scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jane Shakespeare-Finch

Bio: Jane Shakespeare-Finch is an academic researcher from Queensland University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Posttraumatic growth & Personality. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 144 publications receiving 4948 citations. Previous affiliations of Jane Shakespeare-Finch include University of Tasmania & University of Queensland.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Antonio Terracciano1, Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek, N. Ádám2, L. Adamovová3, C.-k. Ahn4, H.-n. Ahn4, B. M. Alansari, Lidia Alcalay5, Jüri Allik6, Alois Angleitner, María Dolores Avia7, Lindsay E. Ayearst8, Claudio Barbaranelli9, Andrew Beer10, M. A. Borg-Cunen11, Denis Bratko, Marina Brunner-Sciarra12, L. Budzinski13, N. Camart14, Donatien Dahourou15, F. De Fruyt, M. I. P. de Lima16, G. E. H. del Pilar17, Ed Diener18, Ruth Falzon11, K. Fernando19, Emília Ficková3, Ronald Fischer20, Carmen Flores-Mendoza, M. A. Ghayur21, Sami Gülgöz22, Bo Hagberg23, Jamin Halberstadt19, Magdalena S. Halim24, Martina Hřebíčková25, J. Humrichouse10, Hans Henrik Jensen26, D. D. Jocic, F. H. Jónsson27, Brigitte Khoury28, W. Klinkosz24, Goran Knežević29, Mary Anne Lauri11, N. Leibovich30, Thomas A. Martin31, Iris Marušić, Khairul Anwar Mastor32, David Matsumoto33, Margaret McRorie34, B. Meshcheriakov35, Erik Lykke Mortensen26, M. Munyae36, János Nagy2, Katsuharu Nakazato37, Florence Nansubuga38, Shigehiro Oishi39, A. O. Ojedokun40, Fritz Ostendorf, Delroy L. Paulhus41, S. Pelevin35, J.-M. Petot14, N. Podobnik, Jose Porrata42, V. S. Pramila43, G. Prentice34, Anu Realo6, Norma Reátegui12, Jean-Pierre Rolland14, Jérôme Rossier44, Willibald Ruch, Velko S. Rus45, M.L. Sánchez-Bernardos7, Vanina Schmidt30, S. Sciculna-Calleja11, A. Sekowski24, Jane Shakespeare-Finch46, Yoshiko Shimonaka47, Franco Simonetti5, Tilahun Sineshaw48, Jerzy Siuta49, Peter B. Smith50, Paul D. Trapnell51, K. K. Trobst8, Lei Wang52, Michelle Yik53, A. Zupančič, Robert R. McCrae1 
National Institutes of Health1, Eötvös Loránd University2, Slovak Academy of Sciences3, Pusan National University4, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile5, University of Tartu6, Complutense University of Madrid7, Keele University8, Sapienza University of Rome9, University of Iowa10, University of Malta11, Cayetano Heredia University12, University of Melbourne13, University of Paris14, University of Ouagadougou15, University of Coimbra16, University of the Philippines Diliman17, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign18, University of Otago19, Victoria University of Wellington20, Al Akhawayn University21, Koç University22, Lund University23, The Catholic University of America24, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic25, University of Copenhagen26, University of Iceland27, American University of Beirut28, University of Belgrade29, University of Buenos Aires30, Susquehanna University31, National University of Malaysia32, San Francisco State University33, Queen's University Belfast34, International University, Cambodia35, University of Botswana36, Iwate Prefectural University37, Makerere University38, University of Virginia39, University of Ibadan40, University of British Columbia41, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras42, Andhra University43, University of Lausanne44, University of Ljubljana45, Queensland University of Technology46, Bunkyo Gakuin University47, Ramapo College48, Jagiellonian University49, University of Sussex50, University of Winnipeg51, Peking University52, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology53
07 Oct 2005-Science
TL;DR: Perceptions of national character appear to be unfounded stereotypes that may serve the function of maintaining a national identity.
Abstract: Most people hold beliefs about personality characteristics typical of members of their own and others' cultures. These perceptions of national character may be generalizations from personal experience, stereotypes with a "kernel of truth," or inaccurate stereotypes. We obtained national character ratings of 3989 people from 49 cultures and compared them with the average personality scores of culture members assessed by observer ratings and self-reports. National character ratings were reliable but did not converge with assessed traits. Perceptions of national character thus appear to be unfounded stereotypes that may serve the function of maintaining a national identity.

