scispace - formally typeset
J

Jane Jenson

Researcher at Université de Montréal

Publications -  143
Citations -  4487

Jane Jenson is an academic researcher from Université de Montréal. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & Citizenship. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 141 publications receiving 4337 citations. Previous affiliations of Jane Jenson include Carleton University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

New Routes to Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State

TL;DR: The notion of social cohesion appears when policy communities are engaged in discussing and redesigning citizenship regimes as discussed by the authors, and one aspect of the citizenship regime with which reformers are concerned is the welfare architecture, and in particular the kind of state needed in the new know-edge economy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Behind the Lines: Gender and the Two World Wars.

TL;DR: The authors examines the redefinition of gender that occurred in many Western countries during both world wars and shows how much the world wars provided battlegrounds not only for nations but for the sexes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diffusing Ideas for After Neoliberalism: The Social Investment Perspective in Europe and Latin America

TL;DR: By the mid-1990s, neo-liberalism had reached its economic, social and political limits as mentioned in this paper, and international as well national and even sub-national social policymakers in and concerned with Latin Am...
Journal ArticleDOI

Lost in Translation: The Social Investment Perspective and Gender Equality

TL;DR: The social investment perspective is replacing standard neoliberalism in Latin America as well as Europe as mentioned in this paper, with it come ideas about social citizenship that reconfigure the citizenship regimes of the three regions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGO TM paradigm of an active society

TL;DR: English Social Policy communities now often focus on ‘new social risks’ as mentioned in this paper, and they also consider that these risks call for ‘social investments’, but they recognise that divergences exist in the ways that the paradigm is implemented.