Janine-Sophie Giraudet-Le Quintrec

Bio: Janine-Sophie Giraudet-Le Quintrec is an academic researcher from French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Patient education. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 12 publications receiving 370 citations. Previous affiliations of Janine-Sophie Giraudet-Le Quintrec include Paris Descartes University.

Positive effect of patient education for hip surgery: a randomized trial.

Abstract: The current trial compared patient education before total hip arthroplasty with the usual verbal information. A randomized, controlled 24-month prospective single-center study was done. Patients scheduled for a first elective total hip arthroplasty for primary hip osteoarthritis were enrolled. All patients were given the usual information and an information leaflet and completed a self-evaluation questionnaire (Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory). The patients were assigned randomly to two groups: Group 1 attended a collective multidisciplinary information session 2 to 6 weeks before surgery and the control group did not attend. All patients completed another State Anxiety Inventory just before surgery and then 1 and 7 days after surgery. One hundred patients were randomized. Forty-eight attended the collective information session. Patients receiving education were significantly less anxious just before surgery than patients in the control group, in linear regression after adjustment for gender, trait and state anxiety at baseline, depression score, and health assessment questionnaire score. They experienced less pain before surgery and were able to stand sooner. However, the trend toward lower anxiety scores was not statistically significant after surgery. Patient education decreases preoperative anxiety and pain in patients having hip surgery.

Influence of patient education on exercise compliance in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of education on the exercise habits of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after 6 and 12 months. METHODS: We studied 208 outpatients recruited between June 2001 and December 2002. This was a prospective controlled randomized trial. The active group received a multidisciplinary education program, including training in home-based exercises and guidelines for leisure physical activity (PA). The control group received a booklet added to usual medical care. Compliance with home-based exercises was defined as a practice rate >or= 30% of the prescribed training. Compliance with leisure PA was defined as >or= 20% increase in Baecke questionnaire score. Additional assessments involved possible predictors of compliance and changes with regard to the compliance. RESULTS: At 6-month followup, home-based exercise and leisure PA compliance were significantly higher [13.5% vs 1%, respectively (p = 0.001); and 28.2% vs 13.8% (p = 0.02)], but were not at 12 months. Predictors of leisure PA compliance at 6 months included participating in the active group (odds ratio 2.74, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.38) and previous low leisure PA (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.47 to 14.61), with decreased fatigue (FACIT-F mean -2.94 +/- 8.04 vs -0.1 +/- 7.25 for noncompliant subjects; p = 0.04) and improved psychological status (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale mean -1.25 +/- 3.12 vs 0.11 +/- 3.39; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Education of patients with RA may increase compliance especially with leisure PA, particularly when it is poor at baseline, but these effects are limited and short-term.

Effect of a collective educational program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on health and functional status of an 8-week group-education program for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in addition to usual medical care. METHODS: All consecutive inpatients and outpatients with RA (ACR criteria) were asked to participate in this randomized, prospective, controlled trial. The educational intervention consisted of 8 weekly ambulatory sessions, each lasting 6 hours. Followup was undertaken after 1 year. The primary criterion for judging effectiveness was the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score; secondary criteria consisted of coping, medical knowledge, patient global satisfaction, and quality of life scores before the intervention and after 1 year. RESULTS: We asked 1242 inpatients and outpatients to participate in the study: 208 (16.75%) agreed (104 in each group). At baseline, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. After 1 year, no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in change in HAQ score: -0.04 +/- 0.46 (education group) vs -0.06 +/- 0.47 (control group) (p = 0.79). Statistically significant differences were found in 3 domains: patient coping (-1.22 +/- 5.55 vs -0.22 +/- 3.81; p = 0.03), knowledge (3.42 +/- 4.73 vs 0.73 +/- 3.78; p

Place des « proches » dans les programmes d’éducation thérapeutique des patients en rhumatologie : état des lieux et perspectives

