastasis. We investigated the prognostic significance of VEGF overexpression, intratumoral microvessel density (MVD), and angiolymphatic invasion in stage Ia-b non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Eighty-five patients undergoing complete surgical resection of pathologic stage Ia-b NSCLC were evaluated. The mean and median clinical follow-up were 37.1 and 39.0 months (range, 30–44 months), respectively. Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were stained with VEGF and CD31 (a specific endothelial marker) using immunohistochemical methods. VEGF staining was evaluated, by combining both percentage of positive tumor cells and staining intensity, as low (negative and 20% of tumor cells showing strong positivity). CD31 staining was expressed as MVD per high power field at 400× magnification. Angiolymphatic invasion was expressed as either presence or absence. Results: Low VEGF expression was seen in 25 (29%) patients, and high VEGF expression was seen in 60 (71%) patients. The survival rate in patients with low VEGF expression was significantly higher (80%) than that in those with high VEGF expression (48%, P = .018). The mean MVD in the low VEGF group was 23.7 ± 5.7 vs. 34.4 ± 9.3 in the high VEGF group (P = .001). Patients with high MVD also had a significantly lower survival rate than did those with low MVD count (46% vs. 73%, P = .0053). Age, sex, tumor type, and tumor differentiation were not found to be associated with overall survival. The presence of angiolymphatic invasion and T2 stage (i.e., tumor size > 3 cm) were associated with decreased survival. High VEGF expression, tumor size, and angiolymphatic invasion emerged as three independent factors predicting worsening prognosis using multivariate analysis. Conclusion: High VEGF expression within stage I NSCLC is closely associated with high intratumoral angiogenesis and poor prognosis. Immunohistochemical evaluation of T stage and VEGF expression along with examination of angiolymphatic invasion perioperatively may aid in predicting prognosis. Adjuvant therapies aimed at retarding tumor angiogenesis may be considered for stage I NSCLC patients with high VEGF levels.

Diagnostic value of CDX-2 and TTF-1 expressions in separating metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of unknown origin.

Abstract: Histomorphologic features and routine endocrine immunohistochemical (IHC) markers do not differentiate neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in relation to their location, making it difficult to establish the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Site-specific markers would be useful, particularly when examining small biopsies. CDX-2 and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) are transcription factors that have been recently proposed as IHC markers of intestinal and pulmonary adenocarcinomas, respectively. However, their expression in NETs has not been widely studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the expression of TTF-1 and CDX-2 in NETs and their potential usefulness in distinguishing gastrointestinal and pulmonary NETs from other sites. We performed an IHC study on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from 155 primary NETs, including 60 pulmonary, 60 gastrointestinal, 30 pancreatic, and 5 NETs from other sites. In addition, we evaluated 13 metastatic NETs, including 11 cases of gastrointestinal and 2 of pulmonary origin. In this study, CDX-2 was expressed in 28/60 (47%) of gastrointestinal NETs with the following results: 11/11 (100%) appendiceal, 12/14 (86%) small intestinal, 3/4 (75%) colonic, 2/11 (18%) rectal, and 0/20 (0%) gastric. TTF-1 was expressed in pulmonary carcinoid tumors in 13/30 (43%) and in 27/30 (90%) pulmonary small cell carcinomas. NETs of other origins (pancreas, skin, ovary, and thymus) were negative for both TTF-1 and CDX-2. Metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of intestinal origin were positive for CDX-2 and negative for TTF-1. In conclusion, CDX-2 expression is highly specific in identifying NETs of intestinal origin and TTF-1 expression is helpful in identifying NETs of pulmonary origin, which can be quite useful in the diagnosis of metastatic NETs of unknown origin.

