scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jay M. Sullivan

Other affiliations: Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Bio: Jay M. Sullivan is an academic researcher from Harvard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Blood pressure & Plasma renin activity. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 28 publications receiving 2397 citations. Previous affiliations of Jay M. Sullivan include Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Paul K. Whelton, Lawrence J. Appel, Jeanne Charleston, Arlene Taylor Dalcin, Craig K. Ewart, Linda P. Fried, Delores Kaidy, Michael J. Klag, Shiriki K. Kumanyika, Lyn Steffen, W. Gordon Walker, Albert Oberman, Karen Counts, Heidi Hataway, James M. Raczynski, Neil Rappaport, Roland Weinsier, Nemat O. Borhani, Edmund Bernauer, Patricia A. Borhani, Carlos de la Cruz, Andrew Ertl, Doug Heustis, Marshall Lee, Wade Lovelace, Ellen O'Connor, Liz Peel, Carolyn Sugars, James O. Taylor, Beth Walker Corkery, Denis A. Evans, Mary Ellen Keough, Martha Clare Morris, Eleanor Pistorino, Frank M. Sacks, Mary Cameron, Sheila Corrigan, Nancy King Wright, William B. Applegate, Amy Brewer, Laretha Goodwin, Stephen T. Miller, Joseph T. Murphy, Judy Randle, Jay M. Sullivan, Norman L. Lasser, David M. Batey, Lee Dolan, Sheila Hamill, Pat Kennedy, Vera I. Lasser, Lewis H. Kuller, Arlene W. Caggiula, N. Carole Milas, Monica E. Yamamoto, Thomas M. Vogt, Merwyn R. Greenlick, Jack F. Hollis, Victor J. Stevens, Jerome D. Cohen, Mildred Mattfeldt-Beman, Connie Brinkmann, Katherine Roth, Lana Shepek, Charles H. Hennekens, Julie E. Buring, Nancy R. Cook, Ellie Danielson, Kim Eberlein, David Gordon, Patricia R. Hebert, Jean MacFadyen, Sherry L. Mayrent, Bernard Rosner, Suzanne Satterfield, Heather Tosteson, Martin Van Denburgh, Jeffrey A. Cutler, Erica Brittain, Marilyn Farrand, Peter G. Kaufmann, Ed Lakatos, Eva Obarzanek, John Belcher, Andrea Dommeyer, Ivan Mills, Peggy Neibling, Margo Woods, B.J. Kremen Goldman, Elaine Blethen 
04 Mar 1992-JAMA
TL;DR: Weight reduction is the most effective of the strategies tested for reducing blood pressure in normotensive persons, and sodium reduction is also effective.
Abstract: Objective. —To test the short-term feasibility and efficacy of seven nonpharmacologic interventions in persons with high normal diastolic blood pressure. Design. —Randomized control multicenter trials. Setting. —Volunteers recruited from the community, treated and followed up at special clinics. Participants. —Of 16821 screenees, 2182 men and women, aged 30 through 54 years, with diastolic blood pressure from 80 through 89 mm Hg were selected. Of these, 50 did not return for follow-up blood pressure measurements. Interventions. —Three life-style change groups (weight reduction, sodium reduction, and stress management) were each compared with unmasked nonintervention controls over 18 months. Four nutritional supplement groups (calcium, magnesium, potassium, and fish oil) were each compared singly, in double-blind fashion, with placebo controls over 6 months. Main Outcome Measures. —Primary: change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to final follow-up, measured by blinded observers. Secondary: changes in systolic blood pressure and intervention compliance measures. Results. —Weight reduction intervention produced weight loss of 3.9 kg (P .05). Conclusions. —Weight reduction is the most effective of the strategies tested for reducing blood pressure in normotensive persons. Sodium reduction is also effective. The long-term effects of weight reduction and sodium reduction, alone and in combination, require further evaluation. (JAMA. 1992;267:1213-1220)

717 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is tentatively concluded that the addition of dipyridamole to a program of anticoagulation reduces the frequency of postoperative arterial emboli originating on prosthetic cardiac valves in patients who can tolerate the drug.
Abstract: Either dipyridamole, a vasodilator known to reduce platelate adhesiveness and aggregation, or a placebo was given in a daily dose of 400 mg as a random, blind trial to 70 patients who had undergone prosthetic cardiac-valve replacement. Patients in both groups were given anticoagulation with warfarin sodium. Of 36 patients in the placebo group followed for 557 months systemic arterial embolism occurred in 17 per cent. Twenty-seven patients in the dipyridamole group followed for 393 months gave no clinical evidence of arterial embolism. Dipyridamole was discontinued shortly after surgery in seven patients, and these were followed for 110 months. In two of them cerebral emboli developed six months after treatment was discontinued. It is tentatively concluded that the addition of dipyridamole to a program of anticoagulation reduces the frequency of postoperative arterial emboli originating on prosthetic cardiac valves in patients who can tolerate the drug.