Abstract: Resume Les rhumatismes inflammatoires chroniques (RIC) (polyarthrite rhumatoide, spondyloarthrites…) induisent un bouleversement dans la vie du patient et affectent aussi celle de ses « proches ». Les etudes de l’impact de la maladie sur les proches indiquent que la detresse psychologique du proche serait comparable a celle des patients et qu’une attitude negative du proche vis-a-vis du patient pourrait avoir un effet deletere sur l’etat global du patient. Le poids de l’aide « fardeau » fournie par le proche, est important sur le plan objectif et subjectif. Il semble que le plus difficile a vivre pour les proches soit la sensation d’inefficacite devant la souffrance du patient, le caractere imprevisible de la maladie chronique, ses repercussions sur la vie quotidienne, les projets, et parfois l’isolement social qui en resulte. Les donnees concernant l’education therapeutique des proches sont peu nombreuses et ne sont pas convaincantes, en particulier en termes de benefice et de modalites specifiques d’inclusion du proche dans un programme dedie. Les connaissances du proche sur la maladie ne semblent pas influencer l’etat du patient mais la comprehension adequate de ce que vit la personne aidee, par le proche, est source de coping (mise en place de strategies d’ajustement) adapte. La place des proches dans des interventions educatives pour aider le patient merite donc d’etre precisee.

EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)

Abstract: Objectives: To develop evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 16 rheumatologists, one physiatrist, one orthopaedic surgeon, two allied health professionals, and one evidence based medicine expert, representing 15 different European countries. Each participant contributed up to 10 propositions describing key clinical points for management of hand OA. Final recommendations were agreed using a Delphi consensus approach. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, AMED, Cochrane Library, HTA, and NICE reports was used to identify the best available research evidence to support each proposition. Where possible, the effect size and number needed to treat were calculated for efficacy. Relative risk or odds ratio was estimated for safety, and incremental cost effectiveness ratio was used for cost effectiveness. The strength of recommendation was provided according to research evidence, clinical expertise, and perceived patient preference. Results: Eleven key propositions involving 17 treatment modalities were generated through three Delphi rounds. Treatment topics included general considerations (for example, clinical features, risk factors, comorbidities), non-pharmacological (for example, education plus exercise, local heat, and splint), pharmacological (for example, paracetamol, NSAIDs, NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents, COX-2 inhibitors, systemic slow acting disease modifying drugs, intra-articular corticosteroids), and surgery. Of 17 treatment modalities, only six were supported by research evidence (education plus exercise, NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, topical NSAIDs, topical capsaicin, and chondroitin sulphate). Others were supported either by evidence extrapolated from studies of OA affecting other joint sites or by expert opinion. Strength of recommendation varied according to level of evidence, benefits and harms/costs of the treatment, and clinical expertise. Conclusion: Eleven key recommendations for treatment of hand OA were developed using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. The evidence was evaluated and the strength of recommendation was provided.

