scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jeffrey L. Myers

Bio: Jeffrey L. Myers is an academic researcher from Mayo Clinic. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 118 publications receiving 22556 citations. Previous affiliations of Jeffrey L. Myers include Albert Einstein College of Medicine & Keimyung University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course.
Abstract: This document is an international evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and is a collaborative effort of the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Association. It represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course. For the diagnosis and treatment sections, pragmatic GRADE evidence-based methodology was applied in a question-based format. For each diagnosis and treatment question, the committee graded the quality of the evidence available (high, moderate, low, or very low), and made a recommendation (yes or no, strong or weak). Recommendations were based on majority vote. It is emphasized that clinicians must spend adequate time with patients to discuss patients' values and preferences and decide on the appropriate course of action.

5,834 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
William D. Travis, Talmadge E. King, Eric D. Bateman, David A. Lynch, Frédrique Capron, Thomas V. Colby, Jean-François Cordier, Roland M. Dubois, Jeffrey R. Galvin, Philippe Grenier, David M. Hansell, Gary W. Hunninghake, Masanori Kitaichi, Nestor L. Müller, Jeffrey L. Myers, Sonoko Nagai, Andrew G. Nicholson, Ganesh Raghu, Benoit Wallaert, Christian Brambilla, Kevin K. Brown, Andrew L. Cherniaev, Ulrich Costabel, David B. Coultas, Gerald S. Davis, Maurits G. Demedts, William W. Douglas, Jim J. Egan, Anders Eklund, Leonarda M. Fabbri, Craig A. Henke, Richard Hubbard, Y. Inoue, Takateru Izumi, H. M. Jansen, Ian Johnston, Dong Soon Kim, Nasreen Khalil, Fiona R. Lake, Giuseppe Lungarella, Joseph P. Lynch, Douglas W. Mapel, Fernando J. Martinez, Richard A. Matthay, Lee S. Newman, Paul W. Noble, Ken Ohta, Dario Olivieri, Luis A. Ortiz, Venerino Poletti, Robert Rodriguez-Roisin, William N. Rom, Jay Hoon Ryu, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva, Raúl H Sansores, Marvin L. Schwarz, Moisés Selman, Cecelia M. Smith, Zhaohui Tong, Zarir F Udwadia, Dominique Valeyre, Athol U. Wells, Robert A. Wise, Antonio Xaubet, Emilio Alvarez Fernandez, Elisabeth Brambilla, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Andrew Cherniaev, Peter Dalquen, Gerhard Dekan, Philip S. Hasleton, James C. Hogg, N. A. Jambhekar, Anna Luise A Katzenstein, Michael Koss, Osamu Matsubara, Klaus Michael Müller, F. B.J.M. Thunnissen, James A. Waldron, Wei Hua Li, Paul J. Friedman, Martin Remy-Jardin, Theresa C. McLoud 
TL;DR: The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Abstract: Executive Summary Objectives Participants Evidence Validation Key Messages Introduction Rationale for a Change in the Approach to Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias Development of a New Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Current Classification of IIP New ATS/ERS Classification Principles Guiding the Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features IPF: Areas of Uncertainty Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features NSIP: Areas of Uncertainty Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features COP: Areas of Uncertainty Acute Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features AIP: Areas of Uncertainty Respiratory Bronchiolitis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features RB-ILD: Areas of Uncertainty Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features DIP: Areas of Uncertainty Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features LIP: Areas of Uncertainty References Appendix

3,591 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The guideline panel provided recommendations related to the diagnosis of IPF, including a conditional recommendation for multidisciplinary discussion and a strong recommendation against measurement of serum biomarkers for the sole purpose of distinguishing IPF from other ILDs.
Abstract: Background: This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, Eur...

2,352 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors updated the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Rensenshine Society/Latin American thoracic Association guideline on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment using systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Abstract: Background: This document updates the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association guideline on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment.Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize all available evidence pertinent to our questions. The evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were formulated, written, and graded exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists.Results: After considering the confidence in effect estimates, the importance of outcomes studied, desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications to health equity, recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions.Conclusion...

1,389 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In women with a high risk of breast cancer on the basis of family history, prophylactic mastectomy can significantly reduce the incidence of Breast cancer.
Abstract: Background Options for women at high risk for breast cancer include surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic mastectomy. The data on the outcomes for surveillance and prophylactic mastectomy are incomplete. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all women with a family history of breast cancer who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy at the Mayo Clinic between 1960 and 1993. The women were divided into two groups — high risk and moderate risk — on the basis of family history. A control study of the sisters of the high-risk probands and the Gail model were used to predict the number of breast cancers expected in these two groups in the absence of prophylactic mastectomy. Results We identified 639 women with a family history of breast cancer who had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: 214 at high risk and 425 at moderate risk. The median length of follow-up was 14 years. The median age at prophylactic mastectomy was 42 years. According to the Gail model, 37.4 breast cancers wer...

