scispace - formally typeset
J

Jia Deng

Researcher at Princeton University

Publications -  158
Citations -  110718

Jia Deng is an academic researcher from Princeton University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Object detection. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 148 publications receiving 73461 citations. Previous affiliations of Jia Deng include University of Michigan & Carnegie Mellon University.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article

LifeQA: A Real-life Dataset for Video Question Answering

TL;DR: The challenging but realistic aspects of LifeQA are analyzed, and several state-of-the-art video question answering models are applied to provide benchmarks for future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pd58-12 surgeon technical skill assessment using computer vision-based analysis

TL;DR: A computer vision based method to assess the technical skill level of surgeons by analyzing the movement of robotic instruments in robotic surgical videos that leverages the power of crowd workers on the internet to obtain high quality data in a scalable and cost-efficient way.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

IFOR: Iterative Flow Minimization for Robotic Object Rearrangement

TL;DR: This work proposes IFOR, Iterative Flow Minimization for Robotic Object Rearrangement, an end-to-end method for the challenging problem of object rearrangement for unknown objects given an RGBD image of the original and final scenes and shows that this method applies to cluttered scenes, and in the real world, while training only on synthetic data.
Posted Content

SpatialSense: An Adversarially Crowdsourced Benchmark for Spatial Relation Recognition

TL;DR: SpatialSense is a dataset specializing in spatial relation recognition which captures a broad spectrum of such challenges, allowing for proper benchmarking of computer vision techniques, and provides a path forward to advancing the spatial reasoning capabilities ofComputer vision systems.
Posted Content

To Learn or Not to Learn: Analyzing the Role of Learning for Navigation in Virtual Environments.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare learning-based methods and classical methods for navigation in virtual environments and demonstrate that learned agents have inferior collision avoidance and memory management, but are superior in handling ambiguity and noise.