328 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Ventricular aneurysm was recognized by cineventriculography in twenty-four patients with coronary heart disease and proved most difficult to diagnose clinically and usually depended on ventriculographic for recognition.

295 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Propranolol may offer an approach to the treatment of anginal pain which is refractory to conventional modes of therapy, but clinical nor resting physiologic data seem to be of value in predicting the response of a given patient to the drug.
Abstract: Propranolol may offer an approach to the treatment of anginal pain which is refractory to conventional modes of therapy. Its efficacy may result from (1) lowering both left ventricular mechanical and metabolic requirements, (2) interference with sensory perception of anginal pain, or (3) blockade of adrenergic coronary vasoconstrictor activity which may precipitate angina in some subjects. Neither clinical nor resting physiologic data seem to be of value in predicting the response of a given patient to the drug.

168 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Comparison of several clinical and biochemical variables among the renin study subgroups revealed no differences except that the group with a low level of renin activity excreted a greater amount of sodium, which supports the hypothesis that a low reninActivity level may evolve with time in patients with essential hypertension.
Abstract: Plasma renin activity and aldosterone secretion rates were measured in 100 patients with essential hypertension in response to a low sodium diet and upright posture. Plasma renin activity showed a subnormal response in 22 percent of patients, and a greater than normal response in 4 percent. In contrast to findings in 50 normal subjects, there was a significant positive correlation between the incidence of subnormal renin response and patient age and level of diastolic blood pressure. There was no correlation between renin response and known duration of hypertension. Comparison of several clinical and biochemical variables among the renin study subgroups revealed no differences except that the group with a low level of renin activity excreted a greater amount of sodium. These data support the hypothesis that a low renin activity level may evolve with time in patients with essential hypertension.

148 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (guidelines) with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health.
Abstract: Since 1980, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have translated scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (guidelines) with recommendations to improve cardiovascular health. In 2013, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Advisory

4,604 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2011-Stroke
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of future stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemi-chemic attack, including the control of risk factors, intervention for vascular obstruction, antithrombotic therapy for cardioembolism, and antiplatelet therapy for noncardioembolic stroke.
Abstract: The aim of this updated guideline is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of future stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The guideline is addressed to all clinicians who manage secondary prevention for these patients. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for control of risk factors, intervention for vascular obstruction, antithrombotic therapy for cardioembolism, and antiplatelet therapy for noncardioembolic stroke. Recommendations are also provided for the prevention of recurrent stroke in a variety of specific circumstances, including aortic arch atherosclerosis, arterial dissection, patent foramen ovale, hyperhomocysteinemia, hypercoagulable states, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, sickle cell disease, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and pregnancy. Special sections address use of antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy after an intracranial hemorrhage and implementation of guidelines.