Preoperative education for hip or knee replacement

Abstract: Background Hip or knee replacement is a major surgical procedure that can be physically and psychologically stressful for patients. It is hypothesised that education before surgery reduces anxiety and enhances clinically important postoperative outcomes. Objectives To determine whether preoperative education in people undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement improves postoperative outcomes with respect to pain, function, health-related quality of life, anxiety, length of hospital stay and the incidence of adverse events (e.g. deep vein thrombosis). Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2013, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2013), EMBASE (1980 to May 2013), CINAHL (1982 to May 2013), PsycINFO (1872 to May 2013) and PEDro to July 2010. We handsearched the Australian Journal of Physiotherapy (1954 to 2009) and reviewed the reference lists of included trials and other relevant reviews. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi-randomised trials of preoperative education (verbal, written or audiovisual) delivered by a health professional within six weeks of surgery to people undergoing hip or knee replacement compared with usual care. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We analysed dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios. We combined continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where possible, we pooled data using a random-effects meta-analysis. Main results We included 18 trials (1463 participants) in the review. Thirteen trials involved people undergoing hip replacement, three involved people undergoing knee replacement and two included both people with hip and knee replacements. Only six trials reported using an adequate method of allocation concealment, and only two trials blinded participants. Few trials reported sufficient data to analyse the major outcomes of the review (pain, function, health-related quality of life, global assessment, postoperative anxiety, total adverse events and re-operation rate). There did not appear to be an effect of time on any outcome, so we chose to include only the latest time point available per outcome in the review. In people undergoing hip replacement, preoperative education may not offer additional benefits over usual care. The mean postoperative anxiety score at six weeks with usual care was 32.16 on a 60-point scale (lower score represents less anxiety) and was 2.28 points lower with preoperative education (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.68 to 1.12; 3 RCTs, 264 participants, low-quality evidence), an absolute risk difference of -4% (95% CI -10% to 2%). The mean pain score up to three months postoperatively with usual care was 3.1 on a 10-point scale (lower score represents less pain) and was 0.34 points lower with preoperative education (95% CI -0.94 to 0.26; 3 RCTs, 227 participants; low-quality evidence), an absolute risk difference of -3% (95% CI -9% to 3%). The mean function score at 3 to 24 months postoperatively with usual care was 18.4 on a 68-point scale (lower score represents better function) and was 4.84 points lower with preoperative education (95% CI -10.23 to 0.66; 4 RCTs, 177 participants; low-quality evidence), an absolute risk difference of -7% (95% CI -15% to 1%). The number of people reporting adverse events, such as infection and deep vein thrombosis, did not differ between groups, but the effect estimates are uncertain due to very low quality evidence (23% (17/75) reported events with usual care versus 18% (14/75) with preoperative education; risk ratio (RR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.19 to 3.21; 2 RCTs, 150 participants). Health-related quality of life, global assessment of treatment success and re-operation rates were not reported. In people undergoing knee replacement, preoperative education may not offer additional benefits over usual care. The mean pain score at 12 months postoperatively with usual care was 80 on a 100-point scale (lower score represents less pain) and was 2 points lower with preoperative education (95% CI -3.45 to 7.45; 1 RCT, 109 participants), an absolute risk difference of -2% (95% CI -4% to 8%). The mean function score at 12 months postoperatively with usual care was 77 on a 100-point scale (lower score represents better function) and was no different with preoperative education (0; 95% CI -5.63 to 5.63; 1 RCT, 109 participants), an absolute risk difference of 0% (95% CI -6% to 6%). The mean health-related quality of life score at 12 months postoperatively with usual care was 41 on a 100-point scale (lower score represents worse quality of life) and was 3 points lower with preoperative education (95% CI -6.38 to 0.38; 1 RCT, 109 participants), an absolute risk difference of -3% (95% CI -6% to 1%). The number of people reporting adverse events, such as infection and deep vein thrombosis, did not differ between groups (18% (11/60) reported events with usual care versus 13% (7/55) with preoperative education; RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.66; 1 RCT, 115 participants), an absolute risk difference of -6% (-19% to 8%). Global assessment of treatment success, postoperative anxiety and re-operation rates were not reported. Authors' conclusions Although preoperative education is embedded in the consent process, we are unsure if it offers benefits over usual care in terms of reducing anxiety, or in surgical outcomes, such as pain, function and adverse events. Preoperative education may represent a useful adjunct, with low risk of undesirable effects, particularly in certain patients, for example people with depression, anxiety or unrealistic expectations, who may respond well to preoperative education that is stratified according to their physical, psychological and social need.

Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center.

Abstract: Improvements in pain management techniques in the last decade have had a major impact on the practice of total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA). Although there are a number of treatment options for postoperative pain, a gold standard has not been established. However, there appears to be a shift towards multimodal approaches using regional anesthesia to minimize narcotic consumption and to avoid narcotic-related side effects. Over the last 10 years, we have used intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), femoral nerve block (FNB), and continuous epidural infusions for 24 and 48 hours with and without FNB. Unfortunately, all of these techniques had shortcomings, not the least of which was suboptimal pain control and unwanted side effects. Our practice has currently evolved to using a multimodal protocol that emphasizes local periarticular injections while minimizing the use of parenteral narcotics. Multimodal protocols after THA and TKA have been a substantial advance; they provide better pain control and patient satisfaction, lower overall narcotic consumption, reduce hospital stay, and improve function while minimizing complications. Although no pain protocol is ideal, it is clear that patients should have optimum pain control after TKA and THA for enhanced satisfaction and function.

EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

Abstract: Objectives The task force aimed to: (1) develop evidence-based recommendations for patient education (PE) for people with inflammatory arthritis, (2) identify the need for further research on PE and (3) determine health professionals’ educational needs in order to provide evidence-based PE. Methods A multidisciplinary task force, representing 10 European countries, formulated a definition for PE and 10 research questions that guided a systematic literature review (SLR). The results from the SLR were discussed and used as a basis for developing the recommendations, a research agenda and an educational agenda. The recommendations were categorised according to level and strength of evidence graded from A (highest) to D (lowest). Task force members rated their agreement with each recommendation from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Results Based on the SLR and expert opinions, eight recommendations were developed, four with strength A evidence. The recommendations addressed when and by whom PE should be offered, modes and methods of delivery, theoretical framework, outcomes and evaluation. A high level of agreement was achieved for all recommendations (mean range 9.4–9.8). The task force proposed a research agenda and an educational agenda. Conclusions The eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for PE for people with inflammatory arthritis are intended to provide a core framework for the delivery of PE and training for health professionals in delivering PE across Europe