1,295 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course.
Abstract: This document is an international evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and is a collaborative effort of the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Latin American Thoracic Association. It represents the current state of knowledge regarding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and contains sections on definition and epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, natural history, staging and prognosis, treatment, and monitoring disease course. For the diagnosis and treatment sections, pragmatic GRADE evidence-based methodology was applied in a question-based format. For each diagnosis and treatment question, the committee graded the quality of the evidence available (high, moderate, low, or very low), and made a recommendation (yes or no, strong or weak). Recommendations were based on majority vote. It is emphasized that clinicians must spend adequate time with patients to discuss patients' values and preferences and decide on the appropriate course of action.

5,834 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
William D. Travis, Talmadge E. King, Eric D. Bateman, David A. Lynch, Frédrique Capron, Thomas V. Colby, Jean-François Cordier, Roland M. Dubois, Jeffrey R. Galvin, Philippe Grenier, David M. Hansell, Gary W. Hunninghake, Masanori Kitaichi, Nestor L. Müller, Jeffrey L. Myers, Sonoko Nagai, Andrew G. Nicholson, Ganesh Raghu, Benoit Wallaert, Christian Brambilla, Kevin K. Brown, Andrew L. Cherniaev, Ulrich Costabel, David B. Coultas, Gerald S. Davis, Maurits G. Demedts, William W. Douglas, Jim J. Egan, Anders Eklund, Leonarda M. Fabbri, Craig A. Henke, Richard Hubbard, Y. Inoue, Takateru Izumi, H. M. Jansen, Ian Johnston, Dong Soon Kim, Nasreen Khalil, Fiona R. Lake, Giuseppe Lungarella, Joseph P. Lynch, Douglas W. Mapel, Fernando J. Martinez, Richard A. Matthay, Lee S. Newman, Paul W. Noble, Ken Ohta, Dario Olivieri, Luis A. Ortiz, Venerino Poletti, Robert Rodriguez-Roisin, William N. Rom, Jay Hoon Ryu, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva, Raúl H Sansores, Marvin L. Schwarz, Moisés Selman, Cecelia M. Smith, Zhaohui Tong, Zarir F Udwadia, Dominique Valeyre, Athol U. Wells, Robert A. Wise, Antonio Xaubet, Emilio Alvarez Fernandez, Elisabeth Brambilla, Vera Luiza Capelozzi, Andrew Cherniaev, Peter Dalquen, Gerhard Dekan, Philip S. Hasleton, James C. Hogg, N. A. Jambhekar, Anna Luise A Katzenstein, Michael Koss, Osamu Matsubara, Klaus Michael Müller, F. B.J.M. Thunnissen, James A. Waldron, Wei Hua Li, Paul J. Friedman, Martin Remy-Jardin, Theresa C. McLoud 
TL;DR: The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Abstract: Executive Summary Objectives Participants Evidence Validation Key Messages Introduction Rationale for a Change in the Approach to Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias Development of a New Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia Current Classification of IIP New ATS/ERS Classification Principles Guiding the Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias The Diagnostic Process Is Dynamic Clinical Evaluation Radiological Evaluation Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy Unclassifiable Interstitial Pneumonia Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Evaluation Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features IPF: Areas of Uncertainty Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features NSIP: Areas of Uncertainty Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features COP: Areas of Uncertainty Acute Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features AIP: Areas of Uncertainty Respiratory Bronchiolitis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features RB-ILD: Areas of Uncertainty Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features DIP: Areas of Uncertainty Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia Clinical Features Radiologic Features Histologic Features LIP: Areas of Uncertainty References Appendix

3,591 citations

01 Jan 1995
TL;DR: Values below this suggest that further studies, such as split func-tion assessment by quantitative lung scintigraphy and exercisetesting, are warranted, and that all elective surgery Prophylaxis against deep venous throm-bosis should be given before most procedures that will require postoperative bed rest or significantly reduce mobility.
Abstract: SUMMARY OF APPROACH The approach to surgery in the patient with COPD is summa-rized below. Surgery Definitely indicated Lung resection. Pulmonary function studies should be performedbefore lung resection. Simple spirometry has the greatest utilityin documenting physiologic operability. FEV, > 2 L in an adultman or > 60% of predicted is acceptable for pneumonectomy.Values below this suggest that further studies, such as split func-tion assessment by quantitative lung scintigraphy and exercisetesting, are warranted.FEV, predicted after lung resection to be less than 40 to 50%of normal for the patient’s sex, age, and height suggests highermorbidity and mortality. An exercise 90, of less than 10 to 15ml/min per kg of body weight is associated with higher mor-bidity and mortality after lung resection.All elective surgery Prophylaxis against deep venous throm-bosis should be given before most procedures that will requirepostoperative bed rest or significantly reduce mobility. Heparinin low doses seems well accepted for most procedures. Externalpneumatic compression of the lower legs can be used when anti-coagulants are contraindicated.

3,498 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Members of the Fleischner Society compiled a glossary of terms for thoracic imaging that replaces previous glossaries published in 1984 and 1996 for Thoracic radiography and computed tomography, respectively.
Abstract: Members of the Fleischner Society compiled a glossary of terms for thoracic imaging that replaces previous glossaries published in 1984 and 1996 for thoracic radiography and computed tomography (CT), respectively. The need to update the previous versions came from the recognition that new words have emerged, others have become obsolete, and the meaning of some terms has changed. Brief descriptions of some diseases are included, and pictorial examples (chest radiographs and CT scans) are provided for the majority of terms.

3,299 citations