scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jiaping Qiu

Bio: Jiaping Qiu is an academic researcher from McMaster University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Loan & Corporate governance. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 66 publications receiving 5265 citations. Previous affiliations of Jiaping Qiu include Wilfrid Laurier University & University of Toronto.


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: This article study the effect of financial restatement on bank loan contracting and find that loans initiated after restatements have significantly higher spreads, shorter maturities, higher likelihood of being secured, and more covenant restrictions.
Abstract: This paper is the first to study the effect of financial restatement on bank loan contracting. Compared with loans initiated before restatement, loans initiated after restatement have significantly higher spreads, shorter maturities, higher likelihood of being secured, and more covenant restrictions. The increase in loan spread is significantly larger for fraudulent restating firms than other restating firms. We also find that after restatement, the number of lenders per loan declines and firms pay higher upfront and annual fees. These results are consistent with the view that banks use tighter loan contract terms to overcome risk and information problems arising from financial restatements.

710 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article study the effect of financial restatement on bank loan contracting and find that loans initiated after restatements have significantly higher spreads, shorter maturities, higher likelihood of being secured, and more covenant restrictions.

705 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a two-period investment model is used to show that the cash holdings of financially constrained firms are sensitive to cash flow volatility because financial constraints create an intertemporal trade-off between current and future investments.

687 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined the impact of financial leverage on the firms' investment decisions using information on Canadian publicly traded companies and found that leverage is negatively related to investment and that this negative effect is significantly stronger for firms with low growth opportunities than those with high growth opportunities.

552 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The authors decompose the variation in executive compensation and find that time invariant firm and especially manager fixed effects explain a majority of the variation of executive pay and that in many settings, it is important to include fixed effects to mitigate potential omitted variable bias.
Abstract: We study the role of firm- and manager-specific heterogeneities in executive compensation We decompose the variation in executive compensation and find that time invariant firm and especially manager fixed effects explain a majority of the variation in executive pay We then show that in many settings, it is important to include fixed effects to mitigate potential omitted variable bias Furthermore, we find that compensation fixed effects are significantly correlated with management styles (ie, manager fixed effects in corporate policies) Finally, the method used in the paper has a number of potential applications in financial economics

447 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper pointed out that the "quality" of earnings is a function of the firm's fundamental performance and suggested that the contribution of a firms fundamental performance to its earnings quality is suggested as one area for future work.
Abstract: Researchers have used various measures as indications of "earnings quality" including persistence, accruals, smoothness, timeliness, loss avoidance, investor responsiveness, and external indicators such as restatements and SEC enforcement releases. For each measure, we discuss causes of variation in the measure as well as consequences. We reach no single conclusion on what earnings quality is because "quality" is contingent on the decision context. We also point out that the "quality" of earnings is a function of the firm's fundamental performance. The contribution of a firm's fundamental performance to its earnings quality is suggested as one area for future work.

2,633 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors point out that the quality of earnings is a function of the firm's fundamental performance and suggest that the contribution of a firms fundamental performance to its earnings quality is suggested as one area for future work.

2,140 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The average cash-to-assets ratio for U.S. industrial firms more than doubled from 1980 to 2006 as mentioned in this paper, and the average firm can pay back all of its debt obligations with its cash holdings; in other words, the average firms has no leverage if leverage is measured as net debt.
Abstract: The average cash-to-assets ratio for U.S. industrial firms more than doubles from 1980 to 2006. A measure of the economic importance of this increase in cash holdings is that at the end of the sample period, the average firm can pay back all of its debt obligations with its cash holdings; in other words, the average firm has no leverage if leverage is measured as net debt. This change in cash ratios and net debt is the result of a secular trend rather than the outcome of the recent buildup in cash holdings of some large firms, and it is much more pronounced for firms that do not pay dividends and for firms in industries whose cash flows became riskier. The average cash ratio increases over the sample period because firms change: their cash flows become riskier, they hold fewer inventories and accounts receivable, and they are increasingly RD in contrast, in our empirical tests, agency considerations are not successful in explaining the increase.

2,016 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The Arrow-Pratt theory of risk aversion was shown to be isomorphic to the theory of optimal choice under risk in this paper, making possible the application of a large body of knowledge about risk aversion to precautionary saving.
Abstract: The theory of precautionary saving is shown in this paper to be isomorphic to the Arrow-Pratt theory of risk aversion, making possible the application of a large body of knowledge about risk aversion to precautionary saving, and more generally, to the theory of optimal choice under risk In particular, a measure of the strength of precautionary saving motive analogous to the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion is used to establish a number of new propositions about precautionary saving, and to give a new interpretation of the Oreze-Modigliani substitution effect

1,944 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors investigated how the cash holdings of U.S. firms have evolved since 1980 and whether this evolution can be explained by changes in known determinants of cash holdings and found no consistent evidence that agency conflicts contribute to the increase.
Abstract: The average cash-to-assets ratio for U.S. industrial firms more than doubles from 1980 to 2006. A measure of the economic importance of this increase is that at the end of the sample period, the average firm can retire all debt obligations with its cash holdings. Cash ratios increase because firms’ cash flows become riskier. In addition, firms change: They hold fewer inventories and receivables and are increasingly R&D intensive. While the precautionary motive for cash holdings plays an important role in explaining the increase in cash ratios, we find no consistent evidence that agency conflicts contribute to the increase. CONSIDERABLE MEDIA ATTENTION has been devoted to the increase in cash holdings of U.S. firms. For instance, a recent article in The Wall Street Journal states that “The piles of cash and stockpile of repurchased shares at [big U.S. companies] have hit record levels.” 1 In this paper, we investigate how the cash holdings of U.S. firms have evolved since 1980 and whether this evolution can be explained by changes in known determinants of cash holdings. We document a secular increase in the cash holdings of the typical firm from 1980 to 2006. In a regression of the average cash-to-assets ratio on a constant and time, time has a significantly positive coefficient, implying that the average cash-to-assets ratio (the cash ratio) has increased by 0.46% per year. Another way to see this evolution is that the average cash ratio more than doubles over our sample period, from 10.5% in 1980 to 23.2% in 2006. Everything else equal, following Jensen (1986), we would expect firms with agency problems to accumulate cash if they do not have good investment opportunities and their management does not want to return cash to shareholders. In the absence of agency problems, improvements in information and financial

1,829 citations