4,545 citations

Journal Article
08 Jan 1994-BMJ
TL;DR: There was no appreciable evidence that either a higher aspirin dose or any other antiplatelet regimen was more effective than medium dose aspirin in preventing vascular events, so in each of the four main high risk categories overall mortality was significantly reduced.
Abstract: Abstract Objective: To determine the effects of “prolonged” antiplatelet therapy (that is, given for one month or more) on “vascular events” (non-fatal myocardial infarctions, non-fatal strokes, or vascular deaths) in various categories of patients. Design: Overviews of 145 randomised trials of “prolonged” antiplatelet therapy versus control and 29 randomised comparisons between such antiplatelet regimens. Setting: Randomised trials that could have been available by March 1990. Subjects: Trials of antiplatelet therapy versus control included about 70 000 “high risk” patients (that is, with some vascular disease or other condition implying an increased risk of occlusive vascular disease) and 30 000 “low risk” subjects from the general population. Direct comparisons of different antiplatelet regimens involved about 10 000 high risk patients. Results: In each of four main high risk categories of patients antiplatelet therapy was definitely protective. The percentages of patients suffering a vascular event among those allocated antiplatelet therapy versus appropriately adjusted control percentages (and mean scheduled treatment durations and net absolute benefits) were: (a) among about 20 000 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 10% antiplatelet therapy v 14% control (one month benefit about 40 vascular events avoided per 1000 patients treated (2P< 0.00001)); (b) among about 20 000 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, 13% antiplatelet therapy v 17% control (two year benefit about 40/1000 (2P<0.00001)); (c) among about 10 000 patients with a past history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 18% antiplatelet therapy v 22% control (three year benefit about 40/1000 (2P<0.00001)); (d) among about 20 000 patients with some other relevant medical history (unstable angina, stable angina, vascular surgery, angioplasty, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, peripheral vascular disease, etc), 9% v 14% in 4000 patients with unstable angina (six month benefit about 50/1000 (2P<0.00001)) and 6% v 8% in 16 000 other high risk patients (one year benefit about 20/1000 (2P<0.00001)). Reductions in vascular events were about one quarter in each of these four main categories and were separately statistically significant in middle age and old age, in men and women, in hypertensive and normotensive patients, and in diabetic and non: diabetic patients. Taking all high risk patients together showed reductions of about one third in non-fatal myocardial infarction, about one third in non-fatal stroke, and about one sixth in vascular death (each 2P<0.00001). There was no evidence that non-vascular deaths were increased, so in each of the four main high risk categories overall mortality was significantly reduced. The most widely tested antiplatelet regimen was “medium dose” (75-325 mg/day) aspirin. Doses throughout this range seemed similarly effective (although in an acute emergency it might be prudent to use an initial dose of 160-325 mg rather than about 75 mg). There was no appreciable evidence that either a higher aspirin dose or any other antiplatelet regimen was more effective than medium dose aspirin in preventing vascular events. The optimal duration of treatment for patients with a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack could not be determined directly because most trials lasted only one, two, or three years (average about two years). Nevertheless, there was significant (2P<0.00001) further benefit between the end of year 1 and the end of year 3, suggesting that longer treatment might well be more effective. Among low risk recipients of “primary prevention” a significant reduction of one third in non: fatal myocardial infarction was, however, accompanied by a non-significant increase in stroke. Furthermore, the absolute reduction in vascular events was much smaller than for high risk patients despite a much longer treatment period (4.4% antiplatelet therapy v 4.8% control; five year benefit only about four per 1000 patients treated) and was not significant (2P=0.09). Conclusions: Among a much wider range of patients at high risk of occlusive vascular disease than is currently treated routinely, some years of antiplatelet therapy - with aspirin 75-325 mg/day or some other antiplatelet regimen (provided there are no contraindications) - offers worthwhile protection against myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Significant benefit is evident not only among patients with unstable angina, suspected acute myocardial infarction, or a past history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack, but also among many other categories of high risk patients (such as those having vascular procedures and those with stable angina or peripheral vascular disease). There is as yet, however, no clear evidence on the balance of risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy in primary prevention among low risk subjects.

3,706 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Frank B. Hu1
TL;DR: The rationale for studying dietary patterns is described, quantitative methods for analysing dietary patterns and their reproducibility and validity are discussed, and the available evidence regarding the relationship between major Dietary patterns and the risk of cardiovascular disease is discussed.
Abstract: Recently, dietary pattern analysis has emerged as an alternative and complementary approach to examining the relationship between diet and the risk of chronic diseases. Instead of looking at individual nutrients or foods, pattern analysis examines the effects of overall diet. Conceptually, dietary patterns represent a broader picture of food and nutrient consumption, and may thus be more predictive of disease risk than individual foods or nutrients. Several studies have suggested that dietary patterns derived from factor or cluster analysis predict disease risk or mortality. In addition, there is growing interest in using dietary quality indices to evaluate whether adherence to a certain dietary pattern (e.g. Mediterranean pattern) or current dietary guidelines lowers the risk of disease. In this review, we describe the rationale for studying dietary patterns, and discuss quantitative methods for analysing dietary patterns and their reproducibility and validity, and the available evidence regarding the relationship between major dietary patterns and the risk of cardiovascular disease.

3,383 citations