scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jeffery S. Isaacson

Bio: Jeffery S. Isaacson is an academic researcher from University of California, San Diego. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neural Inhibition. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 1214 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Oct 2011-Neuron
TL;DR: Current views of how inhibition regulates the function of cortical neurons are discussed, and a number of important open questions are pointed to.

1,429 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Mar 2013-Neuron
TL;DR: Evidence is reviewed for the following hypothesis: that the dual oscillations form a code for representing multiple items in an ordered way, and that this coding scheme coordinates communication between brain regions and is involved in sensory as well as memory processes.

1,200 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work describes a simple and complementary interaction scheme between three large, molecularly distinct interneuron populations in mouse visual cortex: parvalbumin-expressing interneurons strongly inhibit one another but provide little inhibition to other populations, while somatostatin-expresses avoid inhibiting one another yet strongly inhibit all other populations.
Abstract: Cortical inhibitory neurons contact each other to form a network of inhibitory synaptic connections. Our knowledge of the connectivity pattern underlying this inhibitory network is, however, still incomplete. Here we describe a simple and complementary interaction scheme between three large, molecularly distinct interneuron populations in mouse visual cortex: parvalbumin-expressing interneurons strongly inhibit one another but provide little inhibition to other populations. In contrast, somatostatin-expressing interneurons avoid inhibiting one another yet strongly inhibit all other populations. Finally, vasoactive intestinal peptide-expressing interneurons preferentially inhibit somatostatin-expressing interneurons. This scheme occurs in supragranular and infragranular layers, suggesting that inhibitory networks operate similarly at the input and output of the visual cortex. Thus, as the specificity of connections between excitatory neurons forms the basis for the cortical canonical circuit, the scheme described here outlines a standard connectivity pattern among cortical inhibitory neurons.

1,180 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
06 Oct 2013-Nature
TL;DR: A class of interneurons that express vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) mediates disinhibitory control in multiple areas of neocortex and is recruited by reinforcement signals, revealing a specific cell type and microcircuit underlying disinhibited control in cortex and demonstrating that it is activated under specific behavioural conditions.
Abstract: In the mammalian cerebral cortex the diversity of interneuronal subtypes underlies a division of labour subserving distinct modes of inhibitory control. A unique mode of inhibitory control may be provided by inhibitory neurons that specifically suppress the firing of other inhibitory neurons. Such disinhibition could lead to the selective amplification of local processing and serve the important computational functions of gating and gain modulation. Although several interneuron populations are known to target other interneurons to varying degrees, little is known about interneurons specializing in disinhibition and their in vivo function. Here we show that a class of interneurons that express vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) mediates disinhibitory control in multiple areas of neocortex and is recruited by reinforcement signals. By combining optogenetic activation with single-cell recordings, we examined the functional role of VIP interneurons in awake mice, and investigated the underlying circuit mechanisms in vitro in auditory and medial prefrontal cortices. We identified a basic disinhibitory circuit module in which activation of VIP interneurons transiently suppresses primarily somatostatin- and a fraction of parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory interneurons that specialize in the control of the input and output of principal cells, respectively. During the performance of an auditory discrimination task, reinforcement signals (reward and punishment) strongly and uniformly activated VIP neurons in auditory cortex, and in turn VIP recruitment increased the gain of a functional subpopulation of principal neurons. These results reveal a specific cell type and microcircuit underlying disinhibitory control in cortex and demonstrate that it is activated under specific behavioural conditions.

986 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
31 Jul 2014-Nature
TL;DR: The equalization of E/I ratios across pyramidal cells reveals an unexpected degree of order in the spatial distribution of synaptic strengths and indicates that the relationship between the cortex’s two opposing forces is stabilized not only in time but also in space.
Abstract: Different amounts of excitation received by different pyramidal cells of primary visual cortex are matched by proportional amounts of inhibition. The balance between synaptic excitation and inhibition in the mammalian sensory cortex — known as the E/I ratio — is an important influence on both sensory processing and cognitive function. The mechanisms that establish and maintain the E/I ratio are still poorly understood. It is not clear whether each cortical neuron has the ability of individually regulating its own E/I ratio or if the E/I ratio is equalized across the pyramidal cell population. In a study of mouse primary visual cortex, Massimo Scanziani and colleagues show that E/I ratios are remarkably similar across different pyramidal cells despite large variations in the amplitudes of synaptic excitation and inhibition. This is achieved through matched inhibition mediated by parvalbumin-expressing but not by somatostatin-expressing interneurons. The relationship between synaptic excitation and inhibition (E/I ratio), two opposing forces in the mammalian cerebral cortex, affects many cortical functions such as feature selectivity and gain1,2. Individual pyramidal cells show stable E/I ratios in time despite fluctuating cortical activity levels. This is because when excitation increases, inhibition increases proportionally through the increased recruitment of inhibitory neurons, a phenomenon referred to as excitation–inhibition balance3,4,5,6,7,8,9. However, little is known about the distribution of E/I ratios across pyramidal cells. Through their highly divergent axons, inhibitory neurons indiscriminately contact most neighbouring pyramidal cells10,11. Is inhibition homogeneously distributed12 or is it individually matched to the different amounts of excitation received by distinct pyramidal cells? Here we discover that pyramidal cells in layer 2/3 of mouse primary visual cortex each receive inhibition in a similar proportion to their excitation. As a consequence, E/I ratios are equalized across pyramidal cells. This matched inhibition is mediated by parvalbumin-expressing but not somatostatin-expressing inhibitory cells and results from the independent adjustment of synapses originating from individual parvalbumin-expressing cells targeting different pyramidal cells. Furthermore, this match is activity-dependent as it is disrupted by perturbing pyramidal cell activity. Thus, the equalization of E/I ratios across pyramidal cells reveals an unexpected degree of order in the spatial distribution of synaptic strengths and indicates that the relationship between the cortex’s two opposing forces is stabilized not only in time but also in space.

626 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work considers the relationship between visual expectation and related concepts, such as attention and adaptation, and discusses how expectations may influence decision signals at the computational level.
Abstract: Sensory signals are highly structured in both space and time. These structural regularities in visual information allow expectations to form about future stimulation, thereby facilitating decisions about visual features and objects. Here, we discuss how expectation modulates neural signals and behaviour in humans and other primates. We consider how expectations bias visual activity before a stimulus occurs, and how neural signals elicited by expected and unexpected stimuli differ. We discuss how expectations may influence decision signals at the computational level. Finally, we consider the relationship between visual expectation and related concepts, such as attention and adaptation.

616 citations