scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Jerome S. Bruner published in 1964"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take the view that the development of human intellectual functioning from infancy to such perfection as it may reach is shaped by a series of technological advances in the use of mind.
Abstract: I SHALL take the view in what follows that the development of human intellectual functioning from infancy to such perfection as it may reach is shaped by a series of technological advances in the use of mind. Growth depends upon the mastery of techniques and cannot be understood without reference to such mastery. These techniques are not, in the main, inventions of the individuals who are "growing up"; they are, rather, skills transmitted with varying efficiency and success by the culture—language being a prime example. Cognitive growth, then, is in a major way from the outside in as well as from the inside out. Two matters will concern us. The first has to do with the techniques or technologies that aid growing human beings to represent in a manageable way the recurrent features of the complex environments in which they live. It is fruitful, I think, to distinguish three systems of processing information by which human beings construct models of their world: through action, through imagery, and through language. A second concern is with integration, the means whereby acts are organized into higher-order ensembles, making possible the use of larger and larger units of information for the solution of particular problems. Let me first elucidate these two theoretical matters, and then turn to an examination of the research upon which they are based, much of it from the Center for Cognitive Studies at Harvard.

1,034 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
24 Apr 1964-Science
TL;DR: Pictures of common objects, coming slowly into focus, were viewed by adult observers and recognition was delayed when subjects first viewed the pictures out of focus.
Abstract: Pictures of common objects, coming slowly into focus, were viewed by adult observers. Recognition was delayed when subjects first viewed the pictures out of focus. The greater or more prolonged the initial blur, the slower the eventual recognition. Interference may be accounted for partly by the difficulty of rejecting incorrect hypotheses based on substandard cues.

233 citations


Journal ArticleDOI

60 citations