scispace - formally typeset
J

Jane Humphries

Researcher at London School of Economics and Political Science

Publications -  121
Citations -  4420

Jane Humphries is an academic researcher from London School of Economics and Political Science. The author has contributed to research in topics: Child labour & Wage. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 116 publications receiving 4065 citations. Previous affiliations of Jane Humphries include University of Massachusetts Amherst & University of Delhi.

Papers
More filters
Book

Gender and Economics

TL;DR: The authors survey the contributions of economists to the understanding of gender in economics and present a collection of 27 articles dating from 1923 to 1994, including contributions from: D. Aigner, M. Becker, G.C. Courant, F.E. Edgeworth, P. England, J.N. Nelson, S.Gunderson, H.I.
Posted Content

`Because they are too menny...` children, mothers, and fertility decline: The evidence from working-class autobiographies of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries

TL;DR: This paper used working-class autobiography of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to develop understanding of sources of income and patterns of dependency and to illuminate the motives towards smaller families, but male responsibilities did not extend to stretching male wages to cover the variable demands of smaller or larger families.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cities, market integration, and going to sea: stunting and the standard of living in early nineteenth‐century England and Wales1

TL;DR: In this article, the 1840s Admiralty seamen's tickets were used to explore three anthropometric issues: being born in a city, with its associated disamenities, lead to stunting.
Posted Content

Unreal Wages? A New Empirical Foundation for the Study of Living Standards and Economic Growth in England, 1260‐1860

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use evidence of labour market arbitrage to argue that existing real wage estimates are badly off target, because they overestimate the medieval working year but underestimate the industrial one.