Endoglin (CD105) and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic markers in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Abstract: We studied endoglin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression as prognostic markers in prostatic adenocarcinoma in 50 radical prostatectomy specimens Cases were further categorized by Gleason score as follows: 8 to 10, 9 cases; 7(4 + 3), 9 cases; 7 (3 + 4), 14 cases; 6, 13 cases; and 4 or 5, 5 cases All cases were immunostained for endoglin, CD31, and VEGF Positively stained microvessels were counted in densely vascular foci in a x 400 field VEGF staining intensity was scored on a 2-tiered scale Results were correlated with survival and other parameters Endoglin demonstrated significantly more microvessels than did CD31 (mean +/- SD, 37 +/- 15 vs 22 +/- 17; P < 001) VEGF expression was low in 21 cases (42%) and high in 29 (58%) Endoglin correlated positively with Gleason score, lymph node metastases, tumor stage, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen level (P < 05) but not with CD31 VEGF correlated significantly with angiolymphatic invasion and Gleason score (P < 05) A high endoglin microvessel count and VEGF expression correlated with shorter survival Endoglin is a more specific and sensitive marker for tumor angiogenesis than CD31 and may serve as a prognostic marker for prostatic adenocarcinoma

Epidemiology and Outcome of Zygomycosis: A Review of 929 Reported Cases

Abstract: Background Zygomycosis is an increasingly emerging life-threatening infection. There is no single comprehensive literature review that describes the epidemiology and outcome of this disease. Methods We reviewed reports of zygomycosis in the English-language literature since 1885 and analyzed 929 eligible cases. We included in the database only those cases for which the underlying condition, the pattern of infection, the surgical and antifungal treatments, and survival were described. Results The mean age of patients was 38.8 years; 65% were male. The prevalence and overall mortality were 36% and 44%, respectively, for diabetes; 19% and 35%, respectively, for no underlying condition; and 17% and 66%, respectively, for malignancy. The most common types of infection were sinus (39%), pulmonary (24%), and cutaneous (19%). Dissemination developed in 23% of cases. Mortality varied with the site of infection: 96% of patients with disseminated disease died, 85% with gastrointestinal infection died, and 76% with pulmonary infection died. The majority of patients with malignancy (92 [60%] of 154) had pulmonary disease, whereas the majority of patients with diabetes (222 [66%] of 337) had sinus disease. Rhinocerebral disease was seen more frequently in patients with diabetes (145 [33%] of 337), compared with patients with malignancy (6 [4%] of 154). Hematogenous dissemination to skin was rare; however, 78 (44%) of 176 cutaneous infections were complicated by deep extension or dissemination. Survival was 3% (8 of 241 patients) for cases that were not treated, 61% (324 of 532) for cases treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate, 57% (51 of 90) for cases treated with surgery alone, and 70% (328 of 470) for cases treated with antifungal therapy and surgery. By multivariate analysis, infection due to Cunninghamella species and disseminated disease were independently associated with increased rates of death (odds ratios, 2.78 and 11.2, respectively). Conclusions Outcome from zygomycosis varies as a function of the underlying condition, site of infection, and use of antifungal therapy.

Sarcoidosis

Abstract: 结节病易误诊,据王洪武等~([1])收集国内18篇关于此病误诊的文献,误诊率高达63.2%,当然有误诊就会有误治,如孙永昌等~([2])报道26例结节病在影像学检查诊断的第一印象中拟诊结核5例,其中就有2例完成规范的抗结核治疗,为此应引起临床对本病诊治的重视。

Clinical Application of Antiangiogenic Therapy: Microvessel Density, What It Does and Doesn't Tell Us

Abstract: A substantial number of clinical trials using antiangiogenic therapies are ongoing worldwide. How to achieve the maximum benefit from these therapies and how to monitor patient response are of paramount concern to investigators. There are currently no markers of the net angiogenic activity of a tumor available to aid investigators in the design of antiangiogenic treatment schemes. It stands to reason that quantification of various aspects of tumor vasculature might provide an indication of angiogenic activity. One often-quantified aspect of tumor vasculature is microvessel density. Studies over the last decade have demonstrated the value of using tumor microvessel density as a prognostic indicator for a wide range of cancers. In this context, measurement of microvessel density facilitates assessments of disease stage and the likelihood of recurrence and helps guide treatment decisions. Recently, however, it has been assumed by some investigators that measurements of microvessel density may also reveal the degree of angiogenic activity in a tumor. Based on this assumption, quantification of microvessel density is thought to constitute a surrogate marker for the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents as well as a means by which to assess which patients are good candidates for antiangiogenic therapy prior to treatment. Here we contend that, although microvessel density is a useful prognostic marker, it is not, by itself, an indicator of therapeutic efficacy, nor should it be used to guide the stratification of patients for therapeutic trials. In this review, we discuss the evidence for these assertions and what can and cannot be determined from measurements of microvessel density.