403 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that cross-cultural variations in aging perceptions were associated with culture-level indicators of population aging, education levels, values, and national character stereotypes, and these associations were stronger for societal views on aging and perceptions of socioemotional changes than for perceptions of physical and cognitive changes.
Abstract: College students (N=3,435) in 26 cultures reported their perceptions of age-related changes in physical, cognitive, and socioemotional areas of functioning and rated societal views of aging within their culture. There was widespread cross-cultural consensus regarding the expected direction of aging trajectories with (a) perceived declines in societal views of aging, physical attractiveness, the ability to perform everyday tasks, and new learning; (b) perceived increases in wisdom, knowledge, and received respect; and (c) perceived stability in family authority and life satisfaction. Cross-cultural variations in aging perceptions were associated with culture-level indicators of population aging, education levels, values, and national character stereotypes. These associations were stronger for societal views on aging and perceptions of socioemotional changes than for perceptions of physical and cognitive changes. A consideration of culture-level variables also suggested that previously reported differences in aging perceptions between Asian and Western countries may be related to differences in population structure.

363 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis examined both the strength and the linearity of the relationship between symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and perceptions of post traumatic growth (PTG) as well as identifying the potential moderating roles of trauma type and age.

333 citations

Book
16 May 2018
TL;DR: The Handbook of Posttraumatic growth as mentioned in this paper provides a wide range of answers to questions concerning knowledge of posttraumatic growth (PTG) theory, its synthesis and contrast with other theories and models, and its applications in diverse settings.
Abstract: Posttraumatic Growth reworks and overhauls the seminal 2006 Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth. It provides a wide range of answers to questions concerning knowledge of posttraumatic growth (PTG) theory, its synthesis and contrast with other theories and models, and its applications in diverse settings. The book starts with an overview of the history, components, and outcomes of PTG. Next, chapters review quantitative, qualitative, and cross-cultural research on PTG, including in relation to cognitive function, identity formation, cross-national and gender differences, and similarities and differences between adults and children. The final section shows readers how to facilitate optimal outcomes with PTG at the level of the individual, the group, the community, and society.

224 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results indicated five factors for the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, and moderate levels of PTG, and Trauma severity was found to significantly predict PTG in addition to a positive correlation between PTG and negative posttrauma effects.
Abstract: Recent trauma literature has supported a philosophical shift from a pathogenic to a salutogenic paradigm in which the focus is on positive, as well as negative, posttrauma changes; however, empirical knowledge exploring the different domains of positive change or posttraumatic growth (PTG) is scarce. The present study investigated the multidimensionality of PTG in Australian undergraduate students (N = 219). Results indicated five factors for the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, and moderate levels of PTG. Trauma severity was found to significantly predict PTG in addition to a positive correlation between PTG and negative posttrauma effects. While not negating negative effects of traumatic experiences, this area of traumatology research has important implications for redefining the "victims" of trauma as individuals capable of positive change rather than merely surviving.

188 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of the authors' books like this one.
Abstract: Thank you for downloading using multivariate statistics. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite novels like this using multivariate statistics, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful bugs inside their laptop. using multivariate statistics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our books collection saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read.

14,604 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Sep 1978-Science

5,182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World as discussed by the authors is a recent book about gender equality and cultural change around the world, focusing on women's empowerment and empowerment.
Abstract: Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World.

1,130 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The BFI-2 introduces a robust hierarchical structure, controls for individual differences in acquiescent responding, and provides greater bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power than the original BFI, while still retaining the original measure’s conceptual focus, brevity, and ease of understanding.
Abstract: [Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 113(1) of Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (see record 2017-26058-001).In the article, all citations to McCrae and Costa (2008), except for the instance in which it appears in the first paragraph of the introduction, should instead appear as McCrae and Costa (2010). The complete citation should read as follows: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. The attribution to the BFI-2 items that appears in the Table 6 note should read as follows: BFI-2 items adapted from "Conceptualization, Development, and Initial Validation of the Big Five Inventory-2," by C. J. Soto and O. P. John, 2015, Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality. Copyright 2015 by Oliver P. John and Christopher J. Soto. The complete citation in the References list should appear as follows: Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2015, June). Conceptualization, development, and initial validation of the Big Five Inventory-2. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, St. Louis, MO. Available from http://www.colby.edu/psych/personality-lab/ All versions of this article have been corrected. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Three studies were conducted to develop and validate the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2), a major revision of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Study 1 specified a hierarchical model of personality structure with 15 facet traits nested within the Big Five domains, and developed a preliminary item pool to measure this structure. Study 2 used conceptual and empirical criteria to construct the BFI-2 domain and facet scales from the preliminary item pool. Study 3 used data from 2 validation samples to evaluate the BFI-2's measurement properties and substantive relations with self-reported and peer-reported criteria. The results of these studies indicate that the BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure, and an important advance over the original BFI. Specifically, the BFI-2 introduces a robust hierarchical structure, controls for individual differences in acquiescent responding, and provides greater bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power than the original BFI, while still retaining the original measure's conceptual focus, brevity, and ease of understanding. The BFI-2 therefore offers valuable new opportunities for research examining the structure, assessment, development, and life outcomes of personality traits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